Skip to main content

Security report for kimbi.lv

Finance · Latvia

Medium risk. 8 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 1 other check.

Security score

60/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Kimbi.lv is a Latvian financial services website that is currently closed, as indicated by the website content. The site serves primarily as a notice redirecting customers to Vivus.lv for customer service inquiries, suggesting a business consolidation or closure. The website is built on the Webflow platform and hosted on AWS infrastructure, using standard web technologies such as jQuery and Google Fonts. The digital presence is minimal, with no interactive forms or detailed business information available. Security posture is basic with no advanced security headers or policies visible, and privacy compliance is lacking due to absence of privacy or cookie policies. Overall, the site functions as a placeholder with limited content and minimal user engagement features.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
10/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

8 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching kimbi.lv

This scan found 26 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
25
Email security
85
DNS health
70
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
10
Average
60

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The business appears to be a small financial services entity focused on lending or credit services, now inactive or merged with Vivus.lv. The redirection to Vivus.lv indicates a partnership or parent company relationship. The market positioning is currently inactive, with no active services offered on the site. The business model likely involved online lending, targeting Latvian customers. There is no evidence of extensive marketing, analytics, or advertising practices. The partnership ecosystem includes Vivus.lv as a key related domain. Growth indicators are not present due to site closure.

Security posture

Security maturity is low with no visible security headers or incident response contacts. The site uses HTTPS (inferred from standard Webflow hosting), but no explicit security policies or frameworks are disclosed. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the limited content. Compliance with GDPR or other data protection regulations is not demonstrated. Incident response readiness and security culture indicators are absent. The site would benefit from implementing security best practices and transparency in privacy and security policies.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and publish a comprehensive privacy policy and cookie policy to improve GDPR compliance.
  2. Add security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to enhance security posture.
  3. Provide clear contact information for security incidents and data protection officer if applicable.
  4. Enhance website content to improve user experience and trustworthiness or clearly communicate closure status.
  5. Regularly review and update WHOIS and domain registration information to maintain legitimacy and trust.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Description
Kimbi.lv website is closed. Customers are redirected to Vivus.lv customer service for inquiries related to their obligations with Kimbi.lv.
Key services
Financial lending services (inferred from context and redirect to Vivus.lv)
Content quality
basic
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Webflow, Google Fonts, jQuery 3.5.1
Frameworks
Webflow
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
30/100

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
basic
User experience
basic
Content relevance
poor
Navigation
poor
Professionalism
basic
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is closed and serves as a redirect notice to Vivus.lv customer service.
  2. No privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found.
  3. No forms or user input fields present.
  4. Contact information limited to phone and email for Vivus.lv.
  5. No social media links detected.
  6. Website built on Webflow with standard external resources.
  7. No security headers or advanced security features detected.
  8. No analytics or tracking scripts detected beyond jQuery and Webflow scripts.
  9. Minimal content and basic design indicate a placeholder or closure notice page.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built using Webflow CMS and hosted on AWS infrastructure, leveraging jQuery and Google Fonts for frontend functionality and styling. Performance is moderate with basic mobile optimization and accessibility features. SEO optimization is minimal with only basic meta tags present. There is no evidence of advanced analytics or tracking technologies. The technical implementation is straightforward but lacks depth in security and privacy features. Modernization opportunities include adding security headers, improving accessibility, and enhancing content quality to support business objectives.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with kimbi.lv. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review kimbi.lv.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.