Skip to main content

Security report for jula.com

Jula · Retail · Sweden

Partial score · DNS & email only

61/100

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Jula is a Swedish retail company specializing in products for DIY projects, home, and garden improvement. The website serves as a landing page directing visitors to country-specific domains for Austria, Finland, Norway, Poland, and Sweden, indicating a broad European market presence. The business targets consumers interested in home improvement and DIY activities, positioning itself as a low-price retailer with a wide product assortment. The website content is professionally presented with consistent branding and clear navigation, although it lacks detailed business or legal information on this landing page. From a technical perspective, the website uses standard HTML5 and CSS3 with responsive images for different screen sizes, indicating good mobile optimization and moderate performance. However, no advanced frameworks, CMS, or analytics tools are detected in the provided HTML snippet. The absence of visible security headers and lack of explicit HTTPS confirmation in the data limit the assessment of the security posture. No forms or data collection mechanisms are present on this page, reducing immediate privacy risks but also indicating minimal user engagement features. Security-wise, the site lacks visible privacy and cookie policies, security policies, or incident response contacts, which are critical for GDPR compliance and user trust. No vulnerability disclosure or security.txt files are found. The absence of contact information and security best practices lowers the overall security score. There is no indication of WAF or blocking mechanisms, and the site content is fully accessible. Overall, the website is functional and professionally designed but lacks comprehensive privacy, security, and compliance features on this landing page. Strategic improvements in these areas would enhance trust and regulatory compliance, especially given the multi-national presence.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
25/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
6of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

5 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      No HTTPS encryption

      GDPR requires appropriate security measures for personal data

      What to do: Implement SSL/TLS certificate for HTTPS

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • Critical

      No HTTPS Encryption

      Website does not use HTTPS encryption, making all data transmission vulnerable to interception

      What to do: Implement SSL/TLS certificate and redirect all HTTP traffic to HTTPS

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching jula.com

This scan found 9 issues across 4 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
0
Email security
100
DNS health
80
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
25
Average
61

Not counted

  • Security headers: did not complete in this scan.
  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Jula operates as a large retail entity focused on DIY, home, and garden improvement products, serving multiple European countries through localized websites. Its business model centers on offering a broad product range at competitive prices to consumers passionate about home projects. The multi-country approach suggests a well-established market position in Northern and Central Europe. The absence of detailed business registration or VAT information on this page limits deeper business intelligence insights. No direct partnerships or subsidiaries are identified from the provided data. The company appears to maintain consistent branding and a clear value proposition targeting DIY enthusiasts and home improvers.

Security posture

The current security posture of the website is limited based on the provided HTML content. There is no evidence of HTTPS enforcement or security headers, which are fundamental for protecting user data and preventing common web attacks. The lack of privacy and cookie policies, as well as absence of incident response contacts or vulnerability disclosure mechanisms, indicates gaps in compliance with GDPR and best security practices. No forms or input fields reduce immediate risk exposure, but also limit user interaction. The site does not appear to use any known security frameworks or certifications. Overall, the security maturity is low, and improvements are necessary to meet modern standards and regulatory requirements.

Recommendations

  1. Implement HTTPS with a valid SSL/TLS certificate and enforce secure connections site-wide.
  2. Add comprehensive privacy and cookie policies with clear GDPR compliance statements.
  3. Include contact information for data protection officers and security incident reporting.
  4. Deploy security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options.
  5. Establish a vulnerability disclosure policy or publish a security.txt file to encourage responsible reporting.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Jula
Description
Jula is the Swedish retailer that offers handy people products for DIY-projects, garden and home improvement at low prices.
Key services
Retail of DIY products, Garden and home improvement products
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
HTML5, CSS3
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is a landing page directing users to country-specific sites
  2. No privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found on this page
  3. No contact emails, phone numbers, or physical addresses found in the HTML content
  4. No forms or data collection elements present
  5. No scripts or analytics libraries detected in the provided HTML
  6. Open Graph tags present for social sharing image
  7. Multiple alternate links to country-specific domains indicate multi-national presence
  8. Logo image present with alt text 'Jula' indicating brand consistency
  9. No visible security headers or meta tags related to security
  10. No social media links found in the provided HTML content
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a simple, clean HTML5 and CSS3 structure with responsive images to optimize display across devices, indicating good mobile optimization. No JavaScript libraries, CMS platforms, or analytics tools are detected in the provided content, suggesting a lightweight and possibly static site or a landing page. The presence of multiple alternate links to country-specific domains shows a multi-regional deployment strategy. Performance is likely moderate given the minimal external resources. However, the lack of visible security headers and HTTPS confirmation is a technical risk. The site could benefit from modern web frameworks and enhanced accessibility features to improve user experience and security.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with jula.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review jula.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.