Skip to main content

Security report for kolektorwater.com

Kolektor · Energy · Slovenia

High risk. 8 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

48/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Kolektor is a medium-sized Slovenian company specializing in water technologies, providing comprehensive engineering solutions for water preparation, purification, telemetry, and system optimization. The company is part of the larger Kolektor Group and collaborates with several subsidiaries and partners to deliver advanced water management solutions. The website reflects a professional and consistent brand image targeting B2B clients such as municipalities, industrial water users, and technology partners. Technically, the website employs modern JavaScript libraries, Google Tag Manager, and reCAPTCHA for security and analytics, hosted on a CMS platform with good mobile optimization and SEO practices. Security posture is solid with HTTPS and spam protection, though it lacks some advanced security headers and explicit security policies. The absence of WHOIS data is a notable anomaly, slightly reducing trust but not detracting significantly from the overall legitimacy. Privacy and cookie policies are present and GDPR compliant, with clear consent mechanisms. Overall, the website is well-designed, user-friendly, and trustworthy for its intended audience.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
35/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

8 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching kolektorwater.com

This scan found 19 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
85
Security headers
15
Email security
50
DNS health
85
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
35
Average
48

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Kolektor holds a strong market position in the energy and water technology sectors, leveraging 30 years of experience and partnerships with global leaders. Its business model focuses on B2B engineering services and technological solutions for water supply and management systems. The company targets municipalities, industrial clients, and technology integrators, offering services from technological engineering to telemetry and equipment supply. The partnership ecosystem includes subsidiaries and related companies within the Kolektor Group, enhancing its service breadth. Growth indicators include active project showcases and a robust online presence. The company maintains a professional digital footprint with consistent branding and social media engagement, supporting its market credibility and customer outreach.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a moderate to strong security posture with enforced HTTPS, use of Google reCAPTCHA on forms to prevent spam, and a cookie consent mechanism aligned with GDPR requirements. However, it lacks several recommended HTTP security headers such as Content Security Policy (CSP), HTTP Strict Transport Security (HSTS), and X-Frame-Options, which could enhance protection against common web attacks. No explicit security policy or incident response contact information is published, which is a gap in transparency and readiness. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the content. The absence of a security.txt or vulnerability disclosure page limits the ability for external security researchers to report issues responsibly. Overall, the security posture is adequate but could be improved with additional controls and transparency.

Recommendations

  1. Implement HTTP security headers including CSP, HSTS, and X-Frame-Options to strengthen web security.
  2. Publish a clear security policy and provide incident response contact information to improve transparency and readiness.
  3. Create and maintain a vulnerability disclosure or security.txt page to facilitate responsible reporting of security issues.
  4. Enhance accessibility features to improve compliance and user experience for all users.
  5. Regularly audit third-party scripts and dependencies to mitigate risks from vulnerable libraries.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
Kolektor d.d.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Kolektor
Description
Kolektor provides comprehensive technological systems for water preparation and purification, advanced solutions for monitoring and optimizing water supply systems, focusing on efficiency, reliability, and cost optimization.
Key services
Technological engineering, Telemetry systems, Technological equipment, Water preparation and purification, Water loss detection and optimization
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
JavaScript, Google Tag Manager, Google reCAPTCHA, FontAwesome, jQuery
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
80/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Google reCAPTCHA on forms
  • Cookie consent mechanism

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics via Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with rich content and navigation.
  2. No WAF or security blocking detected.
  3. WHOIS data is missing or unavailable, which is unusual.
  4. Website uses HTTPS with good SSL configuration.
  5. Cookie consent and privacy policies are present and compliant.
  6. No direct company emails or phone numbers found in the HTML content.
  7. Social media presence is active on Facebook, LinkedIn, Instagram, and YouTube.
  8. Multiple partner and subsidiary domains linked.
  9. Forms use Google reCAPTCHA for spam protection.
  10. No explicit security.txt or vulnerability disclosure found.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a modern JavaScript stack with integration of Google Tag Manager and reCAPTCHA for analytics and security. It uses a CMS platform (Creatim) and includes responsive design elements for mobile optimization. Performance is moderate with no major issues detected, though some improvements could be made in accessibility and advanced SEO features. The site structure is clear with well-organized navigation and rich content. Technical debt appears low, but the absence of advanced security headers and explicit security policies indicates areas for modernization. Hosting provider details are not explicitly identified. Overall, the technical infrastructure supports the business needs effectively but has room for security and accessibility enhancements.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with kolektorwater.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review kolektorwater.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.