Skip to main content

Security report for koda.dk

Koda · Media · Denmark

Low risk. 3 critical or high findings in Security headers, SSL/TLS and 1 other check.

Security score

80/100

Risk levelLow

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Koda is a well-established Danish organization focused on music rights management, ensuring that music creators and publishers receive payment for the use of their music. The website reflects a professional presence with a clear focus on supporting a stronger music life socially, economically, and environmentally. The business operates primarily in the media sector with a large organizational size and a history dating back to 1996. Technically, the website is built on modern frameworks such as Next.js and React, integrating advanced cookie consent mechanisms via Cookiebot and leveraging Google Tag Manager and analytics tools for traffic and user behavior analysis. Security posture is adequate with HTTPS enabled and cookie consent implemented, but lacks explicit security headers and published security policies. Privacy compliance is partially met with a cookie consent banner but lacks a visible privacy policy and terms of service. Overall, the domain is legitimate, long-standing, and consistent with the business claims. Strategic recommendations include publishing comprehensive privacy and security policies, enhancing security headers, and providing clear contact information to improve trust and compliance.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
88/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

3 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak SSL Key Length

      SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

      What to do: Use at least 2048-bit RSA or 256-bit ECC key

      • CWE-326
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • Mozilla TLS: Mozilla Server Side TLS 6.0 intermediate: rsa_key_size 2048
  3. DNS health

    DNS sends visitors and email to the right servers. Misconfigured records can cause outages or let someone redirect your traffic.

    • High

      Domain Expires Soon

      Domain expires in 5 days

      What to do: Renew domain registration before expiration

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching koda.dk

This scan found 14 issues across 5 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
75
Security headers
60
Email security
100
DNS health
55
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
88
Average
80

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention koda.dk, from OffSeq Breach.

Total records
218
Employees
0
Customers
218
Third parties
0
Weak passwords
11%

4 subdomains affected

See the 10 newest leaked credentials

A one-off add-on to this report that lists the most recent identifier and password pairs OffSeq Breach holds for koda.dk.

Select it in the checkout above.

Breach keeps ingesting new leaks, so these numbers can grow between scans.

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Koda holds a strong market position in the Danish music rights management industry, serving music creators, publishers, and stakeholders in the music ecosystem. Its business model revolves around collecting and distributing royalties for music usage, supported by a digital platform that manages rights and payments. The company leverages partnerships with major platforms such as Google, Facebook, LinkedIn, Vimeo, and YouTube for content delivery and marketing. The website's extensive use of tracking and advertising technologies indicates a mature digital marketing strategy aimed at audience engagement and monetization. The absence of explicit contact details and privacy policies suggests areas for operational improvement in customer engagement and regulatory compliance.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a moderate security maturity level with HTTPS enforced and a robust cookie consent mechanism. However, the lack of security headers such as Content Security Policy (CSP), HTTP Strict Transport Security (HSTS), and X-Frame-Options reduces its defense-in-depth posture. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the provided content. The absence of a published security policy, incident response contacts, or vulnerability disclosure program limits transparency and preparedness for security incidents. Compliance with GDPR is partially indicated by cookie consent but lacks full documentation. Enhancing these areas would significantly improve the security posture and regulatory compliance.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a comprehensive privacy policy and terms of service accessible from the website footer or main navigation.
  2. Implement and publish a security.txt file to facilitate responsible vulnerability disclosure.
  3. Add essential security headers including CSP, HSTS, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options.
  4. Provide clear contact information including emails and phone numbers for general and security-related inquiries.
  5. Enable DNSSEC on the domain to strengthen DNS security and prevent spoofing.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Koda
Description
Koda sørger for, at musikskabere og musikforlag modtager betaling for brugen af musik, og arbejder for et stærkere musikliv socialt, økonomisk og miljømæssigt.
Key services
Musikrettighedsforvaltning, Betaling for musikbrug, Støtte til musiklivets udvikling
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Next.js, React, Cookiebot, Google Tag Manager, Google Analytics, Cloudflare (implied by cookies)
Frameworks
Next.js
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled
  • Cookie consent mechanism implemented

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Hotjar, Piwik Pro
Tracking level
extensive
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Ad networks
Google DoubleClick, Meta Platforms (Facebook)
Tracking pixels
Hotjar, Facebook Pixel
Marketing tools
Google Ads, Facebook Ads
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website uses a comprehensive cookie consent mechanism via Cookiebot.
  2. No explicit privacy policy or terms of service found in the provided content.
  3. No contact emails or phone numbers explicitly found in the HTML content.
  4. Multiple third-party tracking and advertising services are used, with detailed cookie disclosures.
  5. Website is built with modern web technologies (Next.js, React).
  6. Domain is old and active, registered with a reputable registrar.
  7. No WAF or blocking mechanisms detected; content is fully accessible.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built using modern web technologies, primarily Next.js and React, indicating a contemporary and scalable technical infrastructure. Integration with Cookiebot ensures compliance with cookie consent regulations. The use of Google Tag Manager and analytics services like Hotjar and Piwik Pro supports advanced user behavior tracking and marketing analytics. Performance is moderate with good mobile optimization and basic accessibility features. The domain is registered with a reputable registrar and has a long history, supporting operational stability. Opportunities exist to improve technical security configurations and enhance privacy compliance documentation.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with koda.dk. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review koda.dk.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.