Skip to main content

Security report for kodax.com

Korea Digital Asset Co., Ltd. · Finance · South Korea

Medium risk. 5 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

70/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Korea Digital Asset Co., Ltd. (KODA) is a Korean company specializing in digital asset custody services primarily targeting corporate and institutional investors. Backed by KB Kookmin Bank, KODA offers secure bitcoin custody, legal, accounting, and tax advisory services, positioning itself as a leading player in the Korean digital asset custody market with over 80% market share. The website is professionally designed, fully accessible, and optimized for mobile devices, reflecting a mature digital presence. Technically, the site uses modern frameworks such as React and Gatsby, hosted with Google Cloud DNS, and integrates Google Analytics for user tracking. Security posture is strong with HTTPS, ISMS certification, cold wallet storage, MPC key management, and multi-factor authentication, though it lacks some HTTP security headers and DNSSEC. Privacy compliance is partial, with a privacy policy present but no cookie consent mechanism or GDPR-specific indicators. Contact information is limited to a company email address. Overall, the site is trustworthy and professional, with minor areas for improvement in privacy and security transparency.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
53/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

5 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  3. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1
    • High

      Weak SSL Key Length

      SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

      What to do: Use at least 2048-bit RSA or 256-bit ECC key

      • CWE-326
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • Mozilla TLS: Mozilla Server Side TLS 6.0 intermediate: rsa_key_size 2048

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching kodax.com

This scan found 23 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
52
Security headers
65
Email security
75
DNS health
75
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
53
Average
70

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

KODA operates in the finance sector, focusing on digital asset custody for institutional clients. Its competitive advantage lies in its backing by a major Korean bank and comprehensive service offerings including custody, legal, and tax advisory. The business model is service-oriented, generating revenue from custody fees and advisory services. The company has demonstrated growth and market leadership, supported by multiple media reports and strategic partnerships. The target customers are corporate and institutional investors requiring secure digital asset management. The company maintains a consistent brand image and strong trust signals such as ISMS certification and regulatory compliance. No subsidiaries or partner domains were identified from the website content.

Security posture

KODA exhibits a mature security posture with ISMS certification and adherence to Korean virtual asset regulations. Key security controls include cold wallet storage, MPC key management to prevent single point key compromise, OTP two-factor authentication, and IP whitelisting. The website enforces HTTPS and integrates Google Tag Manager securely. However, the absence of security headers like Content-Security-Policy and lack of DNSSEC implementation represent areas for enhancement. No public incident response or vulnerability disclosure policies were found, which could impact transparency and trust. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the website content. Overall, the security posture is strong but could be improved with additional security best practices and transparency.

Recommendations

  1. Enable DNSSEC on the domain to enhance DNS security and prevent spoofing.
  2. Implement HTTP security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to mitigate common web attacks.
  3. Publish an incident response contact and vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file to improve transparency and trust.
  4. Add a cookie policy and consent mechanism to comply with privacy regulations and improve user trust.
  5. Expand contact information to include phone numbers and physical address to enhance business credibility.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Korea Digital Asset Co., Ltd.
Description
한국디지털에셋(KODA, 코다)는 KB국민은행이 직접 출자한 법인으로, 비트코인 수탁 등 법인·기관 투자자를 위한 디지털 자산 원스탑 서비스를 제공합니다.
Key services
디지털 자산 수탁, 콜드월렛 보관, MPC 시스템, 법률·회계·세무 자문, 가이드라인 제공, 증빙서류 발급
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
React, Gatsby, Google Tag Manager
Frameworks
Gatsby
Performance
fast
Mobile
excellent
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • ISMS certification
  • Use of MPC system for key management
  • Cold wallet storage
  • OTP two-factor authentication
  • IP whitelisting

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Google Analytics (via Google Tag Manager)
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges.
  2. Content is professionally presented in Korean targeting institutional investors.
  3. Strong trust signals including ISMS certification and KB Kookmin Bank backing.
  4. No explicit privacy or cookie consent banners detected, which could be improved.
  5. Technical stack is modern and performance optimized.
  6. Security posture is strong but could benefit from additional HTTP security headers and DNSSEC.
  7. Contact information is limited to email only; no phone or physical address found.
  8. No vulnerability disclosure or incident response contact information publicly available.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built using modern web technologies including React and Gatsby, ensuring fast performance and good SEO. Hosting uses Google Cloud DNS with multiple Google nameservers, indicating reliable infrastructure. The site is mobile optimized with responsive design and good accessibility features. Google Tag Manager is used for analytics, indicating a moderate level of user tracking. No CMS was detected, suggesting a custom or static site generation approach. The site lacks DNSSEC and HTTP security headers, which are recommended for improved security posture. Overall, the technical implementation is modern, performant, and professional with minor security enhancements recommended.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with kodax.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review kodax.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.