Skip to main content

Security report for julianus.ee

Julianus Inkasso · Finance · Estonia

High risk. 10 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 2 other checks.

Security score

45/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Julianus Inkasso is a well-established Estonian debt collection company founded in 1995, operating as a leading provider in Estonia and the Baltic region. The company offers comprehensive credit management services including debt collection, legal proceedings, and purchase of debt portfolios. It is part of the Aktiva Finance Group, which enhances its market position and operational scale. The website reflects a professional and consistent brand image, targeting both debtors and creditors with multilingual support and self-service portals. Technically, the site is built on WordPress with modern plugins and analytics tools, ensuring good performance and SEO optimization. Security posture is solid with HTTPS and cookie consent mechanisms, though explicit security policies and incident response contacts are not publicly disclosed. Overall, the domain registration and website content align well, indicating a trustworthy and credible business presence.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
10/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

10 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching julianus.ee

This scan found 28 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
82
Security headers
15
Email security
75
DNS health
65
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
10
Average
45

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Julianus Inkasso holds a strong market position as a debt collection and credit management service provider in Estonia and the Baltics. Its business model revolves around offering full-cycle debt management services to creditors and facilitating repayment options for debtors. The company benefits from being part of a larger finance group, which likely provides financial stability and operational synergies. The website's multilingual approach and self-service portals indicate a customer-centric strategy aimed at improving user experience and operational efficiency. The presence of social media channels and detailed company information supports transparency and trust. No direct revenue streams are visible on the site, but services such as debt portfolio purchases and legal collections suggest diversified income sources.

Security posture

The website enforces HTTPS and uses cookie consent tools to comply with privacy regulations. It employs Google Analytics and Tag Manager with privacy settings restricting ad and personalization storage, indicating attention to user privacy. However, the absence of a published security policy, incident response contacts, and security.txt file limits transparency in vulnerability management. No critical vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the HTML content. The use of third-party scripts is standard but requires ongoing monitoring to mitigate risks. Security headers are not explicitly visible in the HTML but may be configured server-side. Overall, the security posture is good but could be enhanced by publishing formal security policies and incident response information.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a dedicated security policy page outlining security practices and controls.
  2. Implement and expose a security.txt file to facilitate responsible vulnerability disclosure.
  3. Add explicit security headers such as X-Frame-Options and X-Content-Type-Options to improve protection against common web attacks.
  4. Provide clear incident response contact channels (e.g., security@ or abuse@ emails) on the website.
  5. Regularly audit and update third-party scripts and plugins to minimize vulnerabilities.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
Julianus Inkasso OÜ
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Julianus Inkasso
Description
Julianus Inkasso on Eesti kapitalil põhinev inkassofirma, mis pakub krediidihalduse täisteenust alates taustapäringutsest ja meeldetuletusteenusest kuni kohtumenetluse ja õigusabiteenuseni. Lisaks tegeleb võlanõuete ning võlaportfellide ostuga. Kuulub Aktiva Finance Group kontserni.
Key services
Võlgade sissenõudmine Eestis, Rahvusvaheline sissenõudmine, Kohtulik sissenõudmine, Võlaportfellide ost, Õigusabiteenus
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, Yoast SEO, Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, jQuery, Bootstrap, Slick Carousel, Fancybox, Cookie Script, Popup Maker, SVG Support
Frameworks
WordPress
Platforms
WordPress CMS
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent mechanism implemented
  • No exposed emails in HTML source
  • Use of CSP and security storage consent in Google Tag Manager

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Marketing tools
Cookie Script
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is professionally designed and well-structured.
  2. Content is focused on debt collection and credit management services.
  3. Multiple language support (Estonian, English, Russian) is implemented.
  4. Cookie consent and privacy policies are clearly presented.
  5. No signs of phishing or malware detected.
  6. Use of modern web technologies and analytics tools.
  7. No explicit security policy or incident response information found.
  8. Contact information is available but no direct emails or phone numbers in HTML source.
  9. Active social media presence on Facebook and LinkedIn.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress CMS with a modern tech stack including Bootstrap for responsive design, jQuery, and various plugins for SEO, cookie management, and UI enhancements. Google Analytics and Tag Manager are used for traffic analysis with privacy-conscious configurations. The site loads external resources from reputable CDNs and uses SVG support for graphics. Performance is moderate with good mobile optimization and SEO practices. Accessibility is basic but could be improved. The domain is hosted under Zone Media OÜ, consistent with the Estonian business location. Overall, the technical infrastructure supports a professional and user-friendly experience with room for enhancements in accessibility and security headers.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with julianus.ee. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review julianus.ee.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.