Skip to main content

Security report for knatmoda.lv

Kultūras nams Atmoda · Hospitality · Latvia

Medium risk. 4 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

73/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Kultūras nams Atmoda is a hospitality business located in Riga, Latvia, operating as a culture house and restaurant offering food delivery, takeaway, table reservations, and event hosting services. The website presents a professional and user-friendly interface with clear navigation, comprehensive contact information, and active social media presence. The business targets local customers and event attendees seeking dining and cultural experiences. Technically, the website is built on modern frameworks such as Next.js and integrates secure payment processing via Adyen, supported by Cloudflare CDN and analytics tools. Security posture is strong with HTTPS enforcement and security headers, though no explicit security policy or incident response information is published. Privacy and cookie policies are present and GDPR compliant, enhancing user trust. Overall, the site is well-optimized for performance, mobile use, and SEO, reflecting a mature digital presence for a small hospitality business.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
68/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

4 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  3. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching knatmoda.lv

This scan found 21 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
50
Email security
85
DNS health
65
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
68
Average
73

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The business operates in the hospitality sector, focusing on food services and cultural events in Riga. It leverages an online platform for menu display, ordering, and reservations, supported by ChoiceQR technology. The company maintains active engagement through Facebook and Instagram, and uses WhatsApp and TripAdvisor for customer interaction and reputation management. The business model combines dine-in, takeaway, and delivery services with event hosting, catering to a diverse customer base. While the domain WHOIS data is unavailable, the website content and contact details align with a legitimate local business. No parent or subsidiary companies are identified. The presence of promotional codes, loyalty programs, and online payment options indicates a customer-centric approach with growth potential.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a solid security foundation with HTTPS enabled and multiple security headers implemented, including HSTS and Content Security Policy. Payment processing is handled by Adyen, a reputable provider, reducing risk exposure. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the HTML content. However, the absence of a publicly available security policy or incident response contact limits transparency. There is no evidence of vulnerability disclosure programs or security.txt files. Privacy compliance is well addressed with clear cookie consent mechanisms and GDPR-aligned policies. Overall, the security posture is good but could be improved by publishing formal security and incident response documentation.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a dedicated security policy page outlining security practices and user data protection.
  2. Add incident response contact information or abuse email to facilitate reporting of security issues.
  3. Consider implementing a vulnerability disclosure program or security.txt file to enhance transparency.
  4. Regularly review and update privacy and cookie policies to maintain GDPR compliance.
  5. Enhance accessibility features to improve inclusivity and compliance with standards.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Kultūras nams Atmoda
Description
Nams Rīgas centrā koncertiem, pasākumiem un sarunām ar gardiem ēdieniem un lielisku bāru. Mājīgas telpas jūsu svinībām un privātiem pasākumiem.
Key services
Food delivery, Takeaway, Table reservation, Event hosting, Bar services
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
React (Next.js), Google Fonts (Poppins), Swiper.js (carousel), Cloudflare Insights, Adyen payment integration
Frameworks
Next.js
Platforms
Web
Performance
fast
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Security headers present
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Use of secure payment provider (Adyen)

Analytics and tracking

Services
Cloudflare Insights, Google Analytics (implied by Google Tag Manager)
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Facebook Pixel, Cloudflare Insights
Marketing tools
Facebook Pixel
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is a hospitality venue in Riga, Latvia offering food and event services.
  2. Content is professionally presented with clear navigation and contact info.
  3. Privacy, cookie, and terms policies are present and accessible.
  4. No WHOIS data available due to query limit error; no registrar or domain age info.
  5. No security policy or incident response info published on site.
  6. Uses modern web technologies and secure payment integration.
  7. No adult or questionable content detected.
  8. Social media presence is active and linked.
  9. No signs of blocking or WAF interference.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built using Next.js, a modern React framework, ensuring server-side rendering and good performance. It uses Google Fonts for typography and Swiper.js for interactive carousels. Hosting and CDN services appear to be provided by Cloudflare, enhancing speed and security. Payment integration with Adyen ensures secure transactions. The site is mobile-optimized and SEO-friendly with proper meta tags and structured data (JSON-LD). Accessibility is basic but could be improved. No deprecated or vulnerable libraries were detected. Overall, the technical infrastructure is modern, performant, and well-maintained, supporting the business's digital needs effectively.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with knatmoda.lv. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review knatmoda.lv.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.