Kreuzer International is a German-based company specializing in hotel furniture and equipment, including energy-saving minibars and design safes, serving hotels across Europe. The company has an established market presence since 2001, positioning itself as a reliable supplier in the hospitality sector. The website reflects a professional and consistent brand image with a focus on B2B customers in the hotel industry. Technically, the site uses modern web technologies such as Bootstrap and JavaScript, with a custom or unknown CMS. The site is mobile-optimized and provides a good user experience with clear navigation and search functionality. Security-wise, the website enforces HTTPS with good SSL configuration and employs Cookiebot for GDPR-compliant cookie consent management. Minor security improvements are recommended, such as enabling DNSSEC and publishing a security.txt file. Overall, the site demonstrates a solid security posture and privacy compliance, though explicit contact information and terms of service are not readily found on the homepage. Strategic recommendations include enhancing security headers, improving transparency with a security policy, and adding clear contact channels for incident response.
Scanned ·
NIS2 and GDPR posture
GDPR outside view
83/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7
NIS2 Art. 21(2)
a(a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
b(b) Incident handling: One indicator
c(c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
d(d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
e(e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
f(f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
g(g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
h(h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
i(i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
j(j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside
Partly checked
One indicator
Not visible from outside
This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.
GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.
Priority findings
2 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.
Security headers
Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.
High
Missing Content-Security-Policy header
Controls resources the browser is allowed to load
What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application
This scan found 16 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.
Daily monitoring
Recommended
€25per month
TLS certificates and expiry
DNS records
SPF, DKIM and DMARC
Security headers
GDPR and NIS2 posture
Exposed services
Third-party trackers
Security score drift
Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.
Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.
Results by check
Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.
How this score is calculated
The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.
Counted in this score
SSL/TLS
75
Security headers
50
Email security
87
DNS health
80
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
83
Average
79
Not counted
NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.
Findings that cap the score at 49
Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.
The certificate is not trusted by browsers
The website is not served over HTTPS
A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
The page loads a script from a compromised source
The domain registration has expired
SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain
Partial scans
When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.
Risk levels
Critical0–25
High26–49
Medium50–75
Low76–100
Breach exposure
Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.
Dark web exposure
Add-on
Leaked records that mention kreuzer-gmbh.com, from OffSeq Breach.
No leaked records found
Breach holds no records for kreuzer-gmbh.com right now. New leaks arrive continuously, so monitoring on Breach alerts you if that changes.
Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.
Business context
Business profile
The company operates in the hospitality sector, targeting hotels and related businesses in Europe. Its business model is B2B, focusing on supplying premium hotel equipment and furniture. The domain age and consistent WHOIS data support the legitimacy and maturity of the business. The website content and structure indicate a medium-sized enterprise with a stable market position. The absence of social media links and limited contact information suggests a focus on direct business relationships rather than broad consumer engagement. The partnership ecosystem is not explicitly detailed, and no subsidiary or parent company information is found. The company leverages trusted third-party services like Cookiebot and Google Analytics for compliance and marketing purposes.
Security posture
The website demonstrates a good security maturity level with HTTPS enforced and multiple security headers present. The use of CSRF tokens and clientTransferProhibited domain status further enhance security. However, the lack of DNSSEC and absence of a published security.txt file indicate areas for improvement. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were detected in the provided content. Cookie consent management is robust, aligning with GDPR requirements. Incident response readiness cannot be fully assessed due to missing explicit contact channels. Overall, the security culture appears adequate but could benefit from enhanced transparency and formalized policies.
Recommendations
Enable DNSSEC on the domain to improve DNS security and prevent spoofing.
Publish a security.txt file to facilitate vulnerability disclosure and incident reporting.
Implement a comprehensive Content-Security-Policy header to mitigate XSS and related attacks.
Add explicit contact information for security incidents, such as security@ or abuse@ email addresses.
Provide a publicly accessible security policy page detailing security practices and compliance.
The website uses a modern tech stack including HTML5, CSS3, JavaScript, and Bootstrap framework. The search functionality is powered by Sprig components, indicating some level of dynamic content rendering. Cookiebot is integrated for cookie consent management, ensuring GDPR compliance. The site is hosted with InterNetX GmbH, a reputable registrar and hosting provider. Performance is moderate with good mobile optimization and basic accessibility features. SEO is supported by proper meta tags and Open Graph data. No major technical debt or outdated libraries were detected, but the CMS is not clearly identified, suggesting a custom or less common platform. Opportunities exist to enhance security headers and implement DNSSEC for improved resilience.
Standards and sources
Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.
Reviews of this site
Share your experience with kreuzer-gmbh.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.
Community rating
No published reviews yet. Be the first to review kreuzer-gmbh.com.