Skip to main content

Security report for kofola.cz

Kofola ČeskoSlovensko a.s. · Retail · Czech Republic

Medium risk. 5 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

70/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Kofola ČeskoSlovensko a.s. is a well-established beverage manufacturer and retailer operating primarily in the Czech Republic and Slovakia. The company focuses on producing beverages with a strong emphasis on quality, tradition, and innovation, targeting a broad consumer base interested in healthy and enjoyable drinks. Their market position is solid with a recognizable brand and active engagement through multiple social media platforms. Technically, the website employs modern web technologies including jQuery, Google Analytics, and Facebook Pixel, and implements cookie consent mechanisms to comply with privacy regulations. The site is mobile-optimized and provides a good user experience with clear navigation and relevant content. Security-wise, the site uses HTTPS and includes CSRF tokens, but lacks some advanced security headers and explicit security or incident response policies. The absence of WHOIS data reduces trust slightly, but the presence of official contact information and social media links supports legitimacy. Overall, the website is professional and trustworthy with room for improvement in transparency and security documentation.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
85/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

5 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  3. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak SSL Key Length

      SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

      What to do: Use at least 2048-bit RSA or 256-bit ECC key

      • CWE-326
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • Mozilla TLS: Mozilla Server Side TLS 6.0 intermediate: rsa_key_size 2048

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching kofola.cz

This scan found 21 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
65
Security headers
15
Email security
75
DNS health
80
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
85
Average
70

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Kofola operates in the beverage manufacturing and retail sector, with a focus on soft drinks and possibly alcoholic beverages. Their business model centers on product manufacturing, brand marketing, and customer engagement. The company targets general consumers in Czech and Slovak markets, leveraging a strong brand identity and social media presence. The website indicates a large company size with formal registration details and VAT number. The company maintains investor relations through a dedicated subdomain, indicating corporate maturity. The use of multiple advertising and analytics platforms suggests a data-driven marketing approach. The lack of visible privacy and security policies may be an area for strategic improvement to enhance customer trust and regulatory compliance.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a moderate to good security posture with HTTPS enforced and CSRF protection implemented. Cookie consent is actively managed, indicating awareness of privacy compliance. However, the absence of key security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and others is a gap that could expose the site to certain web-based attacks. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the content. The lack of published security policies or incident response contacts limits transparency and preparedness perception. Overall, the security posture is adequate for a commercial website but could be strengthened by adopting additional best practices and publishing relevant security documentation.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and publish a comprehensive privacy policy and terms of service pages to improve transparency and compliance.
  2. Add security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-XSS-Protection to enhance protection against common web attacks.
  3. Publish a security policy and incident response contact information to demonstrate preparedness and build trust.
  4. Regularly audit third-party scripts and tracking technologies to minimize security risks and privacy concerns.
  5. Verify and update WHOIS domain registration information to improve domain legitimacy and trustworthiness.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
Kofola ČeskoSlovensko a.s.
VAT number
CZ24261980
Registration number
24261980
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Kofola ČeskoSlovensko a.s.
Description
Kofola produces beverages with a focus on quality and passion, emphasizing love, healthy living, and innovation. They operate in the Czech and Slovak markets with a strong brand presence.
Key services
Production of beverages, Brand marketing, Customer engagement
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
jQuery, Google Analytics, Facebook Pixel, Cookie-Script
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
80/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • CSRF token present in meta tags
  • Cookie consent mechanism implemented

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, StatCounter
Tracking level
extensive
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Ad networks
Google DoubleClick
Tracking pixels
Facebook Pixel
Marketing tools
Cookie-Script
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with rich content in Czech language.
  2. Strong brand presence with multiple social media channels.
  3. Cookie consent and privacy mechanisms implemented.
  4. WHOIS data unavailable, possibly due to privacy protection or domain registration issues.
  5. No explicit security policy or incident response information found.
  6. No privacy policy or terms of service pages clearly identified.
  7. Website uses multiple third-party analytics and advertising services.
  8. Contact information is clearly presented in footer with company details.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a combination of jQuery and various JavaScript libraries for UI and analytics integration. Google Analytics and Facebook Pixel are used for user behavior tracking and marketing. Cookie-Script manages cookie consent and compliance. The site is responsive and optimized for mobile devices, with good SEO meta tags and Open Graph data for social sharing. Performance appears moderate with asynchronous loading of analytics scripts. No CMS is explicitly detected, suggesting a custom or proprietary platform. Hosting provider details are not disclosed. Accessibility features are basic but present. Overall, the technical implementation is modern and functional with opportunities to enhance security and accessibility.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Earlier scans of this domain

  1. 58/100Medium34 findingsView report
Reviews of this site

Share your experience with kofola.cz. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review kofola.cz.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.