Skip to main content

Security report for kairi.lv

SIA Kairi · Hospitality · Latvia

High risk. 10 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 2 other checks.

Security score

46/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

SIA Kairi operates a café and confectionery business located in Āgenskalns, Riga, Latvia. The company specializes in baking and selling cakes, tortes, sweets, and savory snacks, catering to events such as weddings, birthdays, corporate gatherings, and children's parties. Their business model focuses on local retail and event catering with both dine-in and takeaway options. The website presents a professional and consistent brand image with clear contact details and customer testimonials, positioning the company as a trusted local hospitality provider. Technically, the website is built using modern web technologies including Next.js and React, indicating a contemporary digital infrastructure. The site is mobile-optimized with good SEO practices and clear navigation, although accessibility features are basic. Performance is moderate, and no major technical issues were detected. However, the absence of security headers and unknown SSL configuration suggest areas for improvement in security hardening. From a security perspective, the site lacks visible privacy and cookie policies, which is a compliance gap especially under GDPR. No incident response or vulnerability disclosure information is provided. The WHOIS data could not be retrieved due to query limits, limiting domain trust verification. Overall, the security posture is moderate but could be enhanced by implementing standard security headers, privacy policies, and incident response contacts. The overall risk assessment indicates a legitimate small business with a well-presented online presence but with room for improvement in security and privacy compliance. Strategic recommendations include adding privacy and cookie policies, enhancing security headers, verifying SSL configuration, and publishing incident response information to improve trust and compliance.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
10/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

10 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching kairi.lv

This scan found 25 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
15
Email security
85
DNS health
75
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
10
Average
46

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

SIA Kairi is a small hospitality business focused on the local Riga market, offering baked goods and event catering services. Their competitive advantage lies in homemade quality products and personalized service for events. Revenue streams likely include retail sales and catering orders. The target customer segments are local residents, event organizers, and families. The company maintains an active social media presence to engage customers. Growth indicators are not explicit but the professional website and customer testimonials suggest a stable local reputation. No partnerships or subsidiaries were identified. The business operates independently with a clear focus on quality and customer satisfaction.

Security posture

The current security maturity level is basic to moderate. The website uses HTTPS (assumed but not confirmed), but lacks important security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and Strict-Transport-Security. No privacy or cookie policies are present, indicating compliance gaps with GDPR. No incident response or vulnerability disclosure mechanisms are provided. The absence of forms reduces attack surface but also limits user engagement features. No third-party analytics or tracking scripts were detected, minimizing privacy risks but also limiting business intelligence. Overall, the security culture appears minimal with opportunities to improve compliance and technical security controls.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive privacy and cookie policies to ensure GDPR compliance.
  2. Add essential security headers (CSP, HSTS, X-Frame-Options, X-Content-Type-Options) to enhance protection against common web attacks.
  3. Verify and enforce HTTPS with strong SSL/TLS configuration.
  4. Publish a security.txt file and provide incident response contact information to improve transparency and readiness.
  5. Regularly audit and update third-party scripts and dependencies to mitigate vulnerabilities.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
SIA Kairi
Registration number
40103969541
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
SIA Kairi
Description
SIA Kairi is a café and confectionery located in Āgenskalns, Riga, offering cakes, tortes, sweets, and savory snacks for events such as weddings, birthdays, corporate events, and children's parties. They accept orders and bake on-site, providing dine-in and takeaway options.
Key services
Cakes, Tortes, Savory snacks, Event catering, Dine-in and takeaway
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Next.js, React, JavaScript
Frameworks
Next.js
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
40/100

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges.
  2. No privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found, indicating compliance gaps.
  3. Contact information is clearly presented with email, phone, and physical address.
  4. No forms detected on the site, limiting data collection risks.
  5. Social media presence on Facebook, Twitter, and Instagram.
  6. Modern web technology stack using Next.js and React.
  7. No security headers detected in provided data; SSL status unknown.
  8. No analytics or tracking scripts detected, indicating minimal user tracking.
  9. Content is relevant and professionally presented for a small hospitality business.
  10. No evidence of adult or questionable content.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a modern JavaScript stack using Next.js and React, enabling server-side rendering and good SEO capabilities. The site is mobile-optimized with responsive design and clear navigation. Performance is moderate, with deferred loading of scripts and CSS preloading. No CMS or hosting provider information was detected. The absence of analytics and tracking scripts suggests minimal data collection. Accessibility features are basic but present. Technical debt appears low, though security best practices need enhancement. Opportunities exist to improve performance and security through header implementation and SSL verification.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with kairi.lv. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review kairi.lv.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.