Skip to main content

Security report for klikk.lv

KLIKK · Hospitality · Latvia

Medium risk. 7 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 1 other check.

Security score

65/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

KLIKK is a Latvian-based entertainment and sports center offering a variety of leisure activities including karting, trampoline zones, sports and dance classes, party hosting, and café services. The website targets families, youth, and sports enthusiasts, positioning itself as a local hub for active recreation and events. The business model revolves around direct customer engagement through bookings and event rentals. Technically, the site is built on WordPress using the Astra theme and Elementor page builder, supplemented by the Bookly appointment plugin for scheduling. The infrastructure includes modern tracking and analytics tools such as Google Analytics, Facebook Pixel, and Microsoft Clarity, indicating a moderate level of digital maturity. Security posture is good with HTTPS enforced and standard security headers present, though the absence of a public security policy and incident response contacts suggests room for improvement. Privacy compliance is strong with a clear privacy policy and cookie consent mechanism aligned with GDPR requirements. Overall, the website is professional, accessible, and trustworthy, though the lack of WHOIS transparency slightly reduces domain trust. Strategic recommendations include publishing security policies, enhancing accessibility, and maintaining plugin security to further strengthen the security posture.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
40/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

7 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      Third-party services without privacy policy

      Detected services: Google Analytics, Facebook, YouTube, Google APIs

      What to do: Document all third-party data sharing in your privacy policy

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching klikk.lv

This scan found 22 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
42
Security headers
35
Email security
85
DNS health
85
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
40
Average
65

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

KLIKK operates in the hospitality and entertainment sector, focusing on sports and family-oriented activities. Its competitive advantage lies in offering diverse services under one roof, including karting, trampoline parks, and event hosting. Revenue streams likely include activity fees, event rentals, and café sales. The target market includes local families and youth, with growth potential in expanding sports classes and partnerships. The website reflects a well-maintained digital presence with integrated marketing and analytics tools, supporting customer engagement and retention. Partnerships or subsidiaries are not evident from the data. The business appears to be a small-sized local enterprise with consistent branding and good content quality.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a moderate security maturity level with HTTPS enforced and multiple security headers implemented. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were detected in the HTML content. The presence of cookie consent and privacy policy indicates compliance with data protection regulations. However, the absence of a dedicated security policy page, incident response contacts, and vulnerability disclosure mechanisms suggests gaps in formal security governance. The use of third-party plugins necessitates regular security audits to mitigate risks. Overall, the security posture is adequate for a small business but could be enhanced by formalizing policies and improving transparency.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a clear security policy and incident response information on the website.
  2. Implement a vulnerability disclosure program or security.txt file to encourage responsible reporting.
  3. Enhance website accessibility to meet higher standards for users with disabilities.
  4. Regularly update and audit WordPress plugins and themes to prevent vulnerabilities.
  5. Increase transparency around business registration and domain ownership if possible.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
KLIKK
Description
KLIKK is a leisure and entertainment center offering sports activities, karting, trampoline zones, party rooms, and café services. They provide adventure camps, sports and dance classes, and event hosting including parties and room rentals.
Key services
Karting school and races, Trampoline park, Sports and dance classes, Party and event hosting, Room rental, Café services
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, Astra Theme, Elementor, Bookly Appointment Plugin, Google Tag Manager, Facebook Pixel, Microsoft Clarity
Frameworks
WordPress CMS, Elementor Page Builder
Platforms
Web
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent implemented
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Microsoft Clarity
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Facebook Pixel, Microsoft Clarity
Marketing tools
Facebook Pixel, Microsoft Clarity
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges
  2. Uses modern WordPress CMS with popular plugins and themes
  3. Implements GDPR-compliant cookie consent and privacy policy
  4. No visible security policy or incident response information
  5. No WHOIS data available due to query limits
  6. Content is family-friendly and focused on entertainment and sports
  7. Contact information is available via email and contact forms
  8. Tracking includes Google Analytics, Facebook Pixel, and Microsoft Clarity
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a modern WordPress CMS platform using the Astra theme and Elementor page builder, which provides flexibility and ease of content management. The integration of the Bookly plugin supports appointment and event booking functionalities. Performance is moderate with standard optimization; mobile responsiveness is good, ensuring usability across devices. SEO practices are evident through meta tags and structured data, though accessibility features are basic and could be improved. The site uses multiple analytics and marketing tools, including Google Tag Manager, Facebook Pixel, and Microsoft Clarity, indicating a data-driven approach to user engagement. Hosting provider details are not explicitly identified. Overall, the technical infrastructure is solid for a small to medium-sized entertainment business.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with klikk.lv. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review klikk.lv.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.