Skip to main content

Security report for kavehshakib.com

Harley Street Maxillofacial Clinic · Healthcare · United Kingdom

Medium risk. 4 critical or high findings in Security headers, SSL/TLS and 1 other check.

Security score

60/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Harley Street Maxillofacial Clinic is a specialized healthcare provider in the UK focusing on maxillofacial surgery and related treatments. The website highlights its expert consultants, including Professor Kaveh Shakib, and offers detailed information about services such as facial surgery and corrective jaw treatment. The clinic is part of the Akessa Group, indicating a reputable market position within healthcare. The digital infrastructure is built on WordPress with modern plugins for forms and anti-spam, complemented by Google Tag Manager and Plausible Analytics for tracking and marketing. The site is well-optimized for mobile and accessibility, providing a professional user experience. Security posture is good with HTTPS and anti-spam measures, though some improvements like enabling DNSSEC and adding security policies are recommended. Privacy compliance is partially met with a cookie consent mechanism but lacks explicit privacy and terms of service pages. Overall, the website is trustworthy and professional, serving its target audience effectively.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
83/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

4 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

  3. Network security

    Services reachable from the internet are the first thing attackers probe. Anything open that does not need to be should be closed.

    • High

      High-Risk Service Exposed: FTP

      Port 21 (FTP) is publicly accessible - FTP - Often unencrypted file transfer

      What to do: Consider restricting access to FTP or implementing strong authentication

      • NIS2 21(2)(e)
      • IR 2024/2690 6.7.2(f): Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690, Annex point 6.7.2(f): Network security
      • NIST CM-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 CM-7: Least Functionality
      • NIST SC-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 SC-7: Boundary Protection

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching kavehshakib.com

This scan found 22 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
57
Security headers
50
Email security
70
DNS health
80
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
83
Average
60

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The clinic operates in the healthcare sector, targeting patients requiring maxillofacial surgery and dental support. Its business model is service-oriented, leveraging expert consultants to deliver specialized treatments. The association with Akessa Group and multiple hospital partners strengthens its market presence. Revenue streams likely include patient treatments and consultations. The website supports growth through clear branding, professional content, and digital marketing tools. Partnerships with hospitals and use of external domains for services indicate a collaborative ecosystem. The business shows maturity with a domain age of over 10 years and consistent branding.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a moderate to good security maturity level. HTTPS is enforced, and anti-spam protection via CleanTalk is active, reducing spam risks. Cookie consent is implemented with detailed categories, supporting GDPR compliance. However, the absence of DNSSEC, security headers, and published security policies or incident response contacts indicates gaps. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the provided content. The site would benefit from enhanced security headers, a vulnerability disclosure policy, and incident response information to improve trust and readiness.

Recommendations

  1. Enable DNSSEC on the domain to enhance DNS security and prevent spoofing.
  2. Publish a comprehensive privacy policy and terms of service pages to improve compliance and user trust.
  3. Implement security headers such as Content Security Policy (CSP), HSTS, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options.
  4. Add a security policy or security.txt file with incident response contact details to facilitate vulnerability reporting.
  5. Regularly audit and update third-party plugins and scripts to mitigate potential vulnerabilities.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Harley Street Maxillofacial Clinic
Description
Our consultants offer facial surgery, corrective jaw treatment and expert care for any issue affecting the mouth, face, or neck, including specialist dental support.
Key services
Facial surgery, Corrective jaw treatment, Specialist dental support
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, Gravity Forms, CleanTalk Anti-Spam, Google Tag Manager, Plausible Analytics
Platforms
WordPress
Performance
moderate
Mobile
excellent
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Anti-spam protection via CleanTalk
  • Cookie consent banner with detailed categories

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics (via GTM), Plausible Analytics
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Plausible Analytics
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is a professional healthcare clinic site with detailed consultant profiles
  2. Uses WordPress CMS with modern plugins and anti-spam measures
  3. Cookie consent is implemented with detailed categories and user controls
  4. No explicit contact emails or phone numbers found in the provided HTML snippet
  5. No visible security.txt or vulnerability disclosure policy
  6. No privacy policy or terms of service pages detected in the provided content
  7. Good SEO and accessibility practices observed
  8. No WAF or blocking detected, site content fully accessible
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress CMS with a modern tech stack including Gravity Forms for multi-column forms, CleanTalk for anti-spam, Google Tag Manager for marketing, and Plausible Analytics for privacy-focused analytics. The site uses optimized fonts, responsive design, and accessibility best practices. Hosting and DNS are managed via Wild West Domains and domaincontrol.com respectively. Performance is moderate with preloading of fonts and images. The site lacks DNSSEC and some security headers, which are technical risks. Overall, the infrastructure is stable and modern but could benefit from enhanced security configurations and formal policies.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with kavehshakib.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review kavehshakib.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.