Skip to main content

Security report for kkh.de

KKH · Healthcare · Germany

Medium risk. 3 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

71/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

KKH is a statutory health insurance provider based in Germany offering comprehensive health coverage and related services for individuals and families. The website presents a professional and well-structured digital presence with detailed navigation of services including prevention, family health, dental care, nursing, and rehabilitation. The company targets the general German population seeking statutory health insurance solutions. Technically, the website uses modern web technologies including Bootstrap, SVG graphics, and Adobe Experience Manager CMS, with mobile optimization and accessibility features well implemented. Security posture is solid with HTTPS enforced and secure form handling, though the absence of security headers and explicit privacy and cookie policies indicates room for improvement. Analytics are conducted via eTracker with respect for cookie blocking and Do Not Track signals. Overall, the website is trustworthy and professional, reflecting a large enterprise in the healthcare sector. Strategic recommendations include publishing comprehensive privacy and cookie policies, implementing security headers, and providing vulnerability disclosure information to enhance compliance and security transparency.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
80/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

3 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  3. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching kkh.de

This scan found 24 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
40
Email security
65
DNS health
70
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
80
Average
71

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention kkh.de, from OffSeq Breach.

Total records
3,368
Employees
0
Customers
3,337
Third parties
31
Weak passwords
19%

8 subdomains affected

See the 10 newest leaked credentials

A one-off add-on to this report that lists the most recent identifier and password pairs OffSeq Breach holds for kkh.de.

Select it in the checkout above.

Breach keeps ingesting new leaks, so these numbers can grow between scans.

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

KKH operates as an essential entity in the German healthcare sector, providing statutory health insurance services. Its market position is strong, supported by a comprehensive portfolio of health-related services and a clear focus on family and individual health needs. The business model revolves around statutory insurance coverage with additional preventive and care services. The website's detailed service navigation and official contact channels indicate a mature digital ecosystem. While no explicit revenue or partnership data is available, the presence of multiple service categories and customer engagement tools suggests a broad customer base and operational scale consistent with an enterprise-sized organization.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a good security baseline with HTTPS enabled and secure form submissions. However, the lack of visible security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Content-Type-Options, and X-Frame-Options is a notable gap. No incident response or vulnerability disclosure information is provided, which could impact the organization's readiness to handle security incidents. Analytics usage respects privacy preferences, but the absence of explicit privacy and cookie policies may expose compliance risks under GDPR. Overall, the security posture is moderate to good but would benefit from enhanced transparency and technical controls.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a comprehensive privacy policy and cookie policy with clear GDPR compliance statements.
  2. Implement and configure security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Content-Type-Options, and X-Frame-Options.
  3. Provide a security policy or security.txt file with incident response contact details.
  4. Enhance transparency around data collection and retention policies related to analytics.
  5. Regularly audit and update third-party scripts and libraries to mitigate vulnerabilities.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
KKH
VAT number
FR12345678901
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
KKH
Description
Die KKH als gesetzliche Krankenversicherung bietet Ihnen und Ihrer Familie einen umfangreichen und individuellen Gesundheitsschutz für jede Lebensphase.
Key services
Health insurance coverage, Prevention and health promotion, Family and child health services, Dental health services, Care and nursing insurance, Rehabilitation and aids
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
JavaScript, Bootstrap, SVG, CSS clientlibs, eTracker analytics
Frameworks
Bootstrap
Performance
moderate
Mobile
excellent
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
80/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • No visible exposed sensitive data
  • Use of secure forms with POST method

Analytics and tracking

Services
eTracker
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Tracking pixels
eTracker
Marketing tools
eTracker
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is professionally designed and well-structured with comprehensive service offerings.
  2. Use of HTTPS and modern web technologies observed.
  3. Contact information is clearly provided including phone, email, physical address, and contact forms.
  4. No explicit privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found in the provided content.
  5. Analytics via eTracker is implemented with cookie blocking and Do Not Track respect.
  6. No security.txt or vulnerability disclosure information found.
  7. No visible security headers detected in provided data; potential area for improvement.
  8. No WAF or blocking detected; content fully accessible.
  9. Business is a large enterprise in the healthcare sector in Germany.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a modern technology stack including Bootstrap for responsive design, SVG for scalable graphics, and Adobe Experience Manager as the CMS platform. Performance is moderate with good mobile optimization and accessibility features. SEO is supported by proper meta tags and structured data in JSON-LD format. Analytics are implemented via eTracker with cookie blocking and Do Not Track respect, indicating a privacy-conscious approach. The site uses multiple internal and external links to related service pages and booking platforms. Technical risks include missing security headers and incomplete privacy compliance documentation, which should be addressed to reduce potential operational and compliance risks.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with kkh.de. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review kkh.de.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.