Skip to main content

Security report for kryptobetrugshilfe.de

Kryptobetrugshilfe · Finance · Germany

Medium risk. 6 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 2 other checks.

Security score

50/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Kryptobetrugshilfe.de is a specialized German-language website offering expert assistance to victims of cryptocurrency fraud. The business provides forensic blockchain tracing, legal advisory, and support services to help recover lost funds and navigate the complexities of crypto crime. The site targets individuals and companies affected by crypto scams, emphasizing cooperation with law enforcement and legal professionals. Technically, the website is built on WordPress with modern plugins like Gravity Forms and Yoast SEO, delivering a responsive and content-rich user experience. Security posture is good with HTTPS and secure form handling, though some improvements in security headers and privacy compliance are recommended. Overall, the site presents a trustworthy and professional front for a niche service provider in the crypto fraud prevention sector.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
28/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

6 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  3. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching kryptobetrugshilfe.de

This scan found 27 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
62
Security headers
45
Email security
85
DNS health
60
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
28
Average
50

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention kryptobetrugshilfe.de, from OffSeq Breach.

No leaked records found

Breach holds no records for kryptobetrugshilfe.de right now. New leaks arrive continuously, so monitoring on Breach alerts you if that changes.

Monitor on Breach (opens in a new tab)

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company positions itself as a niche service provider in the finance sector, focusing on crypto crime victims in Germany and neighboring countries. Its competitive advantage lies in combining blockchain forensic expertise with legal support, offering tailored crypto tracing reports and legal representation. The business model revolves around service fees for tracing, legal advice, and incident management. The website content and references indicate a small but specialized operation founded recently in 2023. Partnerships with crypto tracing platforms enhance service capabilities. The target customers are crypto investors, victims of scams, and companies requiring compliance checks. Growth potential is linked to increasing crypto adoption and fraud prevalence.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a mature security posture with enforced HTTPS and secure form submissions via Gravity Forms. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were detected in the HTML content. However, the absence of security headers like Content-Security-Policy and lack of a published security policy or incident response contact reduce the overall security maturity. There is no evidence of vulnerability disclosure mechanisms or security.txt files. The site should enhance transparency and readiness by publishing security policies and incident response contacts. GDPR compliance is partially met with a privacy policy but lacks cookie consent mechanisms. Overall, the security posture is good but can be improved to meet higher compliance standards.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-XSS-Protection.
  2. Add a cookie consent banner/mechanism to comply fully with GDPR cookie regulations.
  3. Publish a clear security policy and incident response contact information on the website.
  4. Consider establishing a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file to encourage responsible reporting.
  5. Provide direct company contact information such as official emails and phone numbers to improve trust and accessibility.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Kryptobetrugshilfe
Description
Schnelle Hilfe bei Krypto-Betrug durch ein Team aus Blockchain-Forensikern, Ermittlern und Anwälten in Kooperation. Unterstützung bei der Rückverfolgung von Krypto-Betrug, Crypto-Tracing, und rechtlicher Beratung.
Key services
Crypto-Tracing Reports, Rechtsberatung bei Kryptobetrug, Strafanzeigen-Erstattung, Crypto Risk Assessment, Passwort-Wiederherstellung für Krypto-Konten
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, Gravity Forms, jQuery, Yoast SEO, Swiper Slider, LazySizes
Frameworks
Gravity Forms
Platforms
WordPress
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
80/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Use of secure form submission via Gravity Forms

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
good
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website provides specialized services for victims of cryptocurrency fraud.
  2. Content is comprehensive, well-structured, and includes multimedia educational materials.
  3. No direct company contact emails or phone numbers publicly listed; contact is via form.
  4. No cookie consent mechanism detected despite GDPR relevance.
  5. No explicit security policy or incident response contacts published.
  6. Uses modern web technologies and SEO best practices.
  7. No signs of malicious or suspicious content.
  8. Strong focus on legal and forensic assistance in crypto crime.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a WordPress CMS platform using modern and widely supported plugins such as Gravity Forms for form handling and Yoast SEO for search engine optimization. The tech stack includes jQuery and Swiper for interactive elements and lazy loading for images to optimize performance. Hosting is provided by netservpro, indicated by the nameservers. The site is mobile optimized with responsive design and good navigation clarity. Performance is moderate with room for improvement in accessibility features. SEO is well implemented with meta tags, Open Graph, and JSON-LD structured data. No critical technical debt or outdated libraries were detected, indicating a well-maintained infrastructure.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with kryptobetrugshilfe.de. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review kryptobetrugshilfe.de.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.