Skip to main content

Security report for karyntia.pl

Hospitality · Poland

Medium risk. 5 critical or high findings in Security headers, SSL/TLS and 1 other check.

Security score

58/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

The website www.karyntia.pl serves as a regional tourism information portal focused on the Carinthia region of Austria, targeting Polish-speaking tourists. It provides comprehensive travel-related content including accommodation, activities, and local attractions. The site is built on TYPO3 CMS and employs a modern technology stack including jQuery, Foundation, and various UI libraries, indicating a moderate level of digital maturity. Security-wise, the site enforces HTTPS and implements a detailed cookie consent mechanism compliant with GDPR, though it lacks visible security headers and explicit incident response policies. The absence of WHOIS data for the domain introduces some uncertainty regarding domain legitimacy, but the website content and technical setup appear professional and trustworthy. Overall, the site is functional and well-structured but would benefit from enhanced transparency in business and security information.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
100/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

5 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

  3. DNS health

    DNS sends visitors and email to the right servers. Misconfigured records can cause outages or let someone redirect your traffic.

    • High

      Weak SPF Policy

      SPF record has permissive policy allowing any server to send email

      What to do: Use -all or ~all qualifier for better email security

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching karyntia.pl

This scan found 23 issues across 5 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
62
Security headers
15
Email security
70
DNS health
60
Network security
40
GDPR outside view
100
Average
58

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention karyntia.pl, from OffSeq Breach.

No leaked records found

Breach holds no records for karyntia.pl right now. New leaks arrive continuously, so monitoring on Breach alerts you if that changes.

Monitor on Breach (opens in a new tab)

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The site positions itself as a niche tourism portal promoting Carinthia, Austria, to Polish tourists. Its business model revolves around providing travel information and possibly generating revenue through advertising and partnerships with accommodation providers. The presence of multiple external partner domains suggests a collaborative ecosystem. However, the lack of explicit company contact details and business registration information limits the ability to fully assess business credibility. The extensive use of third-party ad networks and tracking services indicates reliance on advertising revenue streams. Growth potential exists in expanding contact transparency and formalizing business credentials.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a good baseline security posture with HTTPS and GDPR-compliant cookie consent. However, it lacks visible HTTP security headers such as Content Security Policy and HSTS, which are recommended best practices. No security.txt or vulnerability disclosure information is present, and no incident response contacts are published. The extensive use of third-party tracking and advertising services increases the attack surface and privacy risks. The missing WHOIS data is a concern for domain trustworthiness. Overall, the site is secure for general use but could improve in transparency and advanced security controls.

Recommendations

  1. Implement standard HTTP security headers (CSP, HSTS, X-Frame-Options, X-XSS-Protection) to enhance protection against common web attacks.
  2. Publish a security.txt file and incident response policy to improve transparency and readiness for security incidents.
  3. Add clear company contact information including emails and phone numbers to increase business credibility and user trust.
  4. Verify and update WHOIS domain registration information to ensure domain legitimacy and reduce suspicion.
  5. Review and minimize third-party tracking scripts to enhance user privacy and reduce potential vulnerabilities.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Description
Karyntia Austria to wymarzone miejsce na urlop i latem i zimą ✓ Setki tras i szlaków ✓ Nieskazitelne jeziora ✓ Hotele, kempingi, spa ► Dowiedz się więcej!
Key services
Tourism information, Accommodation listings, Travel guides, Event information
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
jQuery, Foundation 6.3.0, Font Awesome 4.7.0, Owl Carousel 2.3.4, jQuery UI 1.12.1, Tooltipster, Select2 4.0.5, Shariff 3.2.1, Matomo Tag Manager, Cookiebot
Frameworks
TYPO3 CMS
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent with granular controls
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
Matomo, Google Analytics
Tracking level
extensive
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Ad networks
Meta Platforms, Inc., Adform, Google DoubleClick, The Trade Desk
Tracking pixels
Matomo, Pinterest, Outbrain, Tawk.to
Marketing tools
Cookiebot, Shariff
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website uses TYPO3 CMS with modern frontend libraries
  2. Comprehensive cookie consent mechanism with detailed cookie categories
  3. No visible contact emails or phone numbers on main page
  4. Privacy policy is present and linked
  5. No terms of service page detected
  6. No explicit security or incident response policies published
  7. Extensive use of third-party tracking and advertising services
  8. No WAF or blocking mechanisms detected
  9. WHOIS data unavailable, which is unusual and may warrant caution
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses TYPO3 CMS with a combination of modern frontend libraries such as Foundation, jQuery UI, Owl Carousel, and Font Awesome, indicating a well-maintained technical stack. The site loads asynchronously loaded analytics and consent management scripts, including Matomo and Cookiebot, supporting privacy compliance. Performance is moderate with no evident blocking scripts. Mobile optimization is good, supported by responsive meta tags and CSS frameworks. Accessibility is basic but present. SEO is supported by proper meta tags and Open Graph data. Hosting provider details are not explicitly found. Overall, the technical infrastructure is solid but could benefit from enhanced security headers and performance optimizations.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with karyntia.pl. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review karyntia.pl.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.