Skip to main content

Security report for kbo.lv

SIA KBO · Real Estate · Latvia

Medium risk. 8 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 1 other check.

Security score

51/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

SIA KBO is a Latvian real estate developer established in 2014, representing Finnish corporation Insinōōritaimisto Bertel Ekengren Oy's property projects in Latvia. The company focuses on developing sustainable and functional residential apartment buildings primarily in Riga and its surroundings. Their portfolio includes projects like “Imantas Ozoli” and others, targeting buyers seeking modern, energy-efficient homes with good infrastructure. The website reflects a professional digital presence with clear contact information, social media integration, and GDPR-compliant cookie consent mechanisms. Technically, the site uses modern JavaScript libraries and APIs such as jQuery, Bing Maps, and Google Analytics, ensuring a moderate performance and good mobile responsiveness. Security posture is adequate with HTTPS and client-side validation but lacks advanced HTTP security headers and incident response disclosures. Overall, the business appears legitimate and well-positioned in the local real estate market, though improvements in security policies and transparency are recommended.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
25/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

8 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching kbo.lv

This scan found 24 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
20
Email security
65
DNS health
85
Network security
40
GDPR outside view
25
Average
51

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

KBO operates in the Latvian real estate sector with a niche focus on residential apartment developments. Their competitive advantage lies in their Finnish parent company backing and focus on sustainable, functional housing. Revenue streams likely come from property sales and land acquisitions. The target customers are local residents, families, and professionals in Riga. The company maintains partnerships with project-specific domains and leverages social media for marketing. Growth indicators include ongoing and planned projects. The business model is straightforward property development and sales, with a clear emphasis on quality and sustainability. Strategic observations suggest potential for expansion but also a need for enhanced digital security and compliance maturity.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a basic to moderate security maturity level. HTTPS is enforced, and cookie consent is implemented, indicating GDPR awareness. However, the absence of HTTP security headers such as Content Security Policy, HSTS, and X-Frame-Options reduces protection against common web attacks. No public incident response or vulnerability disclosure mechanisms are present, which limits transparency and responsiveness to security issues. Form validation is present but could be improved with stronger server-side controls. Overall, the security posture is adequate for a small business but requires enhancements to meet higher compliance and security standards.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive HTTP security headers including CSP, HSTS, X-Frame-Options, and X-XSS-Protection.
  2. Publish a security.txt file and incident response contact information to improve vulnerability disclosure and trust.
  3. Enhance server-side validation and sanitization of all form inputs to prevent injection and data integrity issues.
  4. Regularly audit third-party libraries and update to mitigate vulnerabilities.
  5. Increase transparency around data protection practices and provide clearer privacy and security policies.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
SIA KBO
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
SIA KBO
Description
Nekustamo īpašumu attīstītājs KBO darbojas Latvijā kopš 2014. gada, pārstāvot Somijas korporācijas Insinōōritaimisto Bertel Ekengren Oy nekustamā īpašuma projektus Latvijā. Pirmais projekts ir ekonomiskās klases daudzdzīvokļu nami “Imantas Ozoli” Rīgā. Uzņēmums plāno attīstīt vairākus projektus Imantā un citviet Rīgā, fokusējoties uz ilgtspējīgiem un funkcionāliem nekustamajiem īpašumiem ar augstvērtīgiem būvniecības materiāliem un labu infrastruktūru.
Key services
daudzdzīvokļu māju attīstīšana, zemes pirkšana attīstības projektiem
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
jQuery 3.5.1, Google Analytics (gtag.js), Bing Maps API, Tippy.js, Popper.js, CookieConsent2
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
65/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent implemented
  • Form validation on client side

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Ad networks
Google Ads (AW-362455289)
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges.
  2. WHOIS data unavailable due to query limit error; no registrar or domain age info extracted.
  3. Website uses HTTPS and modern JavaScript libraries.
  4. Cookie consent banner present and functional, indicating GDPR compliance.
  5. Contact information is complete with physical address, phone, email, and contact forms.
  6. No explicit privacy or security policies beyond cookie and privacy policy pages.
  7. No visible security.txt or incident response contacts.
  8. Social media presence on Facebook and Instagram.
  9. Multiple real estate projects linked externally as partner sites.
  10. Forms collect personal data including name, phone, email, address, and comments.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a modern JavaScript stack including jQuery 3.5.1, Google Analytics, Bing Maps API, Tippy.js, and Popper.js. It is mobile responsive with good design quality and user experience. Performance is moderate, with room for optimization. No CMS is detected, suggesting a custom or static site. Hosting provider details are not available. SEO is basic with meta viewport and charset tags but lacks advanced structured data or Open Graph tags. Accessibility is basic, with some ARIA or semantic improvements possible. Overall, the technical infrastructure supports the business needs but could benefit from modernization and enhanced security configurations.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with kbo.lv. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review kbo.lv.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.