Skip to main content

Security report for jwpconnatix.com

JWP Connatix · Media · United States

Medium risk. 3 critical or high findings in Security headers and SSL/TLS.

Security score

74/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

JWP Connatix operates a video technology and monetization platform targeting broadcasters, publishers, and advertisers. The company offers solutions for live streaming, video on demand, advertising, and audience engagement, positioning itself as a trusted partner for top media brands. The website reflects a modern digital presence built on HubSpot CMS, integrating JW Player technology and marketing tools such as Google Tag Manager and Facebook Pixel. The business is newly established in 2024, with a clear focus on media industry clients. Technically, the website employs contemporary technologies and demonstrates good mobile optimization and SEO practices. The presence of a OneTrust cookie consent banner indicates awareness of privacy compliance, although no explicit privacy policy or terms of service pages were found. Security posture is adequate with HTTPS enabled, but lacks advanced security headers and DNSSEC, which are recommended for enhanced protection. Overall, the security posture is moderate with no critical vulnerabilities detected. The absence of contact emails and phone numbers limits direct communication channels, and the lack of formal privacy and security policies suggests areas for compliance improvement. The domain registration data aligns with the website content, supporting legitimacy despite the recent domain age. Strategically, the company should prioritize publishing comprehensive privacy and terms of service documents, enable DNSSEC, and implement security headers to strengthen trust and compliance. Enhancing contact information visibility and establishing a vulnerability disclosure policy would further improve security culture and customer confidence.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
88/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

3 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1
    • High

      Weak SSL Key Length

      SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

      What to do: Use at least 2048-bit RSA or 256-bit ECC key

      • CWE-326
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • Mozilla TLS: Mozilla Server Side TLS 6.0 intermediate: rsa_key_size 2048

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching jwpconnatix.com

This scan found 19 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
57
Security headers
45
Email security
70
DNS health
85
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
88
Average
74

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

JWP Connatix targets the media sector with a specialized video technology platform that supports monetization and audience engagement. Its competitive advantage lies in integrating live and on-demand video with advertising capabilities, appealing to broadcasters and publishers seeking scalable solutions. The business model likely includes SaaS or platform licensing with revenue from media clients and advertisers. The company is positioned as a medium-sized enterprise with a focus on the US market, particularly New York. The use of HubSpot CMS and advanced video player technology indicates a mature digital marketing approach. Partnerships or subsidiaries were not identified, suggesting a standalone operation or early-stage growth. The absence of detailed contact information and compliance documents may impact customer trust and regulatory adherence.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a baseline security posture with HTTPS enforced and cookie consent mechanisms in place. However, the lack of DNSSEC and security headers such as Content-Security-Policy or X-Frame-Options represents missed opportunities to mitigate common web threats. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were detected in the provided content. The absence of a published security policy or incident response contacts limits transparency and preparedness for security incidents. Compliance with GDPR is partially indicated by the cookie banner but lacks supporting documentation. Overall, the security maturity is moderate, suitable for a new business but requiring enhancements to meet industry best practices and regulatory expectations.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a comprehensive privacy policy and terms of service to improve compliance and user trust.
  2. Enable DNSSEC on the domain to enhance DNS security and prevent spoofing.
  3. Implement standard security headers (CSP, X-Frame-Options, X-XSS-Protection) to protect against common web attacks.
  4. Add clear contact information including company emails and phone numbers for support and security incident reporting.
  5. Develop and publish a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file to encourage responsible reporting.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
JWP Connatix
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
JWP Connatix
Description
Monetize, manage, and scale video content with JWPC—trusted by top media brands for live, VOD, advertising, and audience engagement solutions.
Key services
live video streaming, video on demand (VOD), advertising solutions, audience engagement
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
JW Player (jwpsrv.js), Google Tag Manager, Facebook Pixel, OneTrust Cookie Consent, HubSpot CMS
Platforms
HubSpot
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled
  • Cookie consent banner implemented

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics (via Google Tag Manager)
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Facebook Pixel
Marketing tools
Facebook Pixel, OneTrust Cookie Consent
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is professionally designed and uses modern technologies.
  2. Cookie consent and tracking scripts are implemented with OneTrust and Google Tag Manager.
  3. No privacy policy or terms of service pages found, which is a compliance gap.
  4. No explicit contact emails or phone numbers found; only postal address in New York.
  5. No security.txt or vulnerability disclosure policy found.
  6. Domain is newly registered and uses GoDaddy registrar with standard domain control name servers.
  7. No WAF or blocking mechanisms detected; site content is fully accessible.
  8. No adult or questionable content detected; site is safe for general audiences.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on HubSpot CMS and integrates JW Player for video delivery, supported by Google Tag Manager and Facebook Pixel for analytics and marketing. The domain is registered with GoDaddy and uses standard domain control name servers without DNSSEC. The site loads multiple CSS and JS assets asynchronously, indicating performance optimization efforts. Mobile responsiveness and SEO meta tags are well implemented. However, the absence of advanced security headers and DNSSEC suggests technical debt in security hardening. The site performance is moderate, with potential for improvement by auditing third-party scripts and optimizing resource loading further. Overall, the technical infrastructure is modern but could benefit from enhanced security configurations and compliance documentation.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with jwpconnatix.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review jwpconnatix.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.