Skip to main content

Security report for kjtz.co

Knock Knock WHOIS Not There, LLC · Media · United States

Medium risk. 7 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 2 other checks.

Security score

63/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

The website jungespublikum.blog is a German-language cultural blog dedicated to performing arts and young audiences, providing networking, event information, funding, and research dissemination. It is hosted on WordPress.com and registered via Automattic Inc., with domain registration dating from 2023, consistent with the site's recent content. The platform targets professionals and stakeholders in the cultural and performing arts sectors, operating as a small non-profit media entity. Technically, the site uses WordPress with Jetpack and Gutenberg, delivering a modern and moderately performant user experience with good mobile optimization and basic accessibility. Security posture is solid with HTTPS enforced and domain transfer protection, though DNSSEC is not enabled and explicit security headers are not visible. Privacy compliance is weak, lacking visible privacy or cookie policies and consent mechanisms. Contact is primarily via a blog subscription form, with no direct emails or phone numbers published. Social media presence is established across major platforms. Overall, the site is trustworthy and professionally maintained but would benefit from enhanced privacy disclosures and security hardening.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
58/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

7 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  3. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • High

      No DMARC record found

      DMARC provides email authentication and reporting

      What to do: Add DMARC record: "v=DMARC1; p=none; rua=mailto:dmarc@yourdomain.com"

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching kjtz.co

This scan found 23 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
42
Security headers
30
Email security
65
DNS health
80
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
58
Average
63

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The site occupies a niche in the cultural media sector, focusing on performing arts for young audiences. Its business model is informational and network-oriented, likely funded or supported by cultural institutions or grants. The partnership with kjtz.co suggests collaboration within the cultural community. The site maintains consistent branding and regularly updated content, indicating active engagement. Revenue streams are not explicit but may include sponsorships or institutional support. The target audience includes cultural professionals, researchers, and event organizers. Growth indicators include frequent posts and social media activity. The site leverages WordPress.com infrastructure, reducing operational overhead but limiting customization. Strategic observations include the need for improved privacy and security transparency to enhance credibility.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a good baseline security posture with HTTPS enforced and domain status set to clientTransferProhibited, preventing unauthorized transfers. Hosting on WordPress.com provides inherent security benefits, including managed updates and infrastructure protections. However, DNSSEC is not enabled, which could improve DNS security. No explicit security policies, incident response contacts, or vulnerability disclosure mechanisms are published, indicating limited transparency in security governance. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were detected in the HTML content. Forms are standard WordPress subscription forms without visible advanced security controls. Overall, the site is secure for its purpose but could improve by publishing security policies and enabling DNSSEC.

Recommendations

  1. Enable DNSSEC on the domain to enhance DNS security and prevent spoofing.
  2. Publish a comprehensive privacy policy and cookie policy with GDPR compliance details.
  3. Implement a cookie consent mechanism to comply with privacy regulations.
  4. Provide clear contact information including security incident response contacts.
  5. Add explicit security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and Referrer-Policy to improve security posture.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Knock Knock WHOIS Not There, LLC
Description
Netzwerkarbeit, Veranstaltungen, Förderung, Forschung in the field of performing arts and young audiences
Key services
Networking, Event information, Funding information, Research dissemination
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, Jetpack plugin, Google Fonts, JavaScript, CSS
Frameworks
Gutenberg
Platforms
WordPress.com
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
80/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • ClientTransferProhibited domain status
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
WordPress.com Stats
Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Tracking pixels
wordpress.com pixel
Marketing tools
Jetpack Subscriptions
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is a German-language cultural blog focused on performing arts and young audiences
  2. Hosted on WordPress.com with Automattic as registrar and hosting provider
  3. No explicit privacy, cookie, or terms of service pages found
  4. Contact is primarily via blog subscription form; no direct emails or phone numbers found
  5. Social media presence on Facebook, Instagram, YouTube, Twitter
  6. Uses modern web technologies and WordPress plugins
  7. No security or incident response policies publicly disclosed
  8. No vulnerability disclosure or security.txt found
  9. No business certifications or DPO contact information found
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress CMS hosted by Automattic Inc. It uses Jetpack and Gutenberg plugins, Google Fonts, and standard JavaScript libraries. The site loads CSS and JS resources from WordPress.com CDN, ensuring good availability and performance. The HTML is valid and well-structured, with meta tags for SEO and Open Graph for social sharing. Mobile optimization is good with responsive design. Accessibility is basic but present with skip links and ARIA labels. Performance is moderate, typical for WordPress.com hosted blogs. There is no indication of technical debt or outdated libraries. Opportunities exist to improve security headers and privacy compliance. Overall, the technical infrastructure is modern and stable, suitable for a small cultural blog.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with kjtz.co. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review kjtz.co.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.