Skip to main content

Security report for kreative.com

KREATIVE · Media · N/a

Partial score · DNS & email only

50/100

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

KREATIVE is a small creative branding agency focused on defining, strategizing, designing, and developing the identity of future iconic brands. The website presents a professional and consistent branding message targeting businesses seeking creative agency services. The technical infrastructure is basic, running on an Apache server with PHP implied, using jQuery and Google Analytics for tracking. However, the website lacks HTTPS, DNS records, and advanced security configurations, which impacts its security posture negatively. The cookie consent mechanism is implemented, but no contact information or security policies are provided on the homepage. Overall, the site is accessible and functional but requires significant improvements in security and technical setup to enhance trust and compliance.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

Checks completed
5of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

1 finding rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • Critical

      No HTTPS Encryption

      Website does not use HTTPS encryption, making all data transmission vulnerable to interception

      What to do: Implement SSL/TLS certificate and redirect all HTTP traffic to HTTPS

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching kreative.com

This scan found 4 issues across 4 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
0
Email security
50
DNS health
50
Network security
100
Average
50

Not counted

  • Security headers: did not complete in this scan.
  • GDPR outside view: did not complete in this scan.
  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company positions itself as a creative agency in the media sector, targeting businesses aiming to build iconic brands. The business model revolves around providing branding strategy, design, and identity development services. The website content is relevant and professionally presented, but lacks detailed business contact information and certifications. The use of Google Analytics indicates a moderate level of digital marketing maturity. The absence of DNS records and SSL certificate may hinder customer trust and accessibility. No partnerships or subsidiaries are identified from the domain or content.

Security posture

The website currently operates without HTTPS, exposing users to potential interception risks. Security headers such as X-Frame-Options are set, but critical security features like HSTS, DNSSEC, and certificate transparency are missing. No vulnerability disclosure or incident response policies are found, indicating low security maturity. The session management uses cookies but lacks secure flags. The absence of DNS records is a significant operational and security concern. Overall, the security posture is weak and requires urgent remediation to protect user data and improve trust.

Recommendations

  1. Obtain and deploy a valid SSL/TLS certificate to enable HTTPS across the site.
  2. Configure DNS records properly including A, MX, NS, and TXT to ensure domain resolution and email functionality.
  3. Implement HSTS with includeSubDomains and preload to enforce secure connections.
  4. Add DNSSEC and CAA records to enhance DNS security and prevent certificate mis-issuance.
  5. Introduce a security.txt file and vulnerability disclosure policy to improve transparency and incident handling.
  6. Publish contact information including security incident contacts and data protection officer details if applicable.
  7. Review and enhance cookie security flags and session management practices.
Technical notes

Notes

The website runs on an Apache 2.4.41 server on Ubuntu, with PHP sessions indicated by cookies. The front-end uses jQuery and Google Analytics for tracking. The site lacks a CMS or modern frameworks. Performance metrics are missing, but the page size and resource count are zero, indicating incomplete or minimal performance data. The site is mobile responsive at a basic level and includes SEO meta tags and Open Graph data. However, the absence of DNS records and HTTPS severely limits technical robustness and security. The site would benefit from modernization including HTTPS, DNS configuration, and performance optimization.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with kreative.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review kreative.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.