Skip to main content

Security report for keysenergy.com

Keys Energy Services · Energy · United States

Medium risk. 4 critical or high findings in SSL/TLS and GDPR outside view.

Security score

69/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Keys Energy Services is a public power utility serving the Lower Florida Keys, providing electricity to over 28,000 customers from Key West to the Seven-Mile Bridge. Established in 1943, the company operates as a regional utility focused on residential and commercial electricity services, including payment options, rebate programs, and storm preparedness resources. The website reflects a stable market position as a trusted local energy provider with a clear focus on customer service and community engagement. Technically, the website is built on the Webflow platform, leveraging modern web technologies such as Google Tag Manager, Google Analytics, and LiveHelpNow for customer support. The site demonstrates good mobile optimization, accessibility, and SEO practices, although performance is moderate. The technical infrastructure is adequate for the business needs but could benefit from enhanced security headers and explicit cookie consent mechanisms. From a security perspective, the site enforces HTTPS and avoids exposing sensitive data or vulnerable libraries. However, the absence of security headers and lack of published security policies or incident response information indicate room for improvement. The missing WHOIS data for the domain is a notable anomaly that reduces trust slightly but does not directly impact the operational legitimacy of the business. Overall, the website presents a professional and trustworthy front for Keys Energy Services, with solid business credibility and user experience. Strategic recommendations include improving security header implementation, adding cookie consent and privacy compliance features, and clarifying domain registration information to enhance trust and compliance posture.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
53/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

4 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1
    • High

      Weak SSL Key Length

      SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

      What to do: Use at least 2048-bit RSA or 256-bit ECC key

      • CWE-326
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • Mozilla TLS: Mozilla Server Side TLS 6.0 intermediate: rsa_key_size 2048

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching keysenergy.com

This scan found 24 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
49
Security headers
60
Email security
75
DNS health
75
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
53
Average
69

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Keys Energy Services operates as a public utility in the energy sector, targeting residential and commercial customers in the Lower Florida Keys. Its competitive advantage lies in its long-standing presence since 1943 and its role as a community-focused electricity provider. Revenue streams are primarily from electricity sales and related services such as rebates and customer service requests. The company maintains an active social media presence and provides multiple customer resources online, indicating a customer-centric approach. Growth indicators include digital engagement and resource availability. The partnership ecosystem is not explicitly detailed, and no subsidiaries or parent companies are identified. The business model is straightforward, focusing on utility service delivery with an emphasis on reliability and community support.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a moderate security maturity level with HTTPS enforced and no visible sensitive data leaks or vulnerable libraries. However, the lack of security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Content-Type-Options, and X-Frame-Options reduces the overall security posture. There is no evidence of published security policies, incident response plans, or vulnerability disclosure programs, which are important for compliance and transparency. The absence of a cookie consent mechanism also indicates a gap in privacy compliance. While no critical vulnerabilities were detected, these gaps suggest the need for enhanced security governance and communication to improve risk management and user trust.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Content-Type-Options, and X-Frame-Options to mitigate common web attacks.
  2. Add a clear cookie consent banner and privacy management tools to comply with privacy regulations and improve user transparency.
  3. Publish a formal security policy and incident response plan on the website to demonstrate security governance and readiness.
  4. Consider establishing a vulnerability disclosure program or security.txt file to encourage responsible reporting of security issues.
  5. Clarify domain registration information and ensure WHOIS data is accurate and publicly available to enhance domain trustworthiness.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Keys Energy Services
Description
KEYS is the public power utility for the Lower Florida Keys. KEYS provides electricity from Key West to the Seven-Mile Bridge and serves more than 28,000 customers.
Key services
Electricity provision, Residential service, Commercial service, Payment options, Customer service requests, Rebate programs, Storm center information
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Webflow CMS, Google Tag Manager, Google Analytics, LiveHelpNow chat SDK, Google Translate widget, jQuery 3.5.1, ACSB accessibility widget
Frameworks
Webflow
Platforms
Webflow hosting
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
80/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • No visible vulnerable libraries

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with rich content
  2. No WAF or security blocking detected
  3. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerabilities found
  4. WHOIS data missing, which is unusual
  5. Good accessibility and SEO practices observed
  6. No explicit privacy cookie consent mechanism found
  7. Social media presence across major platforms
  8. Clear contact information and physical address provided
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built using Webflow CMS, integrating modern JavaScript libraries and third-party services such as Google Tag Manager and LiveHelpNow chat. The site is mobile optimized and accessible, with good SEO metadata and structured navigation. Performance is moderate, likely due to multiple external scripts and video content. The hosting is via Webflow's CDN, providing reliable uptime and SSL support. Technical debt appears low, but improvements can be made in security header implementation and cookie consent management. The site uses Google Translate for multilingual support, enhancing accessibility for diverse users.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with keysenergy.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review keysenergy.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.