Skip to main content

Security report for kroll.com

Kroll · Finance · N/a

Low risk. 2 critical or high findings in SSL/TLS.

Security score

80/100

Risk levelLow

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Kroll is a leading independent provider of financial and risk advisory solutions, offering services such as financial advisory, risk management, cyber risk, and compliance consulting. The company targets corporate clients, financial institutions, and legal professionals, positioning itself as a trusted advisor in complex financial and risk environments. The website reflects a mature enterprise with a professional digital presence, leveraging modern web technologies including React and Next.js, and integrating advanced consent management and analytics tools. Security posture is strong with HTTPS enforcement and security headers, though explicit security policies and incident response details are not publicly disclosed. WHOIS data is not publicly available, which slightly impacts transparency but does not detract from the overall legitimacy given the professional branding and content. Strategic recommendations include publishing detailed security and incident response policies and improving WHOIS transparency to enhance trust.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
88/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

2 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1
    • High

      Weak SSL Key Length

      SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

      What to do: Use at least 2048-bit RSA or 256-bit ECC key

      • CWE-326
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • Mozilla TLS: Mozilla Server Side TLS 6.0 intermediate: rsa_key_size 2048

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching kroll.com

This scan found 16 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
57
Security headers
85
Email security
65
DNS health
85
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
88
Average
80

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Kroll operates in the finance sector with a business model centered on professional advisory services. Its market position as a leading independent firm is supported by comprehensive service offerings and a strong brand presence. The company leverages digital marketing and analytics tools to engage its target audience effectively. The absence of WHOIS data transparency is a notable gap but may be due to registry policies. The company maintains active social media channels and uses structured data to improve search visibility. No direct partnerships or subsidiaries were identified from the website content.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a solid security posture with HTTPS, multiple security headers, and consent-based cookie management. No exposed sensitive information or vulnerable libraries were detected. However, the lack of a published security policy or incident response plan reduces transparency and preparedness perception. There is no evidence of a vulnerability disclosure program or security.txt file. Overall, the security maturity is good but could be enhanced by publishing more explicit security governance information.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a detailed security policy and incident response plan on the website to improve transparency and trust.
  2. Implement and publicize a vulnerability disclosure program or security.txt file to encourage responsible reporting.
  3. Improve WHOIS data transparency or provide justification for privacy protection to enhance legitimacy perception.
  4. Regularly audit and update third-party scripts and tracking tools to minimize privacy risks.
  5. Enhance contact information with physical addresses and DPO contact details to comply with GDPR and build trust.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Kroll
Description
As the leading independent provider of financial and risk advisory solutions, Kroll leverages unique insights, data and technology to help clients stay ahead of complex demands.
Key services
Financial advisory, Risk advisory, Cyber risk management, Compliance risk management
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
React, Next.js, Google Tag Manager, OneTrust Consent Management, Adobe Typekit Fonts, Oracle Eloqua
Frameworks
Next.js
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Consent management for cookies
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Use of security headers

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics (via GTM), Oracle Eloqua
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Oracle Eloqua
Marketing tools
Oracle Eloqua, OneTrust
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is professionally designed with comprehensive content about financial and risk advisory services.
  2. Strong privacy and cookie policy presence with consent management.
  3. No signs of adult or questionable content.
  4. WHOIS data is missing or restricted, which is a concern for transparency.
  5. Use of modern web technologies and tracking tools with consent.
  6. No visible security vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data.
  7. No explicit security policy or incident response information published.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a modern technology stack based on React and Next.js, ensuring good performance and mobile responsiveness. Integration with Google Tag Manager, Oracle Eloqua, and OneTrust indicates a mature approach to analytics and privacy compliance. The site uses Adobe Typekit for fonts and loads resources efficiently. No common CMS was detected, suggesting a custom or proprietary solution. Performance is moderate with good SEO and accessibility features. Hosting provider details are not explicitly available. The technical implementation supports a professional and scalable digital presence.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with kroll.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review kroll.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.