Skip to main content

Security report for klinika-malvazinky.cz

Klinika Malvazinky · Healthcare · Czech Republic

Medium risk. 7 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, SSL/TLS and 1 other check.

Security score

54/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Klinika Malvazinky is a prestigious rehabilitation clinic located in Prague, specializing in orthopedic surgery, physiotherapy, and rehabilitation services. It operates as part of the Group Mediterra healthcare network, offering modern medical care with a multidisciplinary team of highly qualified physicians. The clinic emphasizes patient comfort with a serene environment including a private park and comprehensive care programs. Technically, the website is built on WordPress and employs modern JavaScript libraries and Google services for analytics and security, including reCAPTCHA. The site is well-structured, mobile-optimized, and includes GDPR-compliant privacy and cookie policies. Security posture is strong with HTTPS and secure form handling, though some security headers could be improved. The absence of WHOIS data is a concern for domain legitimacy but does not detract from the professional presentation and trust signals on the site. Overall, the website reflects a mature digital presence suitable for a healthcare provider.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
10/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

7 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

    • High

      Third-party services without privacy policy

      Detected services: Google Analytics, Facebook, LinkedIn, YouTube, Google APIs

      What to do: Document all third-party data sharing in your privacy policy

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching klinika-malvazinky.cz

This scan found 22 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
75
Email security
70
DNS health
75
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
10
Average
54

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The clinic holds a strong market position as a specialized healthcare provider in rehabilitation and orthopedics within Prague and the Czech Republic. It benefits from accreditation by the Spojená akreditační komise (SAK), enhancing its credibility. The business model focuses on patient-centered care with a broad range of medical services and specialized programs such as telemedicine and preventive check-ups. The clinic is part of a larger healthcare group, which includes multiple hospitals and educational institutions, indicating a robust partnership ecosystem. The website's content and testimonials reinforce a high level of patient satisfaction and professional service delivery. Growth indicators include active social media engagement and regular news updates. The clinic targets patients requiring acute and long-term rehabilitation services, positioning itself as a leader in its sector.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a solid security posture with enforced HTTPS, integration of Google reCAPTCHA to prevent spam and abuse, and a cookie consent mechanism aligned with GDPR requirements. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were detected in the HTML content. However, the site lacks explicit security headers such as Content Security Policy (CSP), HTTP Strict Transport Security (HSTS), and X-Frame-Options, which are recommended to enhance protection against common web attacks. There is no visible security policy or incident response page, nor a vulnerability disclosure or security.txt file, which could improve transparency and readiness. Overall, the security maturity is good but could be enhanced by implementing additional HTTP headers and formalizing security policies.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive HTTP security headers including CSP, HSTS, X-Frame-Options, and X-XSS-Protection to strengthen defense against web vulnerabilities.
  2. Publish a dedicated security policy and incident response page to improve transparency and preparedness for security incidents.
  3. Create and maintain a vulnerability disclosure policy and security.txt file to facilitate responsible reporting of security issues.
  4. Regularly audit and update third-party scripts and plugins to mitigate risks from outdated or vulnerable components.
  5. Enhance accessibility features and conduct periodic security training to foster a strong security culture within the organization.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
Klinika Malvazinky
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Klinika Malvazinky
Description
Prestižní klinika s unikátní koncepcí zdravotní péče. Ortopedie, fyzioterapie a rehabilitace v Praze. Klinika poskytuje 24hodinovou akutní péči, multidisciplinární tým lékařů, moderní zdravotnické zařízení s vlastním parkem a širokým komplementem služeb.
Key services
Ortopedie, Fyzioterapie, Rehabilitace, Neurologie, Chirurgie, Interna, Klinická logopedie a psycholog, Klinická biochemie, RTG a sono, Nutriční poradenství
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
jQuery 3.5.1, Google Tag Manager, Google reCAPTCHA v3, Owl Carousel, Circle Progress, Lite YouTube Embed, mmenu
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Google reCAPTCHA integration
  • Cookie consent mechanism
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Google Analytics (via gtag.js), Seznam retargeting
Marketing tools
Google reCAPTCHA
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with rich content and multiple sections.
  2. No WHOIS data available, which is unusual and reduces domain trust.
  3. Website uses HTTPS with modern security practices but lacks some security headers.
  4. Cookie consent and privacy policy are implemented and GDPR compliant.
  5. Multiple social media channels are linked, indicating active engagement.
  6. Website is built on WordPress with common plugins and libraries.
  7. No signs of malware or phishing detected.
  8. Business is healthcare focused with clear services and accreditation.
  9. No terms of service or explicit security policy pages found.
  10. No vulnerability disclosure or security.txt found.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress CMS, utilizing popular JavaScript libraries such as jQuery, Owl Carousel for sliders, Circle Progress for animations, and Lite YouTube Embed for video content. Google Tag Manager and Google Analytics are used for tracking and analytics, with reCAPTCHA v3 integrated for bot protection. The site loads external fonts from Google Fonts and uses a responsive design approach for mobile optimization. Performance is moderate, with some room for improvement in loading speed and accessibility. The technical infrastructure is modern and well-maintained, but the absence of certain security headers and lack of explicit hosting provider information are noted. Overall, the technical implementation supports a professional and user-friendly experience.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with klinika-malvazinky.cz. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review klinika-malvazinky.cz.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.