Skip to main content

Security report for juratroislacs.ch

Jura & Trois-Lacs Tourisme · Hospitality · Switzerland

Medium risk. 4 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

73/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Jura & Trois-Lacs Tourisme operates a professional regional tourism website promoting the Jura & Trois-Lacs region in Switzerland. The site offers comprehensive information on outdoor activities, cultural sites, accommodations, and events, targeting tourists and families. It also provides an integrated online booking platform for accommodations and activities, enhancing user convenience and engagement. The website is well-branded and consistent with its regional tourism mission. Technically, the website employs modern web technologies including JavaScript, jQuery, Google Tag Manager, and Cookiebot for consent management. It uses the MyCity Tourism Information System CMS, which supports multilingual content and responsive design. The site demonstrates good performance and accessibility standards, with structured navigation and SEO-friendly metadata. From a security perspective, the site enforces HTTPS and uses cookie consent mechanisms, Google reCAPTCHA, and marketing automation tools responsibly. However, explicit security headers and a published security policy or incident response contacts are absent, representing areas for improvement. No vulnerabilities or suspicious activities were detected in the analyzed content. Overall, the website presents a low-risk profile with strong business credibility and privacy compliance. Strategic enhancements in security transparency and contact information could further strengthen trust and resilience.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
65/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

4 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      Third-party services without privacy policy

      Detected services: Google Analytics, Facebook, LinkedIn, YouTube

      What to do: Document all third-party data sharing in your privacy policy

  3. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak SSL Key Length

      SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

      What to do: Use at least 2048-bit RSA or 256-bit ECC key

      • CWE-326
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • Mozilla TLS: Mozilla Server Side TLS 6.0 intermediate: rsa_key_size 2048

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching juratroislacs.ch

This scan found 20 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
65
Security headers
55
Email security
70
DNS health
80
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
65
Average
73

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The website serves as the official tourism portal for the Jura & Trois-Lacs region, positioning itself as a key regional destination marketing organization. Its business model revolves around promoting tourism activities, cultural experiences, and accommodations, while facilitating online bookings. The target market includes tourists interested in nature, outdoor sports, cultural heritage, and family-friendly excursions. The platform leverages partnerships with local service providers and integrates marketing automation to drive engagement and conversions. The presence of multilingual content and detailed navigation supports a broad audience reach. The absence of direct contact emails or phone numbers suggests a preference for managed communication channels, likely to streamline inquiries and bookings.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a mature security posture with mandatory HTTPS encryption and cookie consent management aligned with GDPR requirements. The use of Google reCAPTCHA adds protection against automated abuse. However, the lack of explicit security headers such as X-Frame-Options and X-Content-Type-Options, and the absence of a public security policy or incident response contacts, indicate gaps in security transparency and preparedness. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were identified. The site would benefit from publishing a vulnerability disclosure policy and enhancing security header implementation to mitigate potential risks and improve trustworthiness.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and verify comprehensive security headers including X-Frame-Options and X-Content-Type-Options.
  2. Publish a clear security policy and incident response contact information on the website.
  3. Establish and publicize a vulnerability disclosure program or security.txt file.
  4. Regularly audit and update third-party scripts and libraries to prevent vulnerabilities.
  5. Enhance contact information availability to improve user trust and support.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Jura & Trois-Lacs Tourisme
Description
La région Jura & Trois-Lacs en Suisse et sa nature intacte sont idéales pour les randonnées, excursions à vélo, visites de musées, restaurants et hébergements insolites. Excursions en famille, vacances, excursions, hôtels, restaurants, gastronomie et nature.
Key services
Tourism information, Online activity and accommodation booking, Event promotion, Travel planning
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
JavaScript, jQuery, Google Tag Manager, Google Analytics 4, Cookiebot, Mapbox, MyCity Tourism Information System
Frameworks
Bootstrap (implied by CSS classes and components)
Platforms
Web
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent with consent management
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Use of CAPTCHA (Google reCAPTCHA)
  • No vulnerable libraries detected in scripts

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics 4, Google Ads Conversion Tracking
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Google Ads, Cookiebot, Marketing Automation Service (KOI)
Marketing tools
Cookiebot, Marketing Automation Service (KOI), Chatbase chatbot
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is a professional regional tourism portal for Jura & Trois-Lacs in Switzerland.
  2. Content is comprehensive and well-structured with multilingual support.
  3. Strong focus on user experience with online booking and detailed navigation.
  4. Good privacy and cookie compliance with explicit policies and consent mechanisms.
  5. Use of modern tracking and marketing tools balanced with privacy considerations.
  6. No signs of malicious or suspicious activity detected.
  7. No explicit security policy or incident response information publicly available.
  8. No visible contact emails or phone numbers; contact is via form only.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a modern technology stack featuring JavaScript, jQuery, and Google Tag Manager, integrated with the MyCity Tourism Information System CMS. It employs responsive design techniques and accessibility best practices, ensuring usability across devices. Performance is moderate, with room for optimization in loading times. SEO is well addressed through meta tags, Open Graph data, and structured navigation. The site uses external services for analytics, marketing automation, and cookie consent, balancing functionality with privacy compliance. Technical risks are minimal, but ongoing maintenance of third-party dependencies and security configurations is recommended to sustain operational integrity.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with juratroislacs.ch. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review juratroislacs.ch.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.