Skip to main content

Security report for jup.ag

Registrant of jup.ag · Technology · United Kingdom

Medium risk. 7 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

68/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Jupiter is a decentralized trading platform operating primarily in the cryptocurrency sector, focusing on Solana blockchain assets. It positions itself as one of the largest decentralized exchanges with an active governance community, offering services such as spot trading, perpetual contracts, and portfolio management. The platform targets crypto traders and investors seeking a comprehensive exchange experience. Technically, the website is built using modern web technologies including React and Next.js, hosted and DNS-managed via Cloudflare, ensuring good performance and mobile optimization. Security posture is solid with HTTPS enforced and domain transfer protections in place, though DNSSEC is not enabled and explicit security policies are not publicly disclosed. Privacy compliance is weak due to the absence of privacy and cookie policies. Overall, Jupiter presents a professional and trustworthy platform with room for improvement in privacy and security transparency.

Scanned

This is an earlier scan of jup.ag. View the latest report

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
35/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

7 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching jup.ag

This scan found 21 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
75
Security headers
30
Email security
85
DNS health
80
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
35
Average
68

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Jupiter operates in the competitive decentralized finance (DeFi) space, leveraging the Solana blockchain to offer fast and low-cost trading services. Its business model revolves around providing decentralized exchange services combined with community governance, which may include token-based voting and platform development input. The platform's market position as a leading Solana DEX is supported by its active community and broad service offerings. Revenue streams likely include trading fees and possibly token-related incentives. The company maintains a strong social media presence across major platforms, enhancing community engagement and marketing reach. The domain registration and technical infrastructure reflect a medium-sized, technology-focused business with a growth-oriented approach.

Security posture

The website enforces HTTPS and uses Cloudflare DNS services, which provide baseline security and performance benefits. The domain status clientTransferProhibited prevents unauthorized domain transfers, enhancing domain security. However, the lack of DNSSEC implementation is a notable gap that could expose the domain to DNS spoofing attacks. No explicit security headers or policies are visible in the HTML content, and there is no public security or incident response contact information, which limits transparency and responsiveness to security incidents. Privacy policies and cookie consent mechanisms are absent, indicating potential compliance issues with GDPR and other privacy regulations. Overall, the security posture is moderate but could be significantly improved by adopting DNSSEC, publishing security policies, and enhancing privacy compliance.

Recommendations

  1. Enable DNSSEC on the domain to strengthen DNS security and prevent spoofing.
  2. Publish a comprehensive privacy policy and cookie policy with clear GDPR compliance statements.
  3. Implement and publicly disclose a security policy including incident response procedures and contact channels.
  4. Add explicit security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to the website.
  5. Enhance transparency by providing verified company contact information including emails and phone numbers.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Registrant of jup.ag
Description
Jupiter is one of the largest decentralized trading platforms and one of the most active governance communities in crypto. We're building the everything exchange for everyone.
Key services
decentralized trading, governance community, spot trading, perpetuals trading, portfolio management
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
React, Next.js, Cloudflare, Web3 modal, TradingView charting library
Frameworks
Next.js
Platforms
Web
Performance
fast
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Domain status clientTransferProhibited
  • Use of Cloudflare DNS

Analytics and tracking

Services
Cloudflare Insights
Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Cloudflare Insights
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is a decentralized crypto trading platform with active governance community.
  2. No explicit privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found on homepage.
  3. No direct contact emails or phone numbers found in visible content.
  4. Social media presence is strong with Twitter, Discord, Telegram, YouTube, Reddit links.
  5. Uses modern web technologies and Cloudflare for DNS and hosting.
  6. No security.txt or vulnerability disclosure page detected.
  7. No explicit security or incident response contact information found.
  8. DNSSEC not enabled which is a minor security gap.
  9. No adult or questionable content detected; content is safe for general audience.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a modern React/Next.js framework, leveraging Cloudflare for DNS and hosting, which contributes to fast loading times and good mobile responsiveness. The use of TradingView charting libraries and Web3 modal integration indicates advanced technical capabilities tailored for crypto trading. The site includes well-structured meta tags and Open Graph data for SEO and social sharing. However, no CMS is detected, suggesting a custom-built solution. Accessibility features are basic but present. The absence of DNSSEC and some security headers indicates minor technical debt in security best practices. Overall, the technical infrastructure is robust and modern but can benefit from enhanced security configurations.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Earlier scans of this domain

  1. 65/100Medium31 findingsView report
  2. 65/100Medium31 findingsView report
Reviews of this site

Share your experience with jup.ag. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review jup.ag.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.