Skip to main content

Security report for kraken.tech

Kraken · Energy · N/a

Low risk. 3 critical or high findings in Security headers and SSL/TLS.

Security score

77/100

Risk levelLow

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Kraken.tech is a B2B SaaS company providing an advanced AI-powered operating system tailored for utilities, including energy, water, and telecommunications sectors. The platform focuses on enhancing customer experience, asset optimization, and field management. The website reflects a professional and modern digital presence, leveraging Next.js and various analytics and marketing tools. Security posture is solid with HTTPS and domain transfer protections, though improvements in security headers and explicit policies are recommended. Privacy compliance is partially addressed with cookie consent but lacks visible privacy and terms pages. Overall, Kraken.tech presents as a credible and established player in the utility software market with room for enhanced transparency and security documentation.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
83/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

3 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching kraken.tech

This scan found 19 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
30
Email security
98
DNS health
80
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
83
Average
77

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention kraken.tech, from OffSeq Breach.

No leaked records found

Breach holds no records for kraken.tech right now. New leaks arrive continuously, so monitoring on Breach alerts you if that changes.

Monitor on Breach (opens in a new tab)

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Kraken operates within the energy and utilities sector, targeting distribution and retail utilities as well as water and telco providers. Its business model centers on delivering software solutions that enable operational efficiencies and customer management improvements. The company is part of the Octopus Energy Group, which strengthens its market position. The website's content and structure indicate a focus on enterprise clients seeking AI-driven utility management solutions. The absence of direct contact details suggests a lead-generation approach via demo requests. The use of privacy protection in WHOIS is typical for tech firms, balancing transparency with privacy.

Security posture

The website employs HTTPS and has domain transfer protections, indicating a baseline security posture. However, the absence of security headers such as CSP, HSTS, and X-Frame-Options reduces defense-in-depth. No incident response or vulnerability disclosure information is publicly available, which could hinder security transparency. Cookie consent is implemented, supporting GDPR compliance, but privacy and terms policies are not found, representing compliance gaps. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the content. Overall, the security maturity is moderate with recommendations to enhance headers and publish security policies.

Recommendations

  1. Enable DNSSEC to improve domain security and prevent DNS spoofing.
  2. Publish comprehensive privacy policy and terms of service pages to enhance compliance and user trust.
  3. Implement and publish a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file to facilitate responsible reporting.
  4. Add standard security headers (CSP, HSTS, X-Frame-Options) to strengthen web security posture.
  5. Provide clear contact information including security incident contacts to improve incident response readiness.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Kraken
Description
Kraken is the advanced operating system for utilities delivering exceptional customer experiences, advanced asset optimization and streamlined field management services. It supports energy, water, and telco utilities.
Key services
Customer Management for residential and commercial & industrial customers, Distributed Energy Resource Optimization, Field Operations, Asset Optimization, Generation Flexibility
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
React (Next.js), Chromatophore fonts, Hotjar, Google Tag Manager, Cookiebot, LinkedIn Insight Tag, Factors.ai
Frameworks
Next.js
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled
  • Domain status clientTransferProhibited

Analytics and tracking

Services
Hotjar, Google Analytics (via GTM), LinkedIn Insight
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Hotjar, LinkedIn Insight
Marketing tools
Cookiebot, Factors.ai
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is a professional B2B SaaS platform for utility management.
  2. No explicit privacy or terms of service pages found in provided content.
  3. Cookie consent mechanism is implemented via Cookiebot.
  4. No direct contact emails or phone numbers found in HTML content.
  5. Use of modern web technologies and analytics tools.
  6. No security.txt or vulnerability disclosure policy found.
  7. WHOIS data shows privacy protection but domain age and registrar are consistent with legitimate business.
  8. No WAF or blocking detected; content fully accessible.
  9. No adult or questionable content detected.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a modern React/Next.js framework, hosted likely on AWS infrastructure. It uses multiple third-party analytics and marketing tools including Hotjar, Google Tag Manager, LinkedIn Insight, and Cookiebot for consent management. The site is mobile optimized and SEO friendly with proper meta tags and Open Graph data. Performance is moderate, with deferred loading of scripts and optimized fonts. No CMS detected, indicating a custom-built solution. Technical risks include lack of DNSSEC and missing security headers, which should be addressed to reduce attack surface.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with kraken.tech. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review kraken.tech.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.