Skip to main content

Security report for kamuahelsinki.fi

Kamua Helsinki · Media · Finland

Medium risk. 5 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view.

Security score

73/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Kamua Helsinki is a Finnish marketing and communications agency operating under the parent company Keskisuomalainen Oyj. The company leverages data, technology, and creative thinking to deliver strategic marketing solutions, combining human insight with modern tools. Their website reflects a professional and modern digital presence, optimized for SEO and user experience, targeting Finnish businesses and organizations. Technically, the site is built on WordPress with a modern tech stack including Tailwind CSS, Google Tag Manager, and Microsoft Clarity for analytics. Security posture is solid with HTTPS enforced and cookie consent implemented, though some security headers could be improved. The domain registration is transparent and consistent with the business identity, enhancing trustworthiness.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
10/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

5 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

    • High

      Third-party services without privacy policy

      Detected services: Google Analytics, Facebook, LinkedIn

      What to do: Document all third-party data sharing in your privacy policy

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching kamuahelsinki.fi

This scan found 17 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
85
Security headers
80
Email security
85
DNS health
80
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
10
Average
73

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company positions itself as a medium-sized marketing agency with a strong regional footprint in Finland, offering a broad range of services from strategic planning to digital marketing and media solutions. Their client references include notable Finnish companies, indicating a reputable market position. The business model is service-oriented, focusing on delivering tailored marketing and communication strategies. The parent company Keskisuomalainen Oyj adds credibility and stability. Growth indicators include active content updates and multiple contact channels. The partnership ecosystem includes links to the parent company and social media platforms, supporting a comprehensive marketing approach.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a mature security posture with mandatory HTTPS, use of CAPTCHA in forms, and a cookie consent mechanism compliant with GDPR. However, explicit security headers like Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options are not evident, representing an area for improvement. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were detected in the provided content. The forms include consent checkboxes ensuring user data protection compliance. Incident response and security policy information are not publicly available, which is common for this business type but could be enhanced for transparency. Overall, the security maturity is good but can be strengthened with additional headers and documented policies.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to enhance protection against common web attacks.
  2. Regularly audit and update all WordPress plugins and themes to mitigate vulnerabilities.
  3. Publish a clear security policy and incident response plan accessible to users to improve transparency and trust.
  4. Enhance accessibility features to improve compliance and user experience for all visitors.
  5. Consider adding a dedicated vulnerability disclosure or security.txt file to facilitate responsible reporting.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
Keskisuomalainen Oyj
Registration number
0174445-8
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Kamua Helsinki
Description
Kamua Helsinki is a Finnish marketing and communications agency using data, technology, and thoughtful creativity to solve marketing communication challenges. They combine modern tools with a human-centric approach.
Key services
Strategic planning, Brand design, Marketing communications, Digital marketing, Communications, Websites, Productions, Media solutions
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress 6.7.4, Yoast SEO plugin, Ninja Forms, Rate My Post plugin, Hurrytimer plugin, jQuery, Tailwind CSS, Google Tag Manager, Microsoft Clarity, Gravito Light CMP (Cookie Consent)
Frameworks
WordPress
Platforms
Web
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
80/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Use of CAPTCHA in forms
  • Cookie consent mechanism implemented

Analytics and tracking

Services
Microsoft Clarity, Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Microsoft Clarity
Marketing tools
Leadoo Bot, Rate My Post
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is a professional marketing and communications agency site.
  2. Content is in Finnish with good localization and SEO.
  3. Multiple contact forms with GDPR-compliant consent checkboxes.
  4. Cookie consent implemented with a modern CMP.
  5. No signs of malicious or suspicious content.
  6. WHOIS data is transparent and consistent with business identity.
  7. Use of modern web technologies and analytics tools.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress 6.7.4 with a modern front-end stack including Tailwind CSS and jQuery. It uses popular plugins for SEO (Yoast), forms (Ninja Forms), and user interaction (Rate My Post). Analytics are handled via Microsoft Clarity and Google Tag Manager, indicating a data-driven approach. The site is mobile-optimized and uses lazy loading for images to improve performance. Hosting details are not explicit but the site uses Planeetta Internet Oy as registrar and nameservers. Performance is moderate with good SEO practices and structured data implemented via JSON-LD. Technical risks are minimal but maintaining plugin updates and security headers is recommended to reduce attack surface.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with kamuahelsinki.fi. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review kamuahelsinki.fi.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.