Skip to main content

Security report for jurmalasslimnica.lv

Jūrmalas slimnīca · Healthcare · Latvia

Medium risk. 4 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view and SSL/TLS.

Security score

75/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Jūrmalas slimnīca is a municipal capital company providing multi-profile and emergency healthcare services to patients across Latvia and abroad. The website reflects a professional healthcare provider with a clear focus on diagnostics, surgical treatments, maternity care, and emergency assistance. The organization maintains certifications such as ISO 9001, enhancing its credibility. The site targets patients and visitors seeking medical services in the Jūrmala region. Technically, the website is built on WordPress with a modern plugin ecosystem, including Yoast SEO, CookieYes for consent management, and WPBakery Page Builder for content management. The site is mobile-optimized, accessible, and SEO-friendly, with good content quality and navigation clarity. Security posture is solid with HTTPS enforced and privacy compliance mechanisms in place, though security headers could be improved. No WHOIS data was available due to query limits, but the domain and website content appear consistent and legitimate. Overall, the site demonstrates a mature digital presence suitable for a regional healthcare provider.

Scanned

This is an earlier scan of jurmalasslimnica.lv. View the latest report

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
40/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

4 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      Third-party services without privacy policy

      Detected services: Facebook, YouTube, Google APIs

      What to do: Document all third-party data sharing in your privacy policy

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching jurmalasslimnica.lv

This scan found 19 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
85
Email security
75
DNS health
80
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
40
Average
75

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention jurmalasslimnica.lv, from OffSeq Breach.

No leaked records found

Breach holds no records for jurmalasslimnica.lv right now. New leaks arrive continuously, so monitoring on Breach alerts you if that changes.

Monitor on Breach (opens in a new tab)

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The business operates as a healthcare service provider under the jurisdiction of the Jūrmala City Municipality, serving a medium-sized market with a focus on comprehensive medical services including diagnostics, surgery, and emergency care. The website supports multilingual access (Latvian and English), indicating an intent to serve both local and international patients. The presence of patient testimonials, certifications, and detailed service descriptions suggests a well-established market position. The business model is service-oriented, relying on patient visits and treatments. Partnerships with local government and health tourism clusters are indicated by logos and links. The company maintains transparency with detailed contact information and privacy policies, supporting trust and compliance. Growth indicators include digital skill training projects and EU fund-supported initiatives.

Security posture

The website enforces HTTPS and uses cookie consent management compliant with GDPR, reflecting a good privacy and security baseline. Email addresses are obfuscated to reduce spam risk. However, no explicit security headers (e.g., CSP, HSTS) were detected, which could enhance protection against common web attacks. The use of popular WordPress plugins necessitates regular updates to mitigate vulnerabilities. No incident response or security policy pages were found, which could improve preparedness and transparency. Overall, the security posture is good but could benefit from additional hardening and documented incident response mechanisms.

Recommendations

  1. Implement HTTP security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, Strict-Transport-Security, X-Frame-Options, and X-XSS-Protection.
  2. Establish and publish a security policy and incident response contact information on the website.
  3. Regularly audit and update WordPress core and plugins to minimize vulnerability exposure.
  4. Enhance form security with CAPTCHA or anti-spam measures to prevent abuse.
  5. Consider adding a dedicated Data Protection Officer contact to strengthen GDPR compliance.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
SIA “Jūrmalas slimnīca”
Registration number
130020302
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Jūrmalas slimnīca
Description
Jūrmalas slimnīca ir daudzprofilu un neatliekamās palīdzības ārstniecības iestāde, kurā tiek sniegti veselības aprūpes pakalpojumi pacientiem no visas Latvijas un ārvalstīm.
Key services
Diagnostics, Surgical treatments, Emergency medical assistance, Gynecology and maternity care, Plastic surgery, Physiotherapy
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, PHP, jQuery, Bootstrap, Slider Revolution, Yoast SEO, CookieYes (cookie consent), Polylang (multilingual), Contact Form 7, WPBakery Page Builder, QuadMenu, Better Recent Comments, SVG Support, Email Encoder Bundle, YOP Poll
Frameworks
Bootstrap
Platforms
WordPress
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent with detailed categories
  • Email addresses obfuscated
  • Use of security plugins (e.g., Email Encoder Bundle)

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Tracking pixels
CookieYes, SearchIQ
Marketing tools
Yoast SEO, YOP Poll
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with rich content.
  2. Strong presence of privacy and cookie compliance mechanisms.
  3. Multiple patient testimonials and certifications enhance trust.
  4. WHOIS data unavailable, limiting domain trust verification.
  5. No signs of malicious or adult content.
  6. Uses modern WordPress ecosystem plugins and themes.
  7. Contact information is clearly presented and verified.
  8. No visible security headers detected; opportunity for improvement.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress CMS with a robust set of plugins for SEO, accessibility, cookie consent, and content management. It uses Bootstrap for responsive design and jQuery for interactive elements. The site loads external resources from reputable CDNs and integrates social media and search functionalities. Performance is moderate with lazy loading images and optimized scripts. Accessibility features include a dedicated accessibility toolbar and localized date pickers. SEO is enhanced by Yoast SEO plugin and structured data in JSON-LD format. The site is mobile-friendly and well-structured, though some CSS and JavaScript could be further optimized for speed. Hosting provider details are not explicitly identified. Overall, the technical infrastructure supports a professional and user-friendly healthcare website.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Earlier scans of this domain

  1. 75/100Medium28 findingsView report
Reviews of this site

Share your experience with jurmalasslimnica.lv. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review jurmalasslimnica.lv.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.