Skip to main content

Security report for kopos.pl

KOPOS Elektro PL Sp. z o.o. · Energy · Poland

Medium risk. 7 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 3 other checks.

Security score

58/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

KOPOS Elektro PL Sp. z o.o. is the Polish representative of the Czech manufacturer KOPOS KOLÍN a.s., specializing in electrical installation materials made from plastics and metal. The company offers a broad product range exceeding 5000 items, meeting international quality standards, and operates as one of 10 subsidiaries across Europe, Asia, and Central America. The website reflects a mature business with a strong market presence and a focus on B2B customers in the energy and manufacturing sectors. Technically, the website is built on Drupal 7 with a modern set of JavaScript libraries and tracking tools such as Google Tag Manager and Facebook Pixel. It is mobile-optimized and provides a good user experience with clear navigation and multilingual support. Security posture is solid with HTTPS enforced and cookie consent mechanisms in place, though some security headers and explicit incident response contacts are missing. The absence of WHOIS registration data is a notable anomaly that slightly reduces trustworthiness, but the comprehensive business information, certifications, and multi-domain presence support the legitimacy of the company. Overall, the website is professional, secure, and compliant with GDPR requirements. Strategic recommendations include enhancing security headers, publishing a formal security policy, and providing incident response contact details to improve transparency and trust.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
40/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

7 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      Third-party services without privacy policy

      Detected services: Google Analytics, Facebook, LinkedIn, YouTube, Cloudflare

      What to do: Document all third-party data sharing in your privacy policy

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  3. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • High

      No DMARC record found

      DMARC provides email authentication and reporting

      What to do: Add DMARC record: "v=DMARC1; p=none; rua=mailto:dmarc@yourdomain.com"

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching kopos.pl

This scan found 18 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
62
Security headers
60
Email security
80
DNS health
85
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
40
Average
58

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

KOPOS Elektro PL operates in the energy and manufacturing sectors, focusing on electrical installation products. The company benefits from a long history (99 years) and a network of subsidiaries, positioning it as a significant player in its market. Its business model revolves around manufacturing and distributing high-quality electrical components to B2B clients. Revenue streams likely include product sales and support services. The company maintains a strong partnership ecosystem with multiple country-specific domains and active social media channels, indicating a well-established market presence and growth orientation.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a mature security posture with HTTPS enforced and cookie consent mechanisms aligned with GDPR. However, the lack of security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and absence of explicit incident response or vulnerability disclosure information indicate areas for improvement. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected. The use of third-party tracking pixels is transparent and consent-based. Overall, the security maturity is good but could be enhanced with additional policies and technical controls.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Content-Type-Options, and X-Frame-Options.
  2. Publish a clear security policy and vulnerability disclosure page to improve transparency and user trust.
  3. Add explicit incident response contact information such as security@ or abuse@ email addresses.
  4. Regularly review and update third-party libraries to mitigate potential vulnerabilities.
  5. Enhance accessibility features to improve compliance and user experience for all visitors.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
Kopos Elektro PL Sp. z o. o.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
KOPOS Elektro PL Sp. z o.o.
Description
Asortyment ponad 5000 rodzajów wyrobów spełnia parametry światowe dotyczące jakości zgodnie ze standardami międzynarodowymi. Kopos Elektro Pl jest jedną z 10 spółek zależnych w Europie, Azji i Ameryce Środkowej zabezpieczających sprzedaż wyrobów na rynkach światowych.
Key services
Manufacture of electrical installation boxes, Manufacture of cable trays and supports, Distribution and sales support in Europe, Asia, and Central America
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Drupal 7, jQuery 2.2, Font Awesome 4.4.0, Google Tag Manager, Facebook Pixel, Colorbox, jStorage
Frameworks
Drupal CMS
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Consent management for cookies
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics (via Google Tag Manager)
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Facebook Pixel
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with rich content and multiple language support.
  2. Uses Drupal 7 CMS with several JavaScript libraries and tracking tools.
  3. Has clear contact information including phone, email, and physical address.
  4. Cookie consent mechanism is implemented and GDPR privacy policy is present.
  5. No explicit security policy or incident response contacts found.
  6. WHOIS data is missing, which is unusual and warrants further investigation.
  7. Social media presence on Facebook, Instagram, LinkedIn, and YouTube.
  8. Content is business-focused and safe for general audiences.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses Drupal 7 CMS with jQuery 2.2 and Font Awesome 4.4.0, indicating a somewhat dated but stable technology stack. Performance is moderate with good mobile optimization and SEO practices. The site integrates Google Tag Manager and Facebook Pixel for analytics and marketing. There is room for modernization, especially upgrading Drupal to a newer version and improving accessibility. The technical infrastructure supports the business needs effectively but should be reviewed for long-term sustainability and security.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with kopos.pl. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review kopos.pl.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.