Skip to main content

Security report for kanteskrogs.lv

Kantes Krogs · Hospitality · Latvia

Medium risk. 5 critical or high findings in Email security, Security headers and 2 other checks.

Security score

71/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Kantes Krogs is a small hospitality business operating as a restaurant located in Gulbene, Latvia. The company offers dine-in, takeaway, and delivery services with a focus on quality food and a welcoming atmosphere. Their menu includes a variety of dishes, and they also host events featuring live and disco music, catering to families and friends. The website reflects a local business with a clear market position and strong community engagement through social media platforms such as TripAdvisor, Instagram, Facebook, and Google. Technically, the website is built using modern web technologies including Next.js and React, with integration of Google Fonts and Google Maps API. The site is mobile optimized and demonstrates good SEO practices. Performance is moderate, and accessibility is basic but functional. The site uses HTTPS with appropriate security headers, indicating a good security posture. Privacy and cookie policies are present with consent mechanisms, showing compliance with GDPR requirements. Security-wise, the website has a solid foundation with HTTPS and security headers, but lacks explicit security policy and incident response information. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the content. The absence of WHOIS data due to query limits limits full domain trust analysis, but the website content and contact information appear legitimate and consistent with the business claims. Overall, Kantes Krogs presents a trustworthy and professional online presence for a local restaurant business. Strategic recommendations include adding a dedicated security policy page, incident response contacts, and continuous monitoring of third-party scripts to enhance security and compliance further.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
68/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

5 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • Critical

      No email authentication configured

      Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

      What to do: Implement SPF, DKIM, and DMARC immediately

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…
  3. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  4. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching kanteskrogs.lv

This scan found 22 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
50
Email security
60
DNS health
75
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
68
Average
71

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention kanteskrogs.lv, from OffSeq Breach.

No leaked records found

Breach holds no records for kanteskrogs.lv right now. New leaks arrive continuously, so monitoring on Breach alerts you if that changes.

Monitor on Breach (opens in a new tab)

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Kantes Krogs operates as a local restaurant in Gulbene, Latvia, offering dine-in, takeaway, and delivery services. The business targets local residents and visitors seeking quality meals and social experiences, including events with live and disco music. The company leverages digital tools such as an online menu, social media, and review platforms to engage customers and build reputation. The business model is focused on hospitality and food services with a small-scale operation. There is no indication of parent or subsidiary companies. The website content and marketing tools suggest a growing digital presence and customer-centric approach.

Security posture

The website employs HTTPS with strong security headers, indicating good baseline security practices. Privacy and cookie policies with consent mechanisms demonstrate compliance with GDPR. However, the lack of explicit security policy and incident response information is a gap in transparency and preparedness. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were found in the content. The use of third-party scripts is limited to trusted sources. Overall, the security posture is good for a small hospitality business but can be improved with additional policy disclosures and incident response readiness.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a comprehensive security policy and incident response information.
  2. Maintain regular security audits of third-party scripts and dependencies.
  3. Enhance accessibility and SEO with structured data and ARIA attributes.
  4. Improve website performance through asset optimization and caching.
  5. Strengthen privacy compliance with clear data retention and user rights information.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Kantes Krogs
Description
Maltīte uz vietas, līdzņemšanai, vai ar piegādi. Lielisks ēdiens sākas no lieliskām sastāvdaļām. Kantes krogā, piedāvājam kvalitatīvu maltīti, ko ieturēt visas dienas garumā.
Key services
Dine-in restaurant, Takeaway food, Food delivery, Event hosting with live and disco music
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
React (Next.js), Google Fonts (Poppins), Google Maps API, ChoiceQR platform
Frameworks
Next.js
Platforms
Web
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Security headers present
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges.
  2. Content is focused on a local restaurant in Latvia with detailed menu and contact info.
  3. Privacy and cookie policies are present and include consent mechanisms.
  4. No security policy or incident response information found.
  5. WHOIS data is unavailable due to query limits; no suspicious indicators found in website content.
  6. Good use of modern web technologies and SEO best practices.
  7. Social media presence is strong and consistent with business identity.
Technical notes

Notes

The site uses Next.js and React, with assets served from a CDN. It integrates Google Fonts and Google Maps API. Performance is moderate with deferred scripts and preloading. Mobile optimization is good, but accessibility is basic. SEO is well implemented with meta tags and Open Graph. No explicit CMS detected; likely a custom platform. Hosting provider is not identified. Technical infrastructure is modern and functional with room for optimization.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with kanteskrogs.lv. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review kanteskrogs.lv.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.