Skip to main content

Security report for kodeksprzejrzystosci.pl

Związek Pracodawców Innowacyjnych Firm Farmaceutycznych INFARMA · Healthcare · Poland

Medium risk. 10 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 2 other checks.

Security score

54/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

The website www.kodeksprzejrzystosci.pl represents the Związek Pracodawców Innowacyjnych Firm Farmaceutycznych INFARMA, a Polish association of innovative pharmaceutical companies focused on promoting transparency in cooperation with healthcare professionals and patient organizations. The site provides information about the Transparency Code, publishes annual transparency reports, and serves as a resource for industry standards and ethical cooperation. The organization holds a significant position in the Polish pharmaceutical sector, with affiliations to European bodies such as EFPIA. Technically, the website employs modern web technologies including Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, and Google reCAPTCHA v3 for security. It uses HTTPS exclusively, ensuring secure communication. The site is well-structured, mobile-optimized, and includes privacy and cookie policies compliant with GDPR. However, no explicit security headers were detected, and WHOIS data for the domain is unavailable, which slightly impacts trustworthiness. From a security perspective, the site demonstrates good practices such as HTTPS enforcement and bot protection via reCAPTCHA. There are no visible vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data. The absence of WHOIS data is a concern but is mitigated by the professional content and clear organizational affiliations. Overall, the site presents a low risk profile with room for improvement in security headers and incident response transparency. Strategically, the site supports INFARMA's mission to enhance transparency and ethical standards in the pharmaceutical industry in Poland, targeting healthcare professionals, patient groups, and industry stakeholders.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
10/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

10 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching kodeksprzejrzystosci.pl

This scan found 25 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
65
Security headers
20
Email security
70
DNS health
60
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
10
Average
54

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

INFARMA operates as an important industry association within the healthcare sector in Poland, representing innovative pharmaceutical companies. Its business model centers on self-regulation, transparency reporting, and ethical cooperation standards. The organization leverages partnerships with European and national bodies to strengthen its market position. Revenue streams likely include membership fees and industry collaborations. The target customers are pharmaceutical companies, healthcare professionals, and patient organizations. The presence of numerous well-known pharmaceutical companies as signatories indicates strong industry integration and influence. Growth indicators include ongoing publication of transparency reports and consolidation of codes of practice. The partnership ecosystem is robust, involving EFPIA and other key stakeholders, enhancing credibility and reach.

Security posture

The website exhibits a mature security posture with HTTPS enforced and use of Google reCAPTCHA v3 to mitigate automated abuse. No security headers such as Content-Security-Policy or X-Frame-Options were detected, representing an area for improvement. There is no evidence of exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries in the HTML content. Privacy compliance is well addressed with clear cookie consent and a comprehensive privacy policy. Incident response and vulnerability disclosure information are absent, which could be enhanced to improve security readiness. Overall, the security culture appears professional but could benefit from formalized policies and additional technical controls.

Recommendations

  1. Implement security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to enhance protection against common web attacks.
  2. Publish an incident response policy and provide clear contact channels for security incidents to improve transparency and readiness.
  3. Regularly audit and update third-party libraries and scripts to mitigate potential vulnerabilities.
  4. Enhance accessibility features to improve compliance and user experience for all visitors.
  5. Consider obtaining and displaying relevant security or privacy certifications to strengthen trust signals.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
Związek Pracodawców Innowacyjnych Firm Farmaceutycznych INFARMA
VAT number
NIP 5213402914
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Związek Pracodawców Innowacyjnych Firm Farmaceutycznych INFARMA
Description
Inicjatywa samoregulacyjna innowacyjnych firm farmaceutycznych w Polsce, promująca transparentność współpracy branży farmaceutycznej z przedstawicielami zawodów medycznych, organizacjami ochrony zdrowia oraz organizacjami pacjentów.
Key services
Kodeks Przejrzystości, Publikacja raportów przejrzystości współpracy, Edukacja i standaryzacja współpracy branży farmaceutycznej
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, Google reCAPTCHA v3, jQuery (implied by usage of colorbox and scripts), Bootstrap CSS
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Use of Google reCAPTCHA v3 for bot protection
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Marketing tools
AddThis
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenge.
  2. Content is focused on transparency in pharmaceutical industry cooperation in Poland.
  3. Strong presence of official and partner links to reputable pharmaceutical companies and organizations.
  4. Use of modern web technologies and analytics tools.
  5. Privacy and cookie policies are present and GDPR compliant.
  6. WHOIS data is unavailable, which is unusual but not uncommon for .pl domains; this reduces domain trust slightly.
  7. No signs of security vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data in the HTML content.
  8. Contact information is complete and professional.
  9. No adult or questionable content detected.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a custom PHP backend with CSS and JavaScript assets dynamically served via PHP scripts. It uses Bootstrap for responsive design and Google Fonts for typography. Analytics and tracking are implemented via Google Analytics and Google Tag Manager, with reCAPTCHA v3 integrated for bot protection. The site loads moderately fast and is mobile optimized. There is no detected CMS, suggesting a custom or proprietary platform. The hosting provider is not explicitly identified. The site uses modern web standards and meta tags for SEO. Technical debt appears low, but the absence of security headers and explicit accessibility features indicates areas for modernization. Overall, the technical infrastructure supports the business goals effectively with moderate performance.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with kodeksprzejrzystosci.pl. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review kodeksprzejrzystosci.pl.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.