Skip to main content

Security report for krastasportacentrs.lv

Krasta Sporta Centrs · Hospitality · Latvia

High risk. 10 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Email security and 3 other checks.

Security score

44/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Krasta Sporta Centrs is a multifunctional sports complex based in Riga, Latvia, specializing in tennis courts, gym facilities, running tracks, and sauna services. The website presents a well-structured overview of their offerings, targeting sports enthusiasts and families in the local market. The business operates primarily as a sports facility rental and training service provider with a local market focus. Technically, the website uses a variety of JavaScript libraries and Google Maps API to enhance user experience, built on the DIRcms platform. However, the site lacks visible security headers and a confirmed SSL certificate, which are critical for secure user interactions. Privacy compliance is minimal, with no dedicated privacy policy page but a cookie consent banner present. Overall, the site is functional and informative but requires improvements in security and privacy transparency to enhance trust and compliance.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
10/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

10 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

  2. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • Critical

      No email authentication configured

      Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

      What to do: Implement SPF, DKIM, and DMARC immediately

  3. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching krastasportacentrs.lv

This scan found 26 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
62
Security headers
35
Email security
60
DNS health
75
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
10
Average
44

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company positions itself as a local sports and fitness center with a focus on tennis and related activities. Their competitive advantage lies in offering a comprehensive sports complex with indoor and outdoor courts, gym facilities, and wellness amenities like saunas. The business model revolves around facility rental and coaching services, targeting both beginners and advanced players. The presence of a Facebook page indicates some level of social engagement. The website content quality and navigation are good, supporting user engagement. However, the lack of detailed business registration or certification information limits deeper business credibility insights.

Security posture

The website currently exhibits a low security posture due to the absence of visible HTTPS confirmation, missing security headers, and lack of published security or incident response policies. No vulnerability disclosures or security.txt files were found, indicating limited transparency in security practices. The cookie consent mechanism is present but could be enhanced for GDPR compliance. No forms were detected, reducing immediate risk from input vulnerabilities, but the overall security hygiene requires significant improvement to protect user data and build trust.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and enforce HTTPS with a valid SSL certificate to secure all communications.
  2. Publish a comprehensive privacy policy detailing data collection, usage, and user rights to improve GDPR compliance.
  3. Add essential security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to mitigate common web attacks.
  4. Develop and publish an incident response policy and contact channels for security issues to enhance transparency and readiness.
  5. Regularly audit and update third-party libraries and scripts to avoid vulnerabilities and improve performance.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Krasta Sporta Centrs
Description
Krasta Sporta Centrs is a multifunctional sports complex located in Riga, Latvia, offering tennis courts, a gym, running tracks, saunas, and training zones. The complex includes 4 indoor tennis courts with hard Plexicushion Prestige surface, 2 outdoor courts, 4 beach tennis/volleyball courts, a gym, 80m running tracks, warm-up zones, table tennis, spacious changing rooms including a separate children's changing room, and 2 saunas (regular and Turkish). They provide qualified trainers for beginners and children as well as for improving skills for intermediate and advanced players.
Key services
tennis court rental, gym access, training and coaching, sauna services, running tracks, group training zones
Content quality
good
Branding
moderate

Technology

Stack
jQuery, bxSlider, Owl Carousel, Fancybox, PhotoSwipe, Superfish, Semantic UI, WOW.js, Google Maps API
Frameworks
Semantic UI
Performance
moderate
Mobile
basic
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
40/100

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with rich content about a sports center in Riga, Latvia.
  2. No WHOIS data available due to query limit error.
  3. No privacy policy page found, but cookie consent banner is present.
  4. Contact information is clearly provided including phone, email, and physical address.
  5. No security headers detected in provided data; SSL status unknown.
  6. Uses multiple JavaScript libraries and Google Maps API for enhanced UX.
  7. No forms detected in the HTML content provided.
  8. Social media presence limited to Facebook link.
  9. No evidence of security or incident response policies on site.
  10. No vulnerability disclosure or security.txt found.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a mix of popular JavaScript libraries including jQuery, bxSlider, Owl Carousel, Fancybox, PhotoSwipe, Superfish, Semantic UI, and WOW.js, indicating a moderately modern tech stack focused on UI/UX enhancements. The CMS is DIRcms, a Latvian CMS platform. Google Maps API integration is used for location display. Performance is moderate with room for optimization, especially for mobile responsiveness and accessibility. SEO is basic with meta tags present but no advanced structured data or Open Graph tags detected. No forms or complex backend interactions were found in the HTML content, reducing attack surface but also limiting interactive functionality.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with krastasportacentrs.lv. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review krastasportacentrs.lv.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.