Skip to main content

Security report for krimelte.com

Wolf Group · Energy · N/a

Medium risk. 5 critical or high findings in Security headers, SSL/TLS and 1 other check.

Security score

58/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Wolf Group is a manufacturer specializing in construction chemistry products such as PU foams, sealants, adhesives, and coatings targeted at professional construction markets. The company presents itself as a global player with a focus on energy-saving solutions. The website is built on WordPress with modern SEO practices and integrates multiple Google services for analytics and marketing. The technical infrastructure is solid with HTTPS and cookie consent mechanisms in place, though some security headers are missing. The absence of explicit privacy policies, terms of service, and contact information reduces transparency and compliance posture. The WHOIS data is notably missing or inaccessible, raising concerns about domain legitimacy despite the professional website presence. Overall, the site is functional and well-designed but requires improvements in compliance documentation and domain registration transparency.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
88/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

5 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

  3. Network security

    Services reachable from the internet are the first thing attackers probe. Anything open that does not need to be should be closed.

    • High

      High-Risk Service Exposed: FTP

      Port 21 (FTP) is publicly accessible - FTP - Often unencrypted file transfer

      What to do: Consider restricting access to FTP or implementing strong authentication

      • NIS2 21(2)(e)
      • IR 2024/2690 6.7.2(f): Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690, Annex point 6.7.2(f): Network security
      • NIST CM-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 CM-7: Least Functionality
      • NIST SC-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 SC-7: Boundary Protection

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching krimelte.com

This scan found 24 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
15
Email security
75
DNS health
75
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
88
Average
58

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Wolf Group operates in the energy and construction sectors, manufacturing chemical products for professional use. Their business model centers on product manufacturing and distribution with a global reach. The website targets construction professionals and contractors, emphasizing energy-saving products. The company appears medium-sized with a founding date around 2020. The lack of visible contact details and corporate registration information limits business credibility. The use of Google marketing and analytics tools indicates a focus on digital marketing and customer engagement. No partnerships or subsidiaries were identified from the website content.

Security posture

The website enforces HTTPS and uses Google reCAPTCHA to protect forms, indicating a baseline security posture. Cookie consent is implemented with granular user controls, supporting GDPR compliance. However, the absence of key security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options weakens defense against common web attacks. No security policy or incident response contacts are published, limiting transparency and readiness. The missing WHOIS data is a significant red flag for domain legitimacy and trust. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the analyzed content. Overall, the security posture is moderate but could be enhanced with better headers, policies, and transparency.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a comprehensive privacy policy and terms of service accessible from the website footer.
  2. Add explicit security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Content-Type-Options, and X-Frame-Options.
  3. Provide clear contact information including company emails and phone numbers for general and security inquiries.
  4. Implement and publish a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file to encourage responsible reporting.
  5. Verify and update domain WHOIS registration to ensure transparency and trustworthiness.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Wolf Group
Description
Wolf Group is a manufacturer of construction chemistry products and solutions, offering PU foams, sealants, adhesives, coatings and more for professional construction.
Key services
PU foams, Sealants, Adhesives, Coatings
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, Yoast SEO plugin, jQuery, Cookiebot, Google Tag Manager, Google reCAPTCHA, YouTube embedded player
Platforms
Web
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Use of Google reCAPTCHA
  • Cookie consent banner with granular controls

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics
Tracking level
extensive
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Ad networks
Google
Tracking pixels
Google reCAPTCHA
Marketing tools
Cookiebot
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is accessible with full content and no blocking detected.
  2. Professional design with good SEO and mobile optimization.
  3. Cookie consent mechanism is implemented with detailed cookie categories.
  4. No explicit privacy policy or terms of service found in the provided content.
  5. No contact emails or phone numbers explicitly found in the HTML content.
  6. WHOIS data is missing or domain is unregistered, which is suspicious.
  7. Use of multiple Google services for analytics and marketing.
  8. No security.txt or vulnerability disclosure information found.
  9. No explicit security or incident response contact information found.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses WordPress CMS with Yoast SEO plugin, jQuery, Cookiebot for cookie consent, Google Tag Manager, and Google reCAPTCHA. Embedded YouTube videos are present. The site is mobile optimized and uses modern font loading techniques. Performance is moderate with minified CSS and asynchronous script loading. Accessibility is basic but could be improved. SEO is good with proper meta tags, Open Graph, and JSON-LD structured data. Hosting provider details are not evident from the content. No major technical debt or deprecated libraries were detected.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with krimelte.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review krimelte.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.