Skip to main content

Security report for jumtusegumucentrs.lv

Jumtu Segumu Centrs · Real Estate · Latvia

Medium risk. 8 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 1 other check.

Security score

59/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Jumtu Segumu Centrs is a Latvian company specializing in roofing materials and services, including roof coverings, inspections, project design, installation, and facade renovations. The company claims over 20 years of experience and has installed more than 700 roofs, positioning itself as a trusted local expert in the roofing sector. The website is built on WordPress using Elementor and related plugins, featuring good SEO practices and structured data to enhance search visibility. Contact information, including phone numbers and physical addresses, is clearly presented, along with social media links to Facebook and Instagram. However, WHOIS data is unavailable due to query limits, which limits domain trust verification. The site uses HTTPS but lacks some security headers and cookie consent mechanisms, indicating room for improvement in security and privacy compliance. Overall, the website is professional, content-rich, and user-friendly, targeting Latvian customers seeking roofing solutions.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
10/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

8 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching jumtusegumucentrs.lv

This scan found 26 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
62
Security headers
30
Email security
65
DNS health
85
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
10
Average
59

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The business operates primarily in the real estate and construction sectors, focusing on roofing and facade services. Its business model combines B2B and B2C sales of roofing materials and related services. The company leverages its extensive experience and local reputation to attract customers. The website's content and social media presence support brand trust and customer engagement. There is no evidence of partnerships or subsidiaries from the website data. The absence of WHOIS transparency slightly reduces credibility but does not negate the professional presentation and clear contact channels.

Security posture

The website employs HTTPS, ensuring encrypted communication. However, it lacks several recommended security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options, which could improve protection against common web attacks. No security.txt or incident response information is published, limiting transparency in security management. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the content. The absence of a cookie consent banner suggests incomplete GDPR compliance. Overall, the security posture is moderate but could be enhanced with additional headers, privacy mechanisms, and published security policies.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-XSS-Protection.
  2. Add a cookie consent banner to comply with GDPR and inform users about cookie usage.
  3. Publish a security policy and incident response contact information to improve transparency and trust.
  4. Consider adding a security.txt file to facilitate vulnerability disclosures and improve security culture.
  5. Improve WHOIS transparency by ensuring domain registration details are accessible and consistent with business information.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Jumtu Segumu Centrs
Description
Jumtu Segumu centrs - visa veida un izmēra jumtu segumi, jumtu materiāli, jumtu apsekošana, jumtu segumu apdares materiāli, jumtu darbu tāmēšana.
Key services
Roof coverings, Roof materials sales, Roof inspection and consultation, Roof project design, Roof installation and renovation, Facade renovation, Transport services
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, Elementor, Elementskit, jQuery, FontAwesome
Frameworks
WordPress
Platforms
WordPress CMS
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
70/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Marketing tools
Rank Math SEO plugin
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is a Latvian roofing materials and services company site
  2. Content is in Latvian with English language tags
  3. No WHOIS data available due to query limit error
  4. No visible security.txt or incident response info
  5. No cookie consent banner detected
  6. HTTPS is enabled
  7. No obvious security headers detected
  8. Social media presence on Facebook and Instagram
  9. Contact phone number and physical address clearly displayed
  10. Uses WordPress CMS with Elementor and plugins
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress CMS with Elementor and Elementskit plugins, using jQuery and FontAwesome for UI elements. The site is mobile optimized with responsive design and good SEO metadata including Open Graph and JSON-LD structured data. Performance is moderate, with no major issues detected in the HTML structure. Accessibility features are basic but present. Hosting provider details are not discernible from the content. The site lacks advanced analytics or tracking scripts, indicating minimal user tracking. Overall, the technical implementation is solid but could benefit from enhanced security and privacy features.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with jumtusegumucentrs.lv. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review jumtusegumucentrs.lv.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.