Skip to main content

Security report for kinggizzardandthelizardwizard.com

King Gizzard & The Lizard Wizard · Media · N/a

Medium risk. 7 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

60/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

King Gizzard & The Lizard Wizard is an established psychedelic rock band with an official website that serves as a hub for their music releases, concert information, merchandise sales, and video content. The site targets fans and music enthusiasts globally, providing a professional and consistent brand experience. The business model revolves around direct-to-fan sales and promotion of live events, supported by partnerships with regional merchandise distributors. Technically, the website is built on the Webflow platform, leveraging modern web technologies and integrations such as Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, Facebook Pixel, and Klaviyo for marketing and analytics. Hosting and domain registration are managed through Cloudflare, ensuring reliable performance and security. The site is mobile-optimized and offers a good user experience, though accessibility features could be enhanced. From a security perspective, the site uses HTTPS and has domain transfer protections in place but lacks DNSSEC and important security headers. There are no visible vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data, but the absence of privacy and cookie policies represents a compliance gap. User tracking is moderate due to multiple analytics and marketing tools. No incident response or security policy information is provided. Overall, the website is legitimate, professionally maintained, and safe for general audiences. Strategic improvements in privacy compliance, security headers, and accessibility would enhance trust and regulatory adherence.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
35/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

7 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching kinggizzardandthelizardwizard.com

This scan found 28 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
62
Security headers
30
Email security
55
DNS health
75
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
35
Average
60

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The band holds a strong market position within the psychedelic rock genre, with a dedicated fan base and international reach. Their revenue streams include music sales, merchandise, and live event tickets, facilitated through partnerships with regional distributors. The website supports these operations with e-commerce links and promotional content. The partnership ecosystem includes p(doom) records for merchandise distribution in the US, Australia, and Europe, as well as event partners like Meadow Creek Co. The business model is direct-to-consumer with a focus on fan engagement and multimedia content delivery. Growth indicators include recent releases and active tour dates. The site reflects a small-sized entity with a focused niche in the media industry.

Security posture

The security posture is moderate with HTTPS enforced and domain transfer protection enabled. However, the lack of DNSSEC and security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options reduces the overall security maturity. No privacy or cookie policies are present, which is a compliance risk under GDPR and similar regulations. The site uses multiple tracking technologies, increasing the importance of transparent privacy practices. No vulnerability disclosure or incident response contacts are provided, limiting readiness for security incidents. Overall, the site is secure enough for its purpose but would benefit from enhanced security controls and compliance documentation.

Recommendations

  1. Enable DNSSEC to improve domain security and prevent DNS spoofing.
  2. Implement standard security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security.
  3. Publish comprehensive privacy and cookie policies with clear GDPR compliance statements.
  4. Add a security.txt file or vulnerability disclosure policy to facilitate responsible reporting.
  5. Enhance accessibility features to improve compliance and user experience for all visitors.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
King Gizzard & The Lizard Wizard
Description
Official website for the band King Gizzard & The Lizard Wizard featuring information about shows, releases, videos, and merchandise.
Key services
Music releases, Concert tickets, Merchandise sales, Video content
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Webflow, Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, Facebook Pixel, Klaviyo
Frameworks
Webflow
Platforms
Webflow CMS
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
70/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled
  • Domain status clientTransferProhibited

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, Facebook Pixel, Klaviyo
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Facebook Pixel, Klaviyo
Marketing tools
Klaviyo
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is an official band site with rich media content and e-commerce links.
  2. No explicit privacy or cookie policies found, which is a compliance gap.
  3. Use of multiple tracking and marketing tools indicates moderate user tracking.
  4. No security.txt or vulnerability disclosure found.
  5. No contact emails or phone numbers explicitly listed; contact form present.
  6. Good technical implementation using Webflow and modern analytics.
  7. No WAF or blocking detected; site fully accessible.
  8. No adult or explicit content detected; safe for general audiences.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on the Webflow CMS platform, utilizing modern web fonts and asynchronous loading of analytics and marketing scripts. Hosting is provided via Cloudflare, ensuring good uptime and SSL support. Performance is moderate with optimized images and responsive design. The technical stack includes Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, Facebook Pixel, and Klaviyo for marketing automation. No deprecated or vulnerable libraries were detected. The site lacks some advanced SEO and accessibility features but maintains a clean and professional codebase. Technical risks are low but could be mitigated further by improving security headers and privacy compliance.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with kinggizzardandthelizardwizard.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review kinggizzardandthelizardwizard.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.