Skip to main content

Security report for kelaspertamina.com

Pertamina (implied by branding and domain) · Energy · Indonesia

Medium risk. 7 critical or high findings in Email security, Security headers and 2 other checks.

Security score

62/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Kelaspertamina.com is an educational and training platform primarily targeting Pertamina employees and affiliates in Indonesia. The website offers categorized e-learning courses tailored to various roles within Pertamina, such as managers, operators, and administrative staff. The platform includes features like class rankings, event calendars, and testimonial sections, indicating a focus on internal corporate training and knowledge sharing. Technically, the site is built on WordPress using popular plugins and page builders, providing a moderate level of performance and mobile responsiveness. Security posture is basic, with HTTPS enabled but lacking advanced security headers and anti-CSRF protections. Privacy and cookie policies are absent, which may affect compliance with data protection regulations. The WHOIS data is unavailable or indicates the domain may not be registered, raising concerns about domain legitimacy despite the professional appearance and Pertamina branding. Overall, the site serves as a specialized corporate training resource but requires improvements in security, privacy compliance, and domain registration transparency.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
53/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

7 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • Critical

      No email authentication configured

      Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

      What to do: Implement SPF, DKIM, and DMARC immediately

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  3. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching kelaspertamina.com

This scan found 25 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
75
Security headers
15
Email security
60
DNS health
70
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
53
Average
62

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The platform positions itself as an internal training hub for Pertamina, a major Indonesian energy company. Its business model revolves around providing structured e-learning content and operational procedures to enhance employee skills and compliance. The presence of multiple course categories aligned with Pertamina job functions suggests a targeted approach to workforce development. The lack of public contact information and privacy policies indicates a possible internal or restricted audience focus. The site leverages WordPress and associated plugins to deliver content efficiently but lacks advanced marketing or analytics tools, implying limited external commercial intent. The absence of WHOIS data and domain registration details is a notable gap that could impact trust and credibility if not addressed.

Security posture

Security measures on the website are minimal. While HTTPS is used, no security headers such as Content-Security-Policy or HSTS are detected, and the login form lacks visible anti-CSRF tokens. No evidence of vulnerability scanning or incident response mechanisms is found. The absence of privacy and cookie policies further weakens the site's compliance posture. These factors suggest a basic security maturity level appropriate for an internal training site but insufficient for broader public-facing platforms. Recommendations include implementing security headers, enhancing form protections, and publishing privacy and cookie policies to improve trust and regulatory compliance.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive security headers including CSP, HSTS, X-Frame-Options, and X-XSS-Protection.
  2. Add anti-CSRF tokens to all forms, especially login forms, to prevent cross-site request forgery attacks.
  3. Publish clear privacy and cookie policies to comply with data protection regulations and inform users.
  4. Verify and update domain WHOIS registration to ensure transparency and legitimacy.
  5. Conduct regular security audits and update WordPress core and plugins to latest versions.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Pertamina (implied by branding and domain)
Description
Kelaspertamina.com is an educational platform associated with Pertamina, offering various training courses and learning materials targeted at different roles such as Manager, Operator, Pengawas, Administrasi, NFR Officer, and Pertashop personnel. It provides e-learning content, operational procedures, and class rankings.
Key services
E-learning courses, Training materials, Class rankings, Event calendar, Class bulletin board (Mading Kelas)
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress 5.5.1, PHP, jQuery, Elementor, Modern Events Calendar Lite, Paid Memberships Pro, BuddyPress, bbPress, MyCred, Header Footer Elementor, TranslatePress Multilingual
Frameworks
WordPress CMS, Elementor page builder
Platforms
WordPress
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
50/100
Good practices seen
  • Use of HTTPS (implied by canonical link https://www.kelaspertamina.com)
  • Login form with password field and remember me checkbox

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is a WordPress-based e-learning platform for Pertamina staff
  2. No WHOIS data available, domain registration status unclear
  3. No privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found on homepage
  4. No explicit contact emails or phone numbers found in content
  5. No security headers detected, login form present but no advanced security tokens visible
  6. No analytics or tracking scripts detected in provided HTML
  7. Website content is in Indonesian language
  8. Site uses multiple WordPress plugins for events, memberships, and social features
  9. Site is accessible without WAF or blocking mechanisms
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress 5.5.1 with a variety of plugins for membership, events, social features, and page building (Elementor). It uses jQuery and other common JavaScript libraries. The site is moderately optimized for mobile devices and has a structured layout with image carousels and categorized course listings. Performance appears moderate with no major errors detected in the HTML. SEO optimization is basic with canonical tags and meta viewport settings present. Accessibility features are minimal but present. Hosting provider details are not discernible from the provided data. Overall, the technical implementation is standard for a WordPress-based corporate training site but could benefit from modernization and enhanced security configurations.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with kelaspertamina.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review kelaspertamina.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.