Skip to main content

Security report for jvm.at

Jung von Matt · Media · Austria

High risk. 7 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view and SSL/TLS.

Security score

47/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Jung von Matt is a well-established independent global creative agency specializing in marketing communications and branding services. The company targets brands and businesses seeking innovative and culturally impactful marketing solutions. Their website reflects a strong market position with a professional design, consistent branding, and comprehensive content showcasing their key services and projects. The technical infrastructure leverages modern technologies such as Netlify hosting, Contentful CMS, Matomo analytics, and Usercentrics for consent management, indicating a mature digital presence. However, the website currently suffers from an invalid SSL certificate, which undermines the security posture and user trust. While privacy and cookie policies are well implemented and GDPR compliant, the absence of explicit security policies and incident response information suggests room for improvement in security transparency. Overall, the site is professional and trustworthy but should prioritize fixing SSL issues and enhancing security disclosures to improve its risk profile.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
0/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

7 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • Critical

      No HTTPS encryption

      GDPR requires appropriate security measures for personal data

      What to do: Implement SSL/TLS certificate for HTTPS

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • Critical

      No HTTPS Encryption

      Website does not use HTTPS encryption, making all data transmission vulnerable to interception

      What to do: Implement SSL/TLS certificate and redirect all HTTP traffic to HTTPS

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching jvm.at

This scan found 14 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
0
Security headers
80
Email security
50
DNS health
50
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
0
Average
47

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention jvm.at, from OffSeq Breach.

Total records
10
Employees
0
Customers
0
Third parties
10
Weak passwords
20%

See the 10 newest leaked credentials

A one-off add-on to this report that lists the most recent identifier and password pairs OffSeq Breach holds for jvm.at.

Select it in the checkout above.

Breach keeps ingesting new leaks, so these numbers can grow between scans.

Open in Breach(opens in a new tab)Monitor on Breach(opens in a new tab)

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company operates in the media sector as a creative agency with a large organizational size. It maintains a strong online presence with multiple offices and a partner educational site (jvm-academy.org). The business model focuses on providing creative marketing across channels and disciplines, targeting commercial brands. The website content and social media links indicate active engagement with clients and the industry. The use of advanced marketing tools and analytics supports data-driven decision-making. The lack of direct contact emails or phone numbers on the homepage suggests a preference for contact via forms, which may streamline lead management. The company demonstrates a consistent brand image and high-quality content, reinforcing its market position as a leading creative agency in Europe.

Security posture

The website implements several security best practices including a strict Content Security Policy, HSTS with preload, and other security headers like X-Frame-Options and X-Content-Type-Options. However, the SSL certificate is invalid or missing, which is a critical security flaw that significantly reduces the overall security score. No known vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected. The site lacks explicit security or incident response policies and does not provide contact channels for security incidents, which could hinder timely response to security issues. The use of modern hosting and analytics platforms is positive but should be complemented with proper SSL configuration and enhanced security transparency to meet enterprise security standards.

Recommendations

  1. Urgently fix the SSL certificate to enable proper HTTPS and secure user connections.
  2. Implement and publish a clear security policy and incident response plan accessible on the website.
  3. Enable DNSSEC and CAA records to improve domain security and certificate issuance control.
  4. Add explicit contact channels for security incidents such as security@ or abuse@ email addresses.
  5. Regularly audit and update security headers and TLS configurations to maintain best practices.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is hosted on Netlify and uses a modern tech stack including Contentful CMS, Matomo analytics, and Usercentrics for consent management. It employs ES modules and modern JavaScript, with responsive design and accessibility considerations evident in the CSS and HTML structure. Performance data was not provided, but the use of CDN-hosted assets and video placeholders suggests optimization efforts. SEO is supported by comprehensive meta tags, Open Graph, and JSON-LD structured data. The invalid SSL certificate is a significant technical risk. No CMS vulnerabilities or outdated libraries were detected. Overall, the technical implementation is modern and robust but requires immediate attention to SSL and TLS configurations.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with jvm.at. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review jvm.at.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.