Skip to main content

Security report for krizovnickapomoc.cz

Křižovnický domácí hospic · Healthcare · Czech Republic

Partial score · DNS & email only

54/100

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Křižovnický domácí hospic sv. Anežky České is a Czech non-profit organization providing home hospice and palliative care services. The website presents a professional and consistent brand image, targeting patients and families in need of end-of-life care. The organization is relatively new, founded in 2021, and maintains partnerships with several healthcare and social service entities. Technically, the site is built on WordPress with common plugins and libraries, including Contact Form 7 and Google reCAPTCHA for spam protection. While HTTPS is properly configured, the site lacks explicit privacy and cookie policies, which are important for GDPR compliance. Security headers are not visibly implemented, representing an area for improvement. Overall, the site is trustworthy and functional but could enhance privacy compliance and security posture.

Scanned

3 of 7 checks could not complete. The site may be unreachable or blocking automated scans, so the results below cover only what could be checked. Try a rescan later.

NIS2 and GDPR posture

NIS2 outside view
Not assessed
GDPR outside view
Not assessed

Both readouts depend on the site's pages, which could not be loaded in this scan.

Priority findings

3 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • Critical

      No email authentication configured

      Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

      What to do: Implement SPF, DKIM, and DMARC immediately

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

  3. Network security

    Services reachable from the internet are the first thing attackers probe. Anything open that does not need to be should be closed.

    • High

      High-Risk Service Exposed: FTP

      Port 21 (FTP) is publicly accessible - FTP - Often unencrypted file transfer

      What to do: Consider restricting access to FTP or implementing strong authentication

      • NIS2 21(2)(e)
      • IR 2024/2690 6.7.2(f): Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690, Annex point 6.7.2(f): Network security
      • NIST CM-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 CM-7: Least Functionality
      • NIST SC-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 SC-7: Boundary Protection

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching krizovnickapomoc.cz

This scan found 15 issues across 4 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
62
Email security
60
DNS health
75
Network security
20
Average
54

Not counted

  • Security headers: did not complete in this scan.
  • GDPR outside view: did not complete in this scan.
  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The hospice operates in the healthcare and non-profit sectors, focusing on providing compassionate end-of-life care at home. Its business model relies on donations, partnerships, and community support, as evidenced by the donation widget and partner logos. The target audience includes patients with terminal illnesses, their families, and healthcare professionals. The organization has established a network of partners, enhancing its service delivery and credibility. The website content is relevant and professionally presented, supporting the organization's mission and outreach efforts.

Security posture

The website enforces HTTPS and integrates Google reCAPTCHA v3 on its contact form, which helps mitigate spam and automated abuse. However, the absence of security headers such as Content Security Policy (CSP), X-Frame-Options, and HSTS reduces the overall security posture. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the HTML content. The lack of a published security policy or incident response contact limits transparency in security management. Enhancing these areas would improve resilience against common web threats and demonstrate a stronger security culture.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive privacy and cookie policies to ensure GDPR compliance.
  2. Add security headers (CSP, HSTS, X-Frame-Options) to improve web security.
  3. Publish a security policy and incident response contact information.
  4. Regularly update WordPress core and plugins to mitigate vulnerabilities.
  5. Consider integrating analytics with privacy-respecting configurations to monitor site usage.

Contact details published on the site

Legal name
Křižovnický domácí hospic
Registration number
08432040
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Křižovnický domácí hospic
Description
Křižovnický domácí hospic sv. Anežky České provides home hospice and palliative care services, social counseling, and medical equipment rental. It aims to support patients with terminal illnesses and their families, offering care at home and related services.
Key services
Home hospice care, Palliative ambulance services, Social counseling, Medical equipment rental
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, jQuery, Contact Form 7, Google reCAPTCHA, Mesmerize theme and companion plugin, Owl Carousel
Frameworks
WordPress
Platforms
Web
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
80/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Google reCAPTCHA v3 integrated on contact form
  • Contact form uses validation and spam protection

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Marketing tools
GTranslate
Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is a professionally designed hospice care service site.
  2. Content is in Czech language with some English language switcher available.
  3. No explicit privacy or cookie policies found, which is a compliance gap.
  4. Contact form uses Google reCAPTCHA v3 for spam protection.
  5. Donation widget integrated from darujme.cz, a Czech donation platform.
  6. Multiple partner and supporter logos displayed, indicating community trust.
  7. No visible security headers detected in HTML content.
  8. No analytics scripts like Google Analytics detected.
  9. No advertising or tracking pixels detected beyond translation and captcha scripts.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a modern WordPress CMS with a custom child theme based on the Mesmerize theme. It employs jQuery and Owl Carousel for UI components and integrates Google Fonts for typography. The site loads asynchronously linked CSS and JavaScript resources, improving performance. Mobile optimization is good, with responsive design and accessible navigation. However, SEO optimization is basic, with limited meta tags and no structured data like JSON-LD detected. The hosting provider is likely WEDOS, consistent with the registrar information. Overall, the technical infrastructure is solid but could benefit from enhanced SEO and security configurations.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with krizovnickapomoc.cz. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review krizovnickapomoc.cz.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.