Skip to main content

Security report for koemelkallergie.nl

Nutricia · Healthcare · Netherlands

Low risk. 2 critical or high findings in SSL/TLS and DNS health.

Security score

79/100

Risk levelLow

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Koemelkallergie.nl is a professionally maintained healthcare information website focused on cow's milk allergy in young children, operated as an initiative by Nutricia, a recognized healthcare nutrition brand. The site provides educational content, practical dietary advice, recipes, and customer support channels including phone and WhatsApp. It targets parents and caregivers in the Netherlands, positioning itself as a trusted resource in the healthcare nutrition sector. Technically, the site is built on Adobe Experience Manager hosted on Adobe's cloud platform, leveraging modern web technologies and privacy-compliant tracking tools. Security posture is strong with HTTPS and cookie consent mechanisms, though it lacks explicit security policies or incident response contacts. Overall, the website demonstrates good content quality, technical implementation, and business credibility, making it a reliable resource for its audience.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
83/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

2 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

  2. DNS health

    DNS sends visitors and email to the right servers. Misconfigured records can cause outages or let someone redirect your traffic.

    • High

      Unregistered MX Record

      MX record points to unregistered domain: smtp.domainnetwork.net

      What to do: Remove or fix MX record pointing to unregistered domain

      • RFC 5321 §5.1
      • NIS2 21(2)(i)
      • IR 2024/2690 12.4: Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690, Annex point 12.4: Asset inventory
      • NIST CM-8: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 CM-8: System Component Inventory

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching koemelkallergie.nl

This scan found 17 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
82
Security headers
85
Email security
70
DNS health
55
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
83
Average
79

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The website supports Nutricia's healthcare nutrition business by providing specialized information on cow's milk allergy, a niche but important market segment. Its business model appears to be informational and supportive, likely complementing Nutricia's product offerings. The site benefits from strong brand association with Nutricia and Danone, enhancing trust and market positioning. The presence of multiple related Nutricia domains indicates a well-structured brand ecosystem targeting both consumers and professionals. The site’s content and contact options suggest a customer-centric approach, facilitating engagement and support. Growth potential lies in expanding educational resources and integrating more interactive tools for caregivers.

Security posture

The website employs HTTPS and includes cookie consent mechanisms, reflecting compliance with GDPR and privacy best practices. Use of Google Tag Manager and TrustCommander indicates controlled data collection. However, the absence of explicit security headers and a published security policy or incident response contact reduces transparency in security management. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the content. The security posture is adequate for an informational healthcare site but could be improved by adding security headers and formal incident response information to enhance trust and resilience.

Recommendations

  1. Implement HTTP security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to strengthen browser security.
  2. Publish a clear security policy and provide incident response contact information to improve transparency and preparedness.
  3. Add a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file to facilitate responsible reporting of security issues.
  4. Enhance accessibility features to improve usability for all users, including those with disabilities.
  5. Regularly review and update privacy and cookie policies to maintain compliance with evolving regulations.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Nutricia
Description
Koemelkallergie.nl is an informational website focused on cow's milk allergy in young children, providing practical tips, recipes, and guidance. It is an initiative by Nutricia.
Key services
Educational content on cow's milk allergy, Dietary advice and recipes, Customer support via phone and WhatsApp
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Adobe Experience Manager (AEM), Adobe Helix RUM, Google Tag Manager, TrustCommander Privacy Script
Frameworks
Adobe AEM
Platforms
Adobe AEM Cloud
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Use of Google Tag Manager with privacy category
  • Cookie consent banner with management options

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Marketing tools
TrustCommander Privacy Script
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with rich content about cow's milk allergy.
  2. Strong branding with Nutricia and Danone association.
  3. Good privacy and cookie compliance with visible banners and policies.
  4. No visible security policy or incident response contacts.
  5. No suspicious or malicious content detected.
  6. Use of modern CMS and cloud hosting platform.
  7. Contact options include phone and WhatsApp with clear context.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on Adobe Experience Manager, a robust enterprise CMS, hosted on Adobe's cloud infrastructure, ensuring scalability and reliability. It uses modern JavaScript libraries and asynchronous loading for performance optimization. The site includes structured data (JSON-LD) for SEO and social media integration via Open Graph and Twitter cards. Performance is moderate with good mobile optimization and SEO practices. Some technical debt is noted in missing security headers and limited accessibility features. Overall, the technical infrastructure supports a professional and user-friendly experience but could benefit from security and accessibility enhancements.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with koemelkallergie.nl. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review koemelkallergie.nl.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.