Skip to main content

Security report for krpolenc.cz

KOENING Shopping, s.r.o. · Retail · Czech Republic

Medium risk. 6 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 2 other checks.

Security score

59/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Královo Pole is a medium-sized retail shopping center located in Brno, Czech Republic, operated by KOENING Shopping, s.r.o. The website provides comprehensive information about the center's shops, restaurants, parking facilities, events, and services. It targets general shoppers and local residents, positioning itself as a regional retail hub with a focus on customer convenience and modern amenities such as electromobility charging stations. Technically, the website employs modern JavaScript libraries, Google Analytics, and cookie consent management, reflecting a moderate to good level of digital maturity. The site is mobile-optimized and offers a good user experience with clear navigation and professional design. Security-wise, the site enforces HTTPS and uses cookie consent mechanisms but lacks explicit security headers and public security policies. The absence of WHOIS data reduces domain trustworthiness, though the website content and business presence appear legitimate. Overall, the site is safe, professional, and compliant with GDPR requirements, but could improve transparency and security posture.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
40/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

6 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      Third-party services without privacy policy

      Detected services: Google Analytics, Facebook

      What to do: Document all third-party data sharing in your privacy policy

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  3. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching krpolenc.cz

This scan found 19 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
62
Security headers
70
Email security
85
DNS health
75
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
40
Average
59

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The business operates in the retail and hospitality sectors, managing a shopping center with nearly 100 stores and multiple dining options. Its business model revolves around leasing commercial space and providing services to tenants and customers. The company maintains a portfolio of related shopping centers across the Czech Republic, indicating a strong regional presence and partnership ecosystem. The website supports marketing efforts through events and promotions and leverages social media channels for customer engagement. The lack of direct contact information on the site may limit immediate customer support but aligns with a centralized contact approach. The company appears stable with a consistent brand and professional online presence.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a basic to moderate security posture with HTTPS enforced and cookie consent implemented, supporting GDPR compliance. However, it lacks visible security headers such as Content Security Policy or HSTS, and there is no public security policy or incident response information. No vulnerability disclosures or security.txt files are present, which limits transparency for security researchers. The absence of WHOIS data is a concern for domain legitimacy and trust. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were detected in the HTML content. Overall, the security posture is adequate for a retail website but could be enhanced with additional headers, policies, and incident response details.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and configure security headers including Content Security Policy, HSTS, and X-Frame-Options to enhance protection against common web attacks.
  2. Publish a clear security policy and incident response contact information to improve transparency and readiness.
  3. Regularly audit and update third-party scripts and libraries to mitigate potential vulnerabilities.
  4. Enhance accessibility features to improve compliance and user experience for all visitors.
  5. Consider publishing WHOIS data or ensuring domain registration information is accessible to improve trust and legitimacy.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
KOENING Shopping, s.r.o.
Description
Královo Pole is a shopping center offering 97 shops, 13 restaurants and cafes, and 872 parking spaces. It supports electromobility with 8 fast charging stations in its garages. The site provides information about stores, events, services, and contact details.
Key services
Retail stores, Restaurants and cafes, Parking facilities, Gift cards, Events and promotions
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
JavaScript, CSS, HTML5, Google Tag Manager, Google Analytics, Flickity slider, Cookies Giant consent management
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent management implemented
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Ad networks
Google Ads
Tracking pixels
Facebook Pixel
Marketing tools
Cookies Giant
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is a professional shopping center site with rich content and clear navigation.
  2. No WHOIS data available, which is unusual and reduces domain trust score.
  3. Cookie consent and privacy policies are implemented and GDPR compliant.
  4. No direct contact emails or phone numbers found in the HTML content.
  5. Social media presence on Facebook and Instagram is active.
  6. No security policy or incident response information publicly available.
  7. No vulnerability disclosure or security.txt found.
  8. Website uses modern tracking and marketing tools with consent management.
  9. No adult or questionable content detected; site is safe for general audiences.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a modern front-end stack with JavaScript, CSS, and HTML5, incorporating libraries such as Flickity for sliders and Google Tag Manager for analytics and marketing. Cookie consent is managed via Cookies Giant, indicating attention to privacy compliance. The site is mobile-optimized and loads with moderate performance. No CMS or hosting provider information is explicitly detected. The site structure is clear with semantic HTML and meta tags supporting SEO. Technical debt appears low, but opportunities exist to improve security headers and accessibility compliance. The absence of WHOIS data is a technical anomaly that should be addressed to ensure domain legitimacy.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with krpolenc.cz. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review krpolenc.cz.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.