Skaistuma un Veselības Klīnika ''Amela'' is a Latvian beauty and health clinic offering personalized facial and body care programs, including massages, waxing, and premium cosmetic products. The website presents a professional and consistent brand image with clear navigation and e-commerce capabilities. The technical infrastructure leverages modern JavaScript libraries, Cloudfront CDN hosting, and integrates Google Analytics and Facebook Pixel for marketing and analytics. Security posture is moderate with HTTPS enforced but lacks advanced security headers and cookie consent mechanisms. WHOIS data is unavailable due to query limits, limiting domain trust verification. Overall, the site is functional, user-friendly, and targets local customers seeking beauty and wellness services.
Scanned ·
NIS2 and GDPR posture
GDPR outside view
10/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7
NIS2 Art. 21(2)
a(a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
b(b) Incident handling: One indicator
c(c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
d(d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
e(e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
f(f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
g(g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
h(h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
i(i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
j(j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside
Partly checked
One indicator
Not visible from outside
This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.
GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.
Priority findings
9 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.
GDPR outside view
These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.
Critical
EU business without adequate privacy measures
EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements
What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures
High
No Privacy Policy found
GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy
What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently
Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.
High
Missing Strict-Transport-Security header
Forces HTTPS connections
What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"
This scan found 23 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.
Daily monitoring
Recommended
€25per month
TLS certificates and expiry
DNS records
SPF, DKIM and DMARC
Security headers
GDPR and NIS2 posture
Exposed services
Third-party trackers
Security score drift
Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.
Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.
Results by check
Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.
How this score is calculated
The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.
Counted in this score
SSL/TLS
75
Security headers
20
Email security
70
DNS health
75
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
10
Average
58
Not counted
NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.
Findings that cap the score at 49
Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.
The certificate is not trusted by browsers
The website is not served over HTTPS
A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
The page loads a script from a compromised source
The domain registration has expired
SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain
Partial scans
When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.
Risk levels
Critical0–25
High26–49
Medium50–75
Low76–100
Breach exposure
Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.
Dark web exposure
Add-on
Leaked records that mention klinika-amela.lv, from OffSeq Breach.
No leaked records found
Breach holds no records for klinika-amela.lv right now. New leaks arrive continuously, so monitoring on Breach alerts you if that changes.
Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.
Business context
Business profile
The clinic operates in the healthcare sector focusing on beauty and wellness services with a small business size. It offers a mix of in-clinic treatments and online sales of premium skincare products sourced from Switzerland and Italy. The business model combines service delivery with e-commerce. Social media presence on Facebook and Instagram supports marketing efforts. The website's market position is local with emphasis on quality and certified medical devices. No parent or subsidiary companies are identified. The absence of explicit contact details on the website may limit direct customer engagement.
Security posture
The website enforces HTTPS and uses secure login and registration forms, which is positive. However, it lacks important security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options, which are recommended to mitigate common web vulnerabilities. No visible vulnerability disclosure or incident response information is provided. The site does not display a cookie consent banner, which may impact GDPR compliance. Overall, the security maturity is moderate but could be improved by implementing recommended headers and privacy controls.
Recommendations
Implement Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options headers to enhance security.
Add a cookie consent banner and explicit cookie policy to improve privacy compliance.
Publish clear contact information including company emails and phone numbers to increase business credibility.
Establish and publish a vulnerability disclosure policy or security contact for incident response.
Obtain and provide WHOIS domain registration details or use a verified registrar to improve trust.
Site observations
Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.
Business
Company
Skaistuma un Veselības Klīnika ''Amela''
Description
Piedāvā individuāli izstrādātas programmas sejas un ķermeņa kopšanai, izmantojot kvalitatīvas medicīniskās ierīces un kosmētiskos līdzekļus no Šveices un Itālijas.
Key services
Sejas kosmetoloģija, Ķermeņa kosmetoloģija, Masāžas un rituāli, Vaksācija, Kosmētikas pārdošana
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent
Technology
Stack
jQuery 2.2.4, Fancybox 3, Bannerplay, Google Analytics, Facebook Pixel
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good
Security
Observed score
65/100
Good practices seen
HTTPS enforced
No exposed sensitive data in HTML
Secure login and registration forms
Analytics and tracking
Services
Google Analytics, Facebook Pixel
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic
Advertising
Tracking pixels
Facebook Pixel
Marketing tools
Facebook Pixel
Transparency
basic
Site quality
Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate
Key observations
Website is fully accessible with rich content in Latvian language.
No WHOIS data available due to query limit error.
Privacy policy and terms of service pages are present and linked.
No explicit contact emails or phone numbers found in visible content.
Social media presence on Facebook and Instagram is active.
Uses HTTPS with Cloudfront CDN hosting.
Includes e-commerce functionality with product catalog and shopping cart.
No advanced security headers detected; security posture moderate.
No cookie consent banner or explicit cookie policy detected.
No visible security incident response or vulnerability disclosure information.
Technical notes
Notes
The website uses Mozello CMS with a Cloudfront CDN for hosting, ensuring reasonable performance and availability. JavaScript libraries like jQuery 2.2.4 and Fancybox 3 are used for UI components. Google Analytics and Facebook Pixel are integrated for tracking and marketing. The site is mobile responsive with good SEO meta tags and structured navigation. However, some technical debt is noted in the use of older jQuery versions and missing security headers. Accessibility features are basic but present. Overall, the technical implementation supports business needs but could benefit from modernization and enhanced security practices.
Standards and sources
Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.
Reviews of this site
Share your experience with klinika-amela.lv. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.
Community rating
No published reviews yet. Be the first to review klinika-amela.lv.