Skip to main content

Security report for kinkytom.com

Media · N/a

Medium risk. 7 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 3 other checks.

Security score

58/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Kinky Tom operates as an adult content aggregator specializing in free fetish porn, offering daily updates, video previews, and curated channel listings. The site targets adult audiences interested in niche fetish categories such as BDSM, femdom, and transex. Its business model appears to rely on advertising and affiliate marketing through free content previews and channel promotions. Technically, the site uses standard web technologies including jQuery and responsive HTML/CSS, providing a good user experience with clear navigation and mobile optimization. However, the absence of WHOIS registration data raises concerns about domain legitimacy and transparency. Security posture is moderate, with basic age verification and a cookie-free policy, but lacking security headers and explicit consent mechanisms. Overall, the site is functional and professionally presented but would benefit from improved security practices and clearer business transparency.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
68/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

7 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  3. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching kinkytom.com

This scan found 22 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
45
Email security
65
DNS health
80
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
68
Average
58

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The website occupies a niche segment in the adult media industry, focusing on fetish content aggregation. Its competitive advantage lies in daily updated free previews and a broad curated list of channels, appealing to a specialized audience. Revenue streams likely include advertising and affiliate commissions from promoted channels and studios. The lack of disclosed company information and WHOIS data limits full business intelligence assessment. The site maintains a minimal tracking footprint, which may appeal to privacy-conscious users. Growth indicators include frequent content updates and new channel additions. The partnership ecosystem is not explicitly disclosed, and no direct payment processing or subscription services are evident on the main site.

Security posture

Security maturity is basic. The site implements an adult content warning modal for age verification and explicitly states no use of cookies or tracking technologies, which supports user privacy. However, the absence of HTTPS verification details, security headers, and incident response contacts indicates gaps in security best practices. No vulnerability disclosure or security.txt files are present, limiting transparency for security researchers. The lack of WHOIS data further complicates trust assessment. There is no evidence of exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries in the provided content. Overall, the site should enhance its security posture by adopting HTTPS, adding security headers, and publishing security policies.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and enforce HTTPS with a valid SSL/TLS certificate to secure user connections.
  2. Add standard security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to mitigate common web attacks.
  3. Publish a clear security policy and incident response contact information to improve transparency and trust.
  4. Introduce a cookie consent mechanism if any tracking or cookies are introduced in the future to comply with privacy regulations.
  5. Verify and update WHOIS registration information to ensure domain legitimacy and improve business credibility.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Description
Kinky Tom is an extensive and expanding collection of free fetish porn sites, bringing daily updates with free video previews and new models from the porn and fetish industry. It offers curated lists of free porn channels, popular studio channels, and trials & discounts.
Key services
Free fetish porn site listings, Daily video previews, New model introductions, Channel curation, Discount and trial promotions
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
jQuery, HTML5, CSS3
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
60/100
Good practices seen
  • Adult content age verification modal
  • No cookies or tracking technologies used

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is an adult content aggregator with free fetish porn previews and channel listings.
  2. No WHOIS registration data available, which is unusual and reduces trust.
  3. No explicit email addresses or phone numbers found; contact is via web form only.
  4. No security.txt or vulnerability disclosure policy found.
  5. No security headers detected in the HTML content.
  6. No tracking cookies or analytics scripts detected; privacy respected in this regard.
  7. Site uses jQuery and standard HTML/CSS with responsive design.
  8. Adult content warning modal is implemented for age verification.
  9. Cookie policy states no cookies are used, but no consent mechanism is present.
  10. External links include Twitter share and Google redirect for exit.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built using standard web technologies including HTML5, CSS3, and jQuery. It features responsive design elements for mobile optimization and uses lazy loading for images to improve performance. The site lacks a detected CMS or advanced frameworks, indicating a custom or lightweight implementation. Performance is moderate with no explicit indicators of advanced optimization or CDN usage. Accessibility features are basic, with some semantic HTML but no ARIA landmarks or advanced accessibility aids detected. SEO is supported by meta tags including description and canonical links. No analytics or tracking scripts were detected, aligning with the stated cookie-free policy. Technical risks include missing HTTPS confirmation and lack of security headers.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with kinkytom.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review kinkytom.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.