Skip to main content

Security report for koszalin360.pl

PERSKIMEDIA Szymon Perski · Media · Poland

Medium risk. 10 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Email security and 2 other checks.

Security score

56/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Koszalin360.pl is a regional interactive multimedia portal focused on providing spherical tours, 360° videos, and multimedia content showcasing the beautiful areas of the Pomorze Zachodnie region in Poland. The website is operated by PERSKIMEDIA Szymon Perski, a small media company established in 2016. The business targets a general audience interested in immersive regional content and tourism-related multimedia experiences. The site uses a technology stack centered around HTML5, JavaScript, jQuery, and WebGL to deliver interactive content, although some libraries are outdated. From a technical perspective, the website demonstrates basic mobile optimization and accessibility features but lacks advanced SEO and performance optimizations. The absence of modern security headers and DNSSEC indicates room for improvement in security hardening. No forms or data collection mechanisms are present, reducing exposure to input-based vulnerabilities but also limiting user engagement and contact opportunities. Security posture is moderate with no visible critical vulnerabilities, but the lack of privacy and cookie policies, security headers, and contact information for incident response reduces compliance and trustworthiness. The WHOIS data aligns well with the website content, showing consistent registration details and domain age appropriate for the business history. Overall, the site is functional for its purpose but would benefit from enhanced security practices, privacy compliance, and richer business contact information to improve trust and user confidence.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
10/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

10 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

  2. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • Critical

      No email authentication configured

      Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

      What to do: Implement SPF, DKIM, and DMARC immediately

  3. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching koszalin360.pl

This scan found 25 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
75
Security headers
15
Email security
60
DNS health
75
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
10
Average
56

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company operates as a small media entity specializing in regional multimedia content for the Pomorze Zachodnie area in Poland. Its business model revolves around providing immersive 360° tours and videos, likely monetized through regional partnerships or tourism promotion. The market position is niche and regional, with limited scale and no evident partnerships or subsidiaries. The lack of contact details and social media presence suggests a low digital marketing footprint. Growth potential exists through enhanced digital engagement and expanded service offerings. The company appears self-managed without parent or subsidiary relationships.

Security posture

The website exhibits a basic security posture with no advanced protections such as DNSSEC or security headers. The absence of privacy and cookie policies indicates non-compliance with GDPR and related regulations. No incident response or vulnerability disclosure information is provided, limiting transparency and readiness. The use of older JavaScript libraries could pose potential security risks if not updated. No forms reduce attack surface but also limit user interaction. Overall, the security maturity is low to moderate, with significant room for improvement in compliance and technical safeguards.

Recommendations

  1. Enable DNSSEC on the domain to improve DNS security.
  2. Implement standard security headers including Content Security Policy (CSP), HSTS, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options.
  3. Add clear privacy and cookie policies to comply with GDPR and enhance user trust.
  4. Provide visible contact information including emails and phone numbers for business and security incident reporting.
  5. Update JavaScript libraries to current versions to mitigate known vulnerabilities.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
PERSKIMEDIA Szymon Perski
Description
Koszalin360.pl jest częścią PomorzeZachodnie360.pl, interaktywnego portalu łączącego wycieczki sferyczne, filmy 360° i zjawiskowe multimedia z najpiękniejszych zakątków regionu.
Key services
spherical tours, 360° videos, multimedia presentations
Content quality
basic
Branding
moderate

Technology

Stack
HTML5, JavaScript, jQuery 2.1.1, jQuery UI 1.11.1, KolorTools, Panotour Pro V2.5.14, WebGL
Performance
moderate
Mobile
basic
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
40/100
Good practices seen
  • Use of HTTPS assumed but not confirmed from data
  • No visible forms or inputs to secure

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
basic
User experience
basic
Content relevance
basic
Navigation
basic
Professionalism
basic
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. No privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found on the site
  2. No contact emails, phone numbers, or physical addresses found in the HTML content
  3. Website uses older versions of jQuery and jQuery UI libraries
  4. No social media links or external business contact points detected
  5. Site content is minimal and focused on interactive 360° multimedia tours
  6. No forms or data collection mechanisms present
  7. No security headers or advanced security configurations detected
  8. No analytics or tracking scripts detected
  9. No advertising or marketing tools detected
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a legacy technology stack with jQuery 2.1.1 and jQuery UI 1.11.1, which are outdated and may have security vulnerabilities. The site relies on Panotour Pro for 360° content delivery and WebGL for rendering. No CMS or hosting provider information is evident. Performance is moderate with basic mobile optimization and accessibility. SEO is basic with meta tags present but no structured data or advanced SEO techniques. No analytics or tracking scripts are detected, indicating minimal user data collection. The site lacks modern security headers and DNSSEC, which are recommended for improved security posture.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with koszalin360.pl. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review koszalin360.pl.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.