Skip to main content

Security report for kink.ai

Kink.com · Media · N/a

Medium risk. 7 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

67/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Kink AI is an adult entertainment platform specializing in NSFW AI-powered roleplay chat and image generation, backed by the established brand Kink.com. The platform targets adult users interested in BDSM and kink-themed AI interactions, offering both guest and registered user experiences. Technically, the website employs modern web technologies including React, New Relic monitoring, Google Analytics, Facebook Pixel, and CCBill payment integration, indicating a mature digital infrastructure. Security posture is strong with HTTPS enforced and bot protection via Google reCAPTCHA, though explicit privacy and cookie policies are not found, which is a compliance gap. The WHOIS data is privacy protected, common for adult content sites, but this reduces transparency slightly. Overall, the site presents a professional and engaging user experience with moderate tracking and analytics usage.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
35/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

7 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching kink.ai

This scan found 22 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
75
Security headers
30
Email security
80
DNS health
80
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
35
Average
67

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention kink.ai, from OffSeq Breach.

Total records
231
Employees
0
Customers
231
Third parties
0
Weak passwords
10%

3 subdomains affected

See the 10 newest leaked credentials

A one-off add-on to this report that lists the most recent identifier and password pairs OffSeq Breach holds for kink.ai.

Select it in the checkout above.

Breach keeps ingesting new leaks, so these numbers can grow between scans.

Open in Breach(opens in a new tab)Monitor on Breach(opens in a new tab)

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The business leverages the Kink.com brand to position itself as a leader in NSFW AI adult entertainment, focusing on personalized AI characters and roleplay scenarios. Its business model likely includes subscription and pay-per-use revenue streams, supported by integrated payment services like CCBill. The target audience is adults 18+ interested in kink and BDSM fantasies. The platform's use of advanced AI technologies and large language models provides a competitive advantage. Partnerships with analytics and marketing services support user acquisition and engagement. The lack of visible contact information and privacy policies suggests room for improvement in transparency and compliance.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a good security posture with HTTPS enforced and use of Google reCAPTCHA v3 to mitigate automated abuse. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were detected in the HTML content. However, the absence of explicit security headers such as X-Frame-Options and Referrer-Policy is noted. There is no visible incident response or vulnerability disclosure information, which could be improved to enhance trust. The privacy policy and cookie consent mechanisms are not clearly presented, indicating potential compliance gaps with GDPR and other privacy regulations. Overall, the security maturity is moderate with opportunities for strengthening policies and transparency.

Recommendations

  1. Publish comprehensive privacy and cookie policies accessible from the main site.
  2. Implement and display a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file.
  3. Add explicit security headers like X-Frame-Options, Referrer-Policy, and Content-Security-Policy.
  4. Provide clear contact information for security incidents and general inquiries.
  5. Enhance accessibility features to meet compliance standards and improve user experience.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Kink.com
Description
Kink AI is a cutting-edge NSFW platform backed by the prestigious Kink.com, designed to cater to adult fantasies through advanced AI technologies.
Key services
NSFW AI Roleplay Chat, NSFW AI Image Generator, Virtual AI Characters, Guest and Registered User Access
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
React, New Relic Browser Agent, Google Tag Manager, Google Analytics (gtag.js), Facebook Pixel, Trackdesk, CCBill Payment Widget, Google reCAPTCHA v3
Frameworks
React
Platforms
Web
Performance
fast
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Use of Google reCAPTCHA v3
  • No exposed emails or sensitive data in HTML
  • Use of end-to-end encryption mentioned in content

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, New Relic, Facebook Pixel, Trackdesk
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Ad networks
Trackdesk
Tracking pixels
Facebook Pixel, New Relic Browser Agent
Marketing tools
Trackdesk
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with rich content and interactive features
  2. No explicit privacy, cookie, or terms of service pages found in the HTML content
  3. No direct contact emails or phone numbers visible on the main page
  4. Strong use of modern web technologies and analytics tools
  5. Focus on adult NSFW AI roleplay and image generation
  6. Use of Google reCAPTCHA v3 for bot protection
  7. No signs of WAF or blocking mechanisms
  8. WHOIS data is not publicly available, indicating privacy protection
  9. Branding consistent with Kink.com, a known adult entertainment company
Technical notes

Notes

The site is built on a modern React framework with extensive use of third-party analytics and monitoring tools such as New Relic, Google Analytics, Facebook Pixel, and Trackdesk. Payment processing is handled via CCBill, a known adult industry payment provider. The site loads efficiently with preloading of fonts and images, and is mobile optimized. The use of Google reCAPTCHA v3 indicates proactive bot mitigation. No CMS was detected, suggesting a custom or headless architecture. The technical stack is robust and supports a scalable, interactive user experience. Opportunities exist to improve accessibility and explicit security header implementation.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with kink.ai. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review kink.ai.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.