Skip to main content

Security report for juraosia.lt

Jūra Ošia Apartments · Hospitality · Lithuania

Medium risk. 7 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 1 other check.

Security score

63/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Jūra Ošia Apartments is a newly established hospitality business offering coastal vacation rentals near Palanga, Lithuania. The website presents a professional and visually appealing platform showcasing the apartments, amenities, and booking options. The business targets vacationers seeking serene seaside getaways with high-quality accommodations and natural surroundings. Technically, the site is built using Hostinger's Website Builder with Astro framework and modern web technologies, hosted by Hostinger operations, UAB. The site demonstrates good mobile optimization and SEO practices but lacks advanced accessibility features and comprehensive privacy compliance. Security posture is moderate with HTTPS implied but missing explicit security headers and policies. Contact information is clearly provided, including email and phone, along with social media presence on Facebook and Instagram. Overall, the website reflects a credible small hospitality business with room for improvement in privacy and security policies.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
10/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

7 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching juraosia.lt

This scan found 22 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
75
Security headers
70
Email security
55
DNS health
70
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
10
Average
63

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The business operates in the hospitality sector, focusing on vacation apartment rentals in a niche coastal market. It leverages online booking and visual content to attract customers. The company is small-sized, recently founded in 2024, and positions itself as a premium coastal getaway provider. The website's content and structure support a direct-to-consumer rental model with no evident third-party partnerships or affiliate programs. Social media integration suggests active marketing efforts. The lack of detailed business registration or VAT information is typical for small startups but should be addressed for enhanced credibility.

Security posture

The website uses HTTPS, ensuring encrypted communication, but lacks visible security headers such as Content Security Policy, X-Frame-Options, or HSTS, which are recommended for enhanced protection. No vulnerability disclosure or incident response information is published, indicating limited security transparency. Forms are present but no explicit security measures or CAPTCHA mechanisms are noted. No analytics or tracking scripts reduce privacy risks but also limit user behavior insights. Overall, the security posture is basic and would benefit from implementing standard web security best practices and publishing relevant policies.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a comprehensive privacy policy and cookie policy to improve GDPR compliance and user trust.
  2. Implement and configure security headers (CSP, HSTS, X-Frame-Options) to enhance site security.
  3. Add a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file to demonstrate security transparency.
  4. Enhance accessibility features to improve usability for all users.
  5. Consider integrating analytics with privacy-respecting configurations to better understand user behavior.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Jūra Ošia Apartments
Description
Jūra Ošia Apartments offers coastal vacation rentals with stunning views, photo gallery, easy booking, and availability calendar. The apartments provide a serene environment inspired by the sea, located close to wild beaches and pine forests, with high-quality interior design emphasizing natural wood and comfort.
Key services
Vacation apartment rentals, Online booking, Photo gallery showcasing property, Availability calendar
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Hostinger Website Builder, Google Fonts, Astro framework, JavaScript
Frameworks
Astro
Platforms
Hostinger hosting
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
60/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS usage implied by canonical URL (https://juraosia.lt/)

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is a professionally designed small hospitality business site for vacation rentals.
  2. No privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found, which is a compliance gap.
  3. Contact information is clearly provided including email and phone.
  4. No advanced security policies or incident response information published.
  5. No analytics or advertising scripts detected, indicating minimal tracking.
  6. Social media presence on Facebook and Instagram is linked.
  7. Domain is very new but consistent with business launch timeline.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a modern tech stack using Hostinger Website Builder and Astro framework, leveraging Google Fonts and optimized images/videos from external CDNs. Hosting is provided by Hostinger operations, UAB, a reputable provider. The site shows good mobile responsiveness and SEO optimization with proper meta tags and structured data (JSON-LD). Performance is moderate with video backgrounds and high-resolution images, which may impact load times on slower connections. No major technical debt or deprecated technologies detected. Opportunities exist to improve accessibility and security configurations.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with juraosia.lt. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review juraosia.lt.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.