Skip to main content

Security report for kalkulatorsladuweglowego.pl

Carbon Footprint Foundation · Energy · Poland

Medium risk. 9 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 1 other check.

Security score

57/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

The website kalkulatorsladuweglowego.pl is an online carbon footprint calculator developed by the Carbon Footprint Foundation, targeting Polish-speaking users interested in understanding and reducing their environmental impact. The platform provides an educational tool to calculate carbon footprints from daily activities and encourages environmental awareness. The site is professionally designed with consistent branding and offers language options for Polish and English users. It integrates social sharing features via the Facebook SDK to enhance user engagement. From a technical perspective, the website uses standard web technologies including HTML5, CSS3, and JavaScript, with no detected CMS or complex frameworks. The site is mobile-optimized and includes essential SEO metadata such as Open Graph tags. Performance is moderate, and accessibility features are basic but present. The domain is secured with HTTPS, though no advanced security headers were detected. Cookie consent is implemented, linking to a privacy policy hosted on a related foundation domain. Security posture is adequate but could be improved by enabling DNSSEC, adding security headers, and publishing a security policy or vulnerability disclosure. No critical vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were found. The WHOIS data indicates a legitimate domain registration consistent with the website's purpose and geographic focus. No contact emails or phone numbers are provided, which limits direct communication channels. Overall, the website presents a trustworthy and functional tool for environmental awareness with room for security and compliance enhancements. Strategic recommendations include improving security headers, publishing incident response information, and enhancing accessibility to strengthen user trust and regulatory compliance.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
10/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

9 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching kalkulatorsladuweglowego.pl

This scan found 25 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
75
Security headers
15
Email security
60
DNS health
80
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
10
Average
57

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The Carbon Footprint Foundation operates kalkulatorsladuweglowego.pl as a niche environmental awareness platform focused on carbon footprint calculation. The foundation targets environmentally conscious individuals in Poland and potentially English-speaking users. The business model is non-profit and educational, relying on foundation support and user engagement rather than commercial revenue streams. The website's market position is specialized, serving a growing demand for sustainability tools. Partnerships appear limited to foundation-related domains, with no evident commercial subsidiaries or parent companies. The platform's growth potential lies in expanding language support, integrating more comprehensive environmental data, and enhancing user interaction features.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a moderate security maturity level with HTTPS enabled and a cookie consent mechanism in place. However, it lacks advanced security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and Strict-Transport-Security, which are recommended to mitigate common web threats. No vulnerability disclosure or incident response contacts are published, which could hinder timely security issue reporting. The absence of DNSSEC reduces DNS security. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were detected, indicating a low immediate risk. Compliance with GDPR is partially evidenced by the privacy policy and cookie banner, but further documentation and transparency would improve the security culture and regulatory adherence.

Recommendations

  1. Enable DNSSEC on the domain to enhance DNS security and prevent spoofing.
  2. Implement security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security to strengthen web security posture.
  3. Publish a dedicated security policy and incident response contact information to facilitate vulnerability reporting and improve transparency.
  4. Enhance accessibility features to comply with standards and improve user experience for all visitors.
  5. Consider adding terms of service and more detailed privacy compliance documentation to build user trust and meet regulatory requirements.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Carbon Footprint Foundation
Description
A web-based carbon footprint calculator created by the Carbon Footprint Foundation team to help users calculate and minimize their environmental impact from daily activities.
Key services
Carbon footprint calculation, Environmental impact awareness, Support for foundation activities
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
HTML5, CSS3, JavaScript, Facebook SDK
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
70/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled
  • Cookie consent mechanism

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Facebook Pixel (implied by Facebook SDK usage)
Marketing tools
Facebook SDK
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF detected.
  2. Content is focused on environmental impact and carbon footprint calculation.
  3. No direct contact emails or phone numbers found on the site.
  4. Cookie consent banner present with link to privacy policy.
  5. No terms of service or security policy pages found.
  6. Facebook SDK used for social sharing and possible tracking.
  7. No explicit security headers detected in provided data.
  8. No vulnerability disclosure or incident response information available.
  9. WHOIS data shows domain registered with a known registrar and no privacy protection.
  10. Website is in Polish with option to switch to English language.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built using standard web technologies without reliance on a CMS, which reduces attack surface but may limit scalability. The inclusion of Facebook SDK enables social sharing but introduces third-party tracking considerations. Performance is moderate with room for optimization, especially in loading external scripts. SEO is supported by proper meta tags and Open Graph data. Mobile optimization is good, ensuring usability across devices. The lack of explicit hosting provider information limits infrastructure assessment. Technical debt appears low, but security enhancements and accessibility improvements are recommended to future-proof the platform.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with kalkulatorsladuweglowego.pl. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review kalkulatorsladuweglowego.pl.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.