Skip to main content

Security report for kamino.finance

Kamino Finance · Finance · N/a

Low risk. 2 critical or high findings in Security headers and GDPR outside view.

Security score

85/100

Risk levelLow

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Kamino Finance operates as a decentralized finance (DeFi) platform on the Solana blockchain, offering integrated services such as borrowing, lending, market making, and leverage. The platform targets cryptocurrency investors and DeFi users seeking yield opportunities on Solana assets including SOL, USDC, and others. Kamino positions itself as a niche player with a comprehensive product suite and transparent analytics, supported by a professional web presence and active social media channels. Technically, the website is built using modern web technologies including React and integrates with Solana wallets like Phantom. It employs standard analytics tools such as Google Analytics, Hotjar, and Mixpanel, and uses Enzuzo for cookie consent management. The site is mobile-optimized with good SEO and accessibility basics, though some security headers could be enhanced. Security posture is solid with HTTPS enforced and a Content Security Policy in place, but additional headers and tighter CSP rules are recommended. Privacy compliance is well addressed with clear privacy and cookie policies and user consent mechanisms. However, the absence of public WHOIS data due to privacy protection is typical in crypto domains but limits full trust verification. Overall, Kamino Finance presents a professional, secure, and privacy-conscious DeFi platform with moderate risk primarily due to limited WHOIS transparency. Strategic improvements in security headers and enhanced public business contact information would further strengthen trust and compliance.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
68/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

2 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching kamino.finance

This scan found 14 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
100
Security headers
70
Email security
85
DNS health
85
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
68
Average
85

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Kamino Finance operates in the competitive DeFi sector focused on the Solana ecosystem, leveraging the growing demand for decentralized lending, borrowing, and yield products. Its integrated product model combining lending, liquidity provision, and leverage offers competitive advantages by simplifying user experience and maximizing asset utility. Revenue streams likely include fees from lending and borrowing, market making, and leveraged positions. The platform targets crypto-savvy investors and traders, with growth potential tied to Solana's adoption and DeFi market expansion. Partnerships with risk dashboard and documentation sites enhance transparency and user trust. The active presence on major social platforms supports community engagement and marketing efforts.

Security posture

Kamino Finance demonstrates a mature security posture with HTTPS enforced and a Content Security Policy implemented, though the CSP is permissive (frame-ancestors *). The site uses cookie consent management compliant with GDPR, and analytics tools are disclosed. No critical vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the HTML content. However, security headers like X-Frame-Options, X-XSS-Protection, and Strict-Transport-Security are absent and should be added to mitigate common web attacks. The lack of public incident response or security policy pages limits transparency in security governance. Overall, the platform shows good security hygiene but can improve header configurations and incident response visibility.

Recommendations

  1. Enhance Content-Security-Policy to restrict frame-ancestors to trusted domains only to prevent clickjacking.
  2. Add additional security headers such as X-Frame-Options, X-XSS-Protection, and Strict-Transport-Security for improved protection.
  3. Publish a dedicated security policy and incident response page to increase transparency and user trust.
  4. Provide clear company contact information including support emails and phone numbers to improve business credibility.
  5. Regularly audit third-party scripts and analytics tools to ensure no vulnerabilities or privacy issues.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Kamino Finance
Description
Kamino is a Solana DeFi protocol that unifies Lending, Liquidity, and Leverage into a single, secure DeFi product suite. Users can borrow and lend crypto assets, leverage SOL staking yield, provide leveraged liquidity to DEXs, and earn automated market making yields. Supports assets including SOL, USDC, USDT, JUP, JLP, JitoSOL and more.
Key services
Borrowing, Lending, Market Making, Leverage, Yield earning on Solana assets
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
React, JavaScript, CSS, Enzuzo cookie consent, Phantom Wallet integration, Google Analytics, Hotjar, Mixpanel
Frameworks
React
Platforms
Solana blockchain
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Content Security Policy present
  • Cookie consent mechanism implemented

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Hotjar, Mixpanel
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Hotjar, Mixpanel
Marketing tools
Enzuzo cookie consent
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenge.
  2. WHOIS data is unavailable, indicating privacy protection or query failure.
  3. Comprehensive privacy and cookie policies are present with consent mechanisms.
  4. No direct company contact emails or phone numbers found on the site.
  5. Social media presence is strong with official Twitter, Discord, Telegram, and GitHub links.
  6. Security headers are minimal but HTTPS and CSP are implemented.
  7. No signs of adult or explicit content; content is finance and crypto focused.
  8. Use of modern frontend technologies and integration with Solana blockchain wallets.
  9. Cookie consent managed by Enzuzo with detailed user preferences.
  10. Links to risk dashboard and documentation indicate transparency efforts.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a modern React framework with modular JavaScript and CSS assets, indicating a contemporary frontend architecture. It integrates with Solana blockchain wallets such as Phantom and uses third-party services like Enzuzo for cookie consent and multiple analytics platforms (Google Analytics, Hotjar, Mixpanel). The site is mobile responsive and optimized for SEO with appropriate meta tags and Open Graph data. Performance is moderate with no evident blocking or errors. However, hosting provider details are not disclosed, and some security headers are missing. The technical stack aligns well with DeFi platform requirements but could benefit from enhanced security configurations and performance tuning.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Earlier scans of this domain

  1. 75/100Medium28 findingsView report
Reviews of this site

Share your experience with kamino.finance. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review kamino.finance.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.