Skip to main content

Security report for jup.ag

Registrant of jup.ag · Technology · United Kingdom

Medium risk. 8 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 2 other checks.

Security score

65/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Jupiter is a medium-sized technology and finance company operating a decentralized trading platform primarily on the Solana blockchain. The platform offers a comprehensive DeFi superapp experience including spot trading, perpetuals, lending (in beta), and portfolio management. It targets cryptocurrency traders and DeFi users seeking deep liquidity and low fees. The company was founded in 2021 and maintains a consistent and professional brand presence with active social media engagement. Technically, the website is built on a modern stack using Next.js and React, hosted and protected by Cloudflare, ensuring fast performance and excellent mobile optimization. Security posture is strong with HTTPS enforced and domain transfer protections in place, though DNSSEC is not enabled. However, the site lacks published privacy and cookie policies, incident response information, and explicit contact details, which are important for compliance and trust. Overall, the platform is trustworthy and well-positioned in the DeFi market but should improve transparency and compliance documentation.

Scanned

This is an earlier scan of jup.ag. View the latest report

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
35/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

8 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching jup.ag

This scan found 22 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
75
Security headers
30
Email security
85
DNS health
65
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
35
Average
65

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Jupiter holds a strong market position as one of the largest decentralized exchanges on Solana, leveraging a community-driven governance model. Its business model revolves around providing decentralized trading services with additional DeFi features such as lending and portfolio tracking. Revenue likely derives from trading fees and possibly lending interest. The target audience includes active crypto traders and DeFi enthusiasts on Solana. The company demonstrates growth potential through continuous feature expansion and community engagement. Partnerships are evident with related domains like studio.jup.ag and support portals. The absence of detailed business contact information and compliance documents suggests room for maturity in corporate governance and regulatory adherence.

Security posture

The website exhibits a mature security posture with HTTPS enforced, Cloudflare DNS and CDN protection, and domain transfer lock status. No critical vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the HTML content. However, the lack of DNSSEC and absence of published security policies or incident response contacts represent gaps. No vulnerability disclosure program or security certifications are mentioned. The site uses modern JavaScript libraries and frameworks without visible outdated or vulnerable components. Overall, the security posture is good but could be enhanced by publishing formal security policies, enabling DNSSEC, and providing clear incident response channels.

Recommendations

  1. Publish comprehensive privacy and cookie policies with GDPR compliance details.
  2. Implement a cookie consent mechanism to comply with privacy regulations.
  3. Enable DNSSEC to strengthen DNS security.
  4. Provide explicit contact information including security and incident response contacts.
  5. Establish and publicize a vulnerability disclosure program or security.txt file.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Registrant of jup.ag
Description
Jupiter is one of the largest decentralized trading platforms and one of the most active governance communities in crypto. We're building the everything exchange for everyone.
Key services
Decentralized trading, Governance community, Swap, Perpetuals trading, Lending (Beta), Portfolio management
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
React, Next.js, Cloudflare, Web3 modal, TradingView charting library
Frameworks
Next.js
Platforms
Solana blockchain
Performance
fast
Mobile
excellent
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Domain status clientTransferProhibited
  • Use of Cloudflare DNS and CDN

Analytics and tracking

Services
Cloudflare Insights
Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Cloudflare Insights
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is a professional DeFi platform focused on Solana blockchain.
  2. No explicit privacy or cookie policies found, which is a compliance gap.
  3. Strong social media presence and community engagement.
  4. Modern tech stack with Next.js and React.
  5. Good security posture with HTTPS and Cloudflare protection.
  6. No contact emails or phone numbers explicitly provided on the site.
  7. No vulnerability disclosure or incident response info published.
  8. No security certifications or compliance frameworks mentioned.
  9. No suspicious or malicious content detected.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built using Next.js and React, leveraging Cloudflare for DNS and CDN services, which contributes to fast loading times and excellent mobile responsiveness. The use of TradingView's charting library and Web3 modal indicates integration with advanced financial and blockchain technologies. The site has valid meta tags for SEO and social media sharing (Open Graph and Twitter cards). Accessibility features appear adequate, and the site structure supports good navigation clarity. No CMS was detected, suggesting a custom or framework-based build. Performance is optimized, but the absence of explicit security headers in the HTML source suggests reliance on Cloudflare defaults. Overall, the technical infrastructure is modern and robust, supporting the platform's business needs effectively.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Earlier scans of this domain

  1. 65/100 −3Medium31 findingsView report
  2. 68/100Medium29 findingsView report
Reviews of this site

Share your experience with jup.ag. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review jup.ag.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.