Skip to main content

Security report for kjl-mr.cz

Klinika JL · Healthcare · Czech Republic

Medium risk. 8 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view and Security headers.

Security score

63/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Klinika JL operates a specialized MRI diagnostic service in Prague, Czech Republic, with over 15 years of experience. The clinic uses advanced Philips Ingenia 3 Tesla MRI scanners to provide diagnostic imaging primarily for neurology, neurochirurgy, gastroenterology, gynecology, orthopedics, and oncology. The website is professionally designed using WordPress and modern plugins, offering online appointment booking and contact forms with file upload capabilities. The target audience is local patients seeking high-quality MRI diagnostics. Technically, the site employs a robust WordPress infrastructure with popular plugins and Google services for analytics and marketing. Security posture is moderate with HTTPS enabled and reCAPTCHA on forms, but lacks some security headers and cookie consent mechanisms. WHOIS data is missing, which impacts domain trustworthiness, though the site content and business information appear legitimate and professional.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
10/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

8 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching kjl-mr.cz

This scan found 22 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
95
Security headers
15
Email security
85
DNS health
75
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
10
Average
63

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention kjl-mr.cz, from OffSeq Breach.

No leaked records found

Breach holds no records for kjl-mr.cz right now. New leaks arrive continuously, so monitoring on Breach alerts you if that changes.

Monitor on Breach (opens in a new tab)

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The clinic holds a stable market position as a local healthcare provider with a niche focus on MRI diagnostics. Its business model revolves around direct patient services with insurance options indicated on the form. The website supports patient engagement through online booking and document uploads. The absence of WHOIS data is a concern but does not negate the visible operational maturity. Marketing efforts include Google Ads and Tag Manager, indicating active customer acquisition strategies. The clinic targets patients requiring advanced imaging diagnostics, leveraging its 15-year history and modern equipment as competitive advantages.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a basic to moderate security maturity level. HTTPS is properly configured, and Google reCAPTCHA is implemented to protect forms from spam. However, the absence of key security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, HSTS, and X-Frame-Options reduces defense-in-depth. The file upload feature is restricted by file type and size, mitigating some risk. No incident response or security policy information is publicly available. The lack of WHOIS data and privacy compliance mechanisms like cookie consent banners are gaps in transparency and regulatory adherence. Overall, the site is functional and reasonably secure but would benefit from enhanced security controls and compliance features.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive security headers including Content-Security-Policy, HSTS, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options.
  2. Add a visible cookie consent banner to comply with GDPR and improve privacy transparency.
  3. Verify and update WHOIS domain registration information to improve trust and legitimacy.
  4. Conduct regular security audits and update WordPress core and plugins promptly to mitigate vulnerabilities.
  5. Publish a clear security policy and incident response contact information to enhance user trust and preparedness.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Klinika JL
Description
Provoz magnetické rezonance na klinice JL byl zahájen v roce 2009. K vyšetření používáme nejmodernější skener Philips Ingenia se silou magnetického pole 3 Tesla. MR vyšetření je určeno především pro indikace ze strany neurologie, neurochirurgie, gastroenterologie, gynekologie, ortopedie a onkologie.
Key services
MRI brain, MRI spine, MRI shoulder, MRI elbow, MRI wrist, MRI hip, MRI kidneys, MRI pancreas, MRI liver, MRCP (bile ducts)
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, PHP, jQuery, Booking Calendar plugin, Contact Form 7, WPForms, Elementor, Slider Revolution, Google reCAPTCHA, Select2, Magnific Popup, GSAP animation
Frameworks
WordPress
Platforms
Web
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
70/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled
  • Google reCAPTCHA on forms
  • File upload restrictions on form (allowed extensions and max size)

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Ad networks
Google Ads
Marketing tools
Google Ads
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is a professional healthcare service site specializing in MRI diagnostics.
  2. Content is in Czech language and targeted at local patients.
  3. No WHOIS data available, which is unusual and reduces domain trust.
  4. Site uses modern WordPress plugins and technologies.
  5. No explicit privacy or cookie banners found on site, but privacy policy linked externally.
  6. No security headers detected; HTTPS is enabled.
  7. Contact form collects personal data including file uploads with restrictions.
  8. No signs of adult or questionable content.
  9. Google Ads and Tag Manager used for marketing and analytics.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress with a modern tech stack including Elementor, Slider Revolution, WPForms, and Booking Calendar plugins. It uses jQuery and GSAP for animations and UI enhancements. Google services such as reCAPTCHA and Tag Manager are integrated for security and analytics. The site is mobile optimized with responsive design and uses select2 for enhanced form controls. Performance is moderate, with potential improvements in caching and asset optimization. Accessibility is basic but could be improved with ARIA roles and semantic HTML enhancements. SEO is supported by proper meta tags and structured data, though no JSON-LD schema was detected in the provided content. Overall, the technical implementation is solid but has room for modernization and optimization.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Earlier scans of this domain

  1. 62/100Medium32 findingsView report
Reviews of this site

Share your experience with kjl-mr.cz. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review kjl-mr.cz.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.