Skip to main content

Security report for jut.dk

Jutlandia Terminal · Energy · Denmark

Medium risk. 4 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

72/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Jutlandia Terminal is a well-established Danish company specializing in comprehensive port logistics and offshore/onshore services, with a strong presence in the energy and transportation sectors. The company leverages 50 years of experience to provide high-quality terminal operations, stevedoring, logistics, chemical handling, wind logistics, port agency, and transport solutions. Their digital platform LIGHTHOUSE enhances project visibility with live updates, positioning them as a modern and reliable partner in the maritime logistics industry. Technically, the website is built on SilverStripe CMS and integrates modern technologies such as Google Maps API and Google Tag Manager, reflecting a mature digital infrastructure. The site is mobile-optimized, well-structured, and SEO-friendly, providing a good user experience. Security-wise, the site uses HTTPS with good SSL configuration and cookie consent mechanisms, though it could improve by enabling DNSSEC and adding more security headers. No blocking WAF or security challenges were detected, and WHOIS data confirms the domain's legitimacy and consistency with the business history. Overall, the website demonstrates a solid security posture, good privacy compliance, and strong business credibility.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
68/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

4 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  3. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching jut.dk

This scan found 21 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
35
Email security
70
DNS health
85
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
68
Average
72

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Jutlandia Terminal holds a strong market position as a key logistics partner in the renewable energy and offshore sectors, supported by its 50-year legacy and affiliation with Harbour Group Holding. The company targets businesses requiring specialized port and offshore logistics services, including wind energy firms and shipping companies. Their business model focuses on providing tailored, high-quality service solutions with a global transport network. Growth indicators include recent expansions and digital platform adoption. The company maintains a professional online presence with clear contact channels and trust signals such as certifications and testimonials. Strategic partnerships and sister companies under Harbour Group Holding enhance their ecosystem and market reach.

Security posture

The website exhibits a good security maturity level with HTTPS enforced and cookie consent implemented, aligning with GDPR requirements. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were detected. However, the absence of DNSSEC and some common security headers like Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options indicates room for improvement. The lack of a published security policy or incident response contact limits transparency in vulnerability management. Overall, the security posture is solid but could be enhanced by adopting additional best practices and formalizing incident response mechanisms.

Recommendations

  1. Enable DNSSEC on the domain to strengthen DNS security and prevent spoofing.
  2. Implement additional HTTP security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and Referrer-Policy.
  3. Publish a dedicated security policy page including incident response contacts to improve transparency and trust.
  4. Add a security.txt file at the root of the website to facilitate responsible vulnerability disclosure.
  5. Regularly audit third-party scripts and tracking tools to minimize privacy risks and improve compliance.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
Jutlandia Terminal
Registration number
13835233
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Jutlandia Terminal
Description
Jutlandia Terminal offers complete port logistics services from locations at Esbjerg and Aarhus harbors. They specialize in stevedoring, port agency, wind logistics, terminal services, transport solutions, and chemical handling.
Key services
Terminal operations, Stevedoring, Logistics solutions, Chemical handling, Wind logistics, Port agency, Transport, Digital platform LIGHTHOUSE
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Google Maps API, SilverStripe CMS, Google Fonts, FontAwesome, Swiper.js
Frameworks
SilverStripe
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
80/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled
  • No exposed sensitive data found
  • Cookie consent mechanism implemented

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics (via Google Tag Manager)
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is professionally designed and content-rich
  2. Clear focus on port logistics and offshore services
  3. Good use of modern web technologies and Google services
  4. Privacy and cookie policies are present and GDPR compliant
  5. Contact information is clearly available with multiple channels
  6. No security blocking or WAF detected
  7. WHOIS data supports legitimacy and long-standing business presence
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses SilverStripe CMS, a robust and flexible platform suitable for enterprise-grade content management. Integration of Google Maps API and Google Tag Manager indicates a modern approach to user engagement and analytics. The site loads with moderate performance, is mobile-optimized, and includes SEO best practices such as meta tags and Open Graph data. Accessibility features are basic but present. Technical debt appears low, though enabling DNSSEC and enhancing security headers would reduce risk. The site is hosted on an unspecified provider but uses HTTPS with a valid SSL certificate. Overall, the technical infrastructure supports the business needs effectively with opportunities for security and performance enhancements.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with jut.dk. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review jut.dk.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.