Skip to main content

Security report for killergram.com

Aylo Premium Ltd. · Media · N/a

Medium risk. 4 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

69/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

The website www.killergram.com operates as a premium adult entertainment platform under the brand Spicevids, managed by Aylo Premium Ltd. It offers HD adult video streaming with subscription-based access to exclusive content featuring popular performers. The platform is part of a larger network of adult sites, leveraging trusted payment processors and billing services to provide a seamless user experience. The site demonstrates a professional design with clear navigation, age gating, and comprehensive legal disclaimers to ensure compliance with adult content regulations. Technically, the site employs modern web technologies including React, Google reCAPTCHA Enterprise for bot protection, and Flickity for UI components. It integrates Google Analytics for user behavior tracking and uses a proprietary content management system. While performance and mobile optimization are good, some security headers like Content-Security-Policy are disabled, representing a moderate security risk. The site uses HTTPS exclusively, ensuring encrypted communications. From a security perspective, the platform shows maturity with secure session management, cookie consent mechanisms, and trusted third-party services. However, the absence of WHOIS registration data for the domain raises concerns about domain legitimacy and transparency. No critical vulnerabilities or malware indicators were found, but improvements in security header implementation are recommended. Overall, the site presents a moderate risk profile with strong business backing and technical infrastructure but suffers from incomplete domain registration transparency. Strategic recommendations include enabling CSP headers, adding anti-clickjacking headers, and improving WHOIS data visibility to enhance trust and security posture.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
68/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

4 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

  3. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1
    • High

      Weak SSL Key Length

      SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

      What to do: Use at least 2048-bit RSA or 256-bit ECC key

      • CWE-326
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • Mozilla TLS: Mozilla Server Side TLS 6.0 intermediate: rsa_key_size 2048

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching killergram.com

This scan found 24 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
52
Security headers
60
Email security
60
DNS health
75
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
68
Average
69

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The business operates in the adult media sector, focusing on subscription-based video streaming services. It leverages a network of sister sites and partners to maximize market reach and monetization. The company benefits from established payment and billing partnerships, ensuring reliable revenue streams. The target audience is adult consumers seeking high-quality, ad-free adult content. The business model emphasizes premium memberships with daily content updates and community engagement features. The presence of multiple legal and compliance policies indicates a mature operational framework. Growth potential lies in expanding content offerings and enhancing user experience through technology upgrades.

Security posture

The security posture is solid with HTTPS enforcement, secure cookie handling, and integration of Google reCAPTCHA Enterprise to mitigate automated abuse. The site implements cookie consent aligned with GDPR requirements and maintains comprehensive legal policies including DMCA and CSAM compliance. However, the lack of a Content-Security-Policy header and missing X-Frame-Options header expose the site to potential clickjacking and cross-site scripting risks. The absence of WHOIS data for the domain is a notable gap in transparency and trust. Incident response contacts are clearly provided, supporting effective handling of abuse reports. Overall, the site demonstrates good security hygiene but should address header deficiencies and domain registration transparency.

Recommendations

  1. Enable and enforce a strong Content-Security-Policy header to mitigate XSS and data injection attacks.
  2. Add X-Frame-Options or frame-ancestors headers to prevent clickjacking attacks.
  3. Publish complete WHOIS registration data or use a verified privacy protection service to improve domain trustworthiness.
  4. Conduct regular security audits of third-party scripts and dependencies to identify and remediate vulnerabilities.
  5. Enhance accessibility features to improve compliance and user experience for all users.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Aylo Premium Ltd.
Description
Spicevids is the ultimate source for HD full porn videos featuring your favorite pornstars without ads. Enjoy the hottest premium porn vids in 720p, 1080p and 4K online.
Key services
Streaming HD adult videos, Membership subscriptions, Access to premium content, Community interaction with performers
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Google reCAPTCHA Enterprise, Flickity carousel, Probiller payment gateway, Google Analytics
Frameworks
React
Platforms
Web
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
  • Use of HTTPS
  • reCAPTCHA Enterprise integration
  • Cookie consent mechanism
  • Session and auth cookies with appropriate flags

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Ad networks
TrafficJunky
Marketing tools
Google reCAPTCHA Enterprise
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is a premium adult content platform with professional design and comprehensive legal policies.
  2. Content is accessible and not blocked by WAF or security challenges.
  3. WHOIS data is missing, which is unusual and reduces domain trust.
  4. Strong integration with known adult entertainment network and payment processors.
  5. Good privacy and cookie compliance with user consent mechanisms.
  6. Security headers partially implemented; CSP disabled which is a moderate risk.
  7. Use of modern web technologies and analytics tools.
  8. Clear age gating and legal disclaimers present.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a modern React-based front end with integration of various Project1content services for content delivery, navigation, and playback. It uses Google reCAPTCHA Enterprise for bot mitigation and Google Analytics for traffic analysis. The site loads asynchronously with multiple JavaScript bundles and employs Flickity for carousel UI elements. Hosting details are not explicitly found but likely use a CDN and cloud hosting given the asset URLs. Performance is moderate with good mobile responsiveness. The CMS appears proprietary with extensive configuration for content filtering and user session management. Technical debt is low but security header omissions represent a risk area. Opportunities exist to optimize loading times and enhance SEO metadata further.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with killergram.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review killergram.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.